Literature DB >> 23799711

An epidemiologic analysis of low back pain in primary care: a hot humid country and global comparison.

Abdulbari Bener1, Elnour E Dafeeah, Khalid Alnaqbi, Omar Falah, Taha Aljuhaisi, Alhassan Sadeeq, Shehryar Khan, Josia Schlogl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is one of the most common conditions for which patients seek medical care. AIM: The aim of the study was to study the epidemiology of low back pain in primary care setting with emphasis on frequency, sociodemographic factors, and impact of low back pain on lifestyle habits. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. A representative sample of 2742 patients was approached and 2180 subjects agreed to participate in this study (79.5%). The survey was conducted among primary health care visitors during the period from March to October 2012. The questionnaire collected the sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, and type of treatment taken for relief from recruited subjects.
RESULTS: Of the subjects studied, 52.9% were males and 47.1% were females. The prevalence of low back pain in the study sample was 59.2%. Low back pain was more prevalent among women (67.7%) than among men (51.6%). The proportion of low back pain was highest in the age-group 45 to 55 years in both the genders (37.6% and 36.4%, respectively). Nearly half of the men (45.7%) and women (45.2%) with low back pain were overweight with a significant difference (P < .001). More than half of the women with low back pain were housewives (50.4%), whereas most of the men had clerical jobs (36.8%). There was a significant difference observed between men and women in terms of nationality (P < .001), body mass index (P < .001), and occupation (P < .001). Prolonged standing (41.2% vs 29.5%; P < .001) and use of sponge mattress (50.9% vs 45.8%; P .041) was significantly higher among male patients with low back pain compared with females. Coughing/sneezing/straining (9.7% vs 5.9%; P = .01) were more frequent triggering factors in male patients with low back pain as compared with females.
CONCLUSION: The study findings revealed that the prevalence of low back pain was higher among women than among men. Low back pain was observed more frequently among older people and among those who were overweight.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; lifestyle habits; low back pain; primary health care; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23799711     DOI: 10.1177/2150131913479385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health        ISSN: 2150-1319


  5 in total

1.  Prevalence, consequences and predictors of low back pain among nurses in a tertiary care setting.

Authors:  Sameh M Abolfotouh; Karim Mahmoud; Khaled Faraj; Gemeh Moammer; Abir ElSayed; Mostafa A Abolfotouh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Low back pain and some associated factors: is there any difference between genders?

Authors:  Thiago Paulo Frascareli Bento; Caio Vitor Dos Santos Genebra; Nicoly Machado Maciel; Guilherme Porfírio Cornelio; Sandra Fiorelli Almeida Penteado Simeão; Alberto de Vitta
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The Covid Impact to Public Healthcare Utilization Among Urban Low-Income Subsidized Community in Klang Valley Malaysia.

Authors:  Sharifah Zawani Syed Ahmad Yunus; Sharifa Ezat Wan Puteh; Adliah Mhd Ali; Faiz Daud
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-17

4.  A meta-analysis of the association between physical demands of domestic labor and back pain among women.

Authors:  Abisola Osinuga; Chelsea Hicks; Segun E Ibitoye; Marin Schweizer; Nathan B Fethke; Kelly K Baker
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Low back pain in adolescents and association with sociodemographic factors, electronic devices, physical activity and mental health.

Authors:  Thiago Paulo Frascareli Bento; Guilherme Porfirio Cornelio; Priscila de Oliveira Perrucini; Sandra Fiorelli Almeida Penteado Simeão; Marta Helena Souza de Conti; Alberto de Vitta
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.990

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.