Literature DB >> 26990114

Physician and Practice-Level Drivers and Disparities around Meaningful Use Progress.

Dawn Heisey-Grove1, Jennifer A King2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify physician and practice characteristics that are markers of success for meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs). DATA SOURCES: American Medical Association survey, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) EHR Incentive, Pioneer Accountable Care Organization, and PECOS Programs, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT's Regional Extension Center Program, and National Committee for Quality Assurance Patient-centered Medical Home certification program. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 865,370 physicians' participation in CMS's EHR Incentive Program and progress to stage 1 Meaningful Use between 2011 and 2013. Physician specialty, age, practice size, geographic markers, delivery reform participation, and technical assistance receipt were predictive elements. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Medicaid physicians were progressing more slowly to Meaningful Use than Medicare physicians: by 2013, 8 in 10 physicians registered with Medicare had achieved meaningful use, compared to one-third of Medicaid-registered physicians. The strongest predictors of meaningful use were technical assistance (79 percent more likely) and delivery reform participation (34 percent more likely).
CONCLUSIONS: Continued outreach and technical assistance that demonstrates strong interactions between meaningful use of health IT and delivery reform may facilitate further adoption of both initiatives. © Published 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health IT; delivery reform; disparities; electronic health record

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26990114      PMCID: PMC5264128          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  22 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Easing the adoption and use of electronic health records in small practices.

Authors:  Phyllis Torda; Esther S Han; Sarah Hudson Scholle
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey.

Authors:  Steven R Simon; Rainu Kaushal; Paul D Cleary; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; Eric G Poon; E John Orav; Helen G Lo; Deborah H Williams; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits.

Authors:  Sowmya R Rao; Catherine M Desroches; Karen Donelan; Eric G Campbell; Paola D Miralles; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program--stage 2. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2012-09-04

6.  Making it local: Beacon Communities use health information technology to optimize care management.

Authors:  Amy Allen; Terrisca R Des Jardins; Arvela Heider; Chatrian R Kanger; David F Lobach; Lee McWilliams; Jennifer M Polello; Alison L Rein; Abigail A Schachter; Ranjit Singh; Barbara Sorondo; Megan C Tulikangas; Scott A Turske
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.459

7.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Hsiao; Esther Hing
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2014-01

8.  First national survey of ACOs finds that physicians are playing strong leadership and ownership roles.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Valerie A Lewis; Stephen M Shortell; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  EHR adoption among doctors who treat the elderly.

Authors:  Valerie A Yeager; Nir Menachemi; Robert G Brooks
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Despite substantial progress In EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings.

Authors:  Michael F Furukawa; Jennifer King; Vaishali Patel; Chun-Ju Hsiao; Julia Adler-Milstein; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  5 in total

1.  Horizontal and vertical integration's role in meaningful use attestation over time.

Authors:  Jordan Everson; Michael R Richards; Melinda B Buntin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Physician Beliefs about the Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record: A Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Srinivas Emani; David Y Ting; Michael Healey; Stuart R Lipsitz; Andrew S Karson; David W Bates
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.

Authors:  Kyle E Knierim; Tristen L Hall; L Miriam Dickinson; Donald E Nease; Dionisia R de la Cerda; Douglas Fernald; Molly J Bleecker; Robert L Rhyne; W Perry Dickinson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-08-02

Review 4.  Health Information Technology and Accountable Care Organizations: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Casey P Balio; Nate C Apathy; Robin L Danek
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2019-07-08

5.  Growing Disparities in Patient-Provider Messaging: Trend Analysis Before and After Supportive Policy.

Authors:  Nicole Senft; Evan Butler; Jordan Everson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.