BACKGROUND: Access to primary care could reduce use of more costly health care by uninsured individuals through prevention and early treatment. We analyzed data from a program providing free primary care to test this hypothesis. METHODS: We compared emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations among uninsured, low-income adults who received immediate versus delayed access to a program providing free primary care, including labs, X-rays, and specialty consultation. We used surveys to identify ER visits and hospitalizations during the 12 months preceding and following program enrollment or wait list entry. RESULTS: Hospitalizations decreased from the year before entry to the year following entry in participants with immediate and delayed (6.0% vs 8.8% decrease) access. ER use also decreased in both groups (11.2% vs 15.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Free primary care services and specialty consultation did not reduce use of more costly health care services during its first year. More prolonged availability of primary care might have greater impact.
BACKGROUND: Access to primary care could reduce use of more costly health care by uninsured individuals through prevention and early treatment. We analyzed data from a program providing free primary care to test this hypothesis. METHODS: We compared emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations among uninsured, low-income adults who received immediate versus delayed access to a program providing free primary care, including labs, X-rays, and specialty consultation. We used surveys to identify ER visits and hospitalizations during the 12 months preceding and following program enrollment or wait list entry. RESULTS: Hospitalizations decreased from the year before entry to the year following entry in participants with immediate and delayed (6.0% vs 8.8% decrease) access. ER use also decreased in both groups (11.2% vs 15.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Free primary care services and specialty consultation did not reduce use of more costly health care services during its first year. More prolonged availability of primary care might have greater impact.
Entities:
Keywords:
community health; health outcomes; impact evaluation; primary care; program evaluation
Authors: P Arora; G T Obrador; R Ruthazer; A T Kausz; K B Meyer; C S Jenuleson; B J Pereira Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Andrew P Wilper; Steffie Woolhandler; Karen E Lasser; Danny McCormick; David H Bor; David U Himmelstein Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-08-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Maria F Nunez; Gezzer Ortega; Lucas G Souza Mota; Olubode A Olufajo; Derek W Altema; Terrence M Fullum; Daniel Tran Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Maya M Jeyaraman; Leslie Copstein; Nameer Al-Yousif; Rachel N Alder; Scott W Kirkland; Yahya Al-Yousif; Roger Suss; Ryan Zarychanski; Malcolm B Doupe; Simon Berthelot; Jean Mireault; Patrick Tardif; Nicole Askin; Tamara Buchel; Rasheda Rabbani; Thomas Beaudry; Melissa Hartwell; Carolyn Shimmin; Jeanette Edwards; Gayle Halas; William Sevcik; Andrea C Tricco; Alecs Chochinov; Brian H Rowe; Ahmed M Abou-Setta Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Vladimir Khanassov; Pierre Pluye; Sarah Descoteaux; Jeannie L Haggerty; Grant Russell; Jane Gunn; Jean-Frederic Levesque Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2016-10-10
Authors: Andrea S Wallace; Brenda Luther; Jia-Wen Guo; Ching-Yu Wang; Shawna Sisler; Bob Wong Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Mélanie Ann Smithman; Sarah Descôteaux; Émilie Dionne; Lauralie Richard; Mylaine Breton; Vladimir Khanassov; Jeannie L Haggerty Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2020-10-06