High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a highly conserved, ubiquitous protein, is released into the circulation during sterile inflammation (e.g. arthritis, trauma) and circulatory shock. It participates in the pathogenesis of delayed inflammatory responses and organ dysfunction. While several molecules have been identified that modulate the release of HMGB1, less attention has been paid to identify pharmacological inhibitors of the downstream inflammatory processes elicited by HMGB1 (C23-C45 disulfide C106 thiol form). In the current study, a cell-based medium-throughput screening of a 5000+ compound focused library of clinical drugs and drug-like compounds was performed in murine RAW264.7 macrophages, in order to identify modulators of HMGB1-induced tumor-necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) production. Clinically used drugs that suppressed HMGB1-induced TNFα production included glucocorticoids, beta agonists, and the anti-HIV compound indinavir. A re-screen of the NIH clinical compound library identified beta-agonists and various intracellular cAMP enhancers as compounds that potentiate the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on HMGB1-induced TNFα production. The molecular pathways involved in this synergistic anti-inflammatory effect are related, at least in part, to inhibition of TNFα mRNA synthesis via a synergistic suppression of ERK/IκB activation. Inhibition of TNFα production by prednisolone+salbutamol pretreatment was also confirmed in vivo in mice subjected to HMGB1 injection; this effect was more pronounced than the effect of either of the agents administered separately. The current study unveils several drug-like modulators of HMGB1-mediated inflammatory responses and offers pharmacological directions for the therapeutic suppression of inflammatory responses in HMGB1-dependent diseases.
High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a highly conserved, ubiquitous protein, is released into the circulation during sterile inflammation (e.g. arthritis, trauma) and circulatory shock. It participates in the pathogenesis of delayed inflammatory responses and organ dysfunction. While several molecules have been identified that modulate the release of HMGB1, less attention has been paid to identify pharmacological inhibitors of the downstream inflammatory processes elicited by HMGB1 (C23-C45 disulfideC106 thiol form). In the current study, a cell-based medium-throughput screening of a 5000+ compound focused library of clinical drugs and drug-like compounds was performed in murineRAW264.7 macrophages, in order to identify modulators of HMGB1-induced tumor-necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) production. Clinically used drugs that suppressed HMGB1-induced TNFα production included glucocorticoids, beta agonists, and the anti-HIV compound indinavir. A re-screen of the NIH clinical compound library identified beta-agonists and various intracellular cAMP enhancers as compounds that potentiate the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on HMGB1-induced TNFα production. The molecular pathways involved in this synergistic anti-inflammatory effect are related, at least in part, to inhibition of TNFα mRNA synthesis via a synergistic suppression of ERK/IκB activation. Inhibition of TNFα production by prednisolone+salbutamol pretreatment was also confirmed in vivo in mice subjected to HMGB1 injection; this effect was more pronounced than the effect of either of the agents administered separately. The current study unveils several drug-like modulators of HMGB1-mediated inflammatory responses and offers pharmacological directions for the therapeutic suppression of inflammatory responses in HMGB1-dependent diseases.
High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) was initially considered a nuclear protein regulating gene transcription. However, data emerging over the last decade identified its separate role as a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is released actively and passively from cells during inflammation and injury [1]–[3]. According to a current classification, the immune response can be regulated by endogenous danger signals (damage-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs; alarmins) as well as exogenous pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). In this context, HMGB1 has been identified as a bona fide DAMP (i.e. a mediator released during sterile inflammatory processes), as well as a mediator released during PAMP-associated inflammatory events (e.g. sepsis and septic shock), which participates in the pathogenesis of the delayed inflammatory response, organ injury and contributes to disease mortality [1]–[3].Significant work has focused on the molecular mechanisms of HMGB1 release and on the therapeutic neutralization of HMGB1, either by antibodies, or by inhibiting its binding to its receptors RAGE and TLR4 [1]–[7]. Several compounds have been identified that attenuate the release of HMGB1, including glucocorticoids, chloroquine, gold salts, nicotinic receptor agonists, ethyl pyruvate and inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase [3], [8]–[11]. However, the inflammatory cellular responses downstream from HMGB1 are less understood, and no systematic survey has been conducted to characterize these pathways or to identify their pharmacological modulators. One determinant of the bioactivity of extracellular HMGB1 is based on the redox status of its three conserved thiol groups. The all thiol confirmation has been show to facilitate the binding of CXCL12 to CXCR4 and thus exhibit chemokine-like properties [12]. The C23-C45 disulfideC106 thiol conformation binds to the CD14/MD2/TLR4 receptor complex [13], [14] and demonstrates cytokine-like properties. Using a cell-based medium-throughput screening approach, the goal of the current study was to identify drug-like compounds that down-regulate the cytokine-like activity of HMGB1-induced inflammatory processes in murine macrophages in vitro.
Methods
Materials and Reagents
A comprehensive screening set of 5,546 compounds was gathered comprising the NIH Clinical Collection (446 phase I–III trial compounds) from BioFocus (South San Francisco, CA), the FDA Approved Library (640 FDA approved bioactive compounds) from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY), the Prestwick Chemical Library (1200 marketed drugs in Europe) from Prestwick Chemical (Washington, DC), the US Drug Collection (1040 clinical trial stage USP drugs), the International Drug Collection (240 compounds marketed in Europe or Asia but not in the US) and Killer Plates (160 toxic substances) from MicroSource Discovery Systems (Gaylordsville, CT), the LOPAC1280 (1280 various biologically active compounds) from Sigma-Aldrich, (Saint Louis, MO) and the Natural Products (640 natural compounds and derivatives) from TimTec LLC (Newark, DE). The compounds were dissolved at 10 mM in dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO) and dilutions were made either in DMSO or in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) to obtain 0.5% final DMSO concentration. HMGB1 (C23-C45 disulfideC106 thiol form) was prepared as previously described [15] and diluted in OptiMEM I medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Unless specified otherwise, all other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Cell Culture
RAW 264.7murine macrophages were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Hyclone, Logan, UT) containing 4.5 g/l glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, PAA Laboratories Inc, Westborough, MA), 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Prior to HMGB1 stimulation the culture medium was replaced with OptiMEM I reduced serum medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
Screening Assay
RAW 264.7 cells (100 000/well) were plated into 96-well tissue culture plates and cultured overnight. Culture medium was replaced with OptiMEM prior to adding compounds. Test compounds were supplied at 10 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and were diluted in DMSO and in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) to reach 3 µM final concentration (and 0.5% DMSO) in the culture medium. The Natural Products Library was screened at 1 µg/ml final concentration. Compounds were administered in 1/20 volume 1 hour prior to HMGB1 treatment. In the combined screen the cells received additional dexamethasone (3 µM) treatment. HMGB1 was added at 5 µg/ml final concentration in 1/10 volume and the cells were incubated for 18 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Supernatant was collected to measure TNFα secretion and LDH release.
Viability (MTT Assay) and LDH Release Measurements
The MTT assay and LDH activity measurements were performed as previously described [16]. Briefly, the cells were incubated in medium containing 0.5 mg·mL−1,3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Calbiochem, EMD BioSciences, San Diego, CA) for 1 hour at 37°C at 5% CO2 atmosphere. The converted formazan dye was dissolved in isopropanol and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm. Serial dilution of the cells was used to calculate the count of viable cells. Viability values are shown as percent values relative to vehicle treated controls. LDH release was measured by mixing cell culture supernatant (30 µl) with 100 µl LDH assay reagent containing 110 mM lactic acid, 1350 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), 290 mM N-methylphenazonium methyl sulfate (PMS), 685 mM 2-(4-Iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride (INT) and 200 mM Tris (pH 8.2). The changes in absorbance were read kinetically at 492 nm for 15 min (kinetic LDH assay). LDH activity values are shown as Vmax (mOD/min).
TNFα ELISA
Supernatant was diluted 10 times in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the TNFα levels were determined with a commercially available ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) on a robotic system comprising of a plate washer (EL406, Biotek, Winooski, VT), a dispenser (MicroFlo, Biotek, Winooski, VT), a pipetting station (Precision, Biotek, Winooski, VT), an incubator (Cytomat 2C, Thermo Electron Corporation, Asheville, NC) and plate reader (Synergy 2, Biotek, Winooski, VT) connected with a robotic arm (Twister II, Caliper Life Sciences Inc, Hopkinton, MA).
RNA Isolation, Gene Expression Measurements
Total RNA was isolated from RAW 264.7 cells exposed to HMGB1 or vehicle for 1.5 or 6 hours using a commercial RNA purification kit (SV total RNA isolation kit, Promega, Madison, WI). 2 µg RNA was reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Archive kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described [17]. 1 µg RNA was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol for gene expression measurements using the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway real-time PCR array (PAMM-0018ZD, SA Biosciences, Frederick, MD) on CFX96 thermocycler (Biorad, Hercules, CA) and analyzed with the tool provided by SA Biosciences. A full list of the genes investigated is deposited in Table S1. Taqman assay for TNFα was performed using a commercial assay (TNFα assay ID: Mm00443260_g1, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) using GAPDH (VIC/MGB Probe, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) control as normalizer.
Western Blotting
Cells were lysed in denaturing loading buffer (20 mM Tris, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 6 M urea, 100 µg/ml bromophenol blue, 200 mM ß-mercaptoethanol) freshly supplemented with 2 mM sodium vanadate, 100 mM sodium fluoride, 20 mM beta-glycerophosphate and protease inhibitors (Complete Mini EDTA-free, Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). Lysates were sonicated, boiled and resolved on 4–12% NuPage Bis-Tris acrylamide gels (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), then transferred to nitrocellulose. Membranes were blocked in 10% non-fat dried milk and probed overnight with phospho-ERK1/2, (Cell Signaling, Boston, MA), phospho-p38 or phospho-IκB antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, CA). After incubation with peroxidase conjugates the blots were detected on a CCD-camera based detection system (GBox, Syngene USA, Frederick, MD) with enhanced chemiluminescent substrate. To normalize signals, membranes were stripped in 62.5 mM Tris, 2% SDS, 100 mM ß-mercaptoethanol at 60°C for 30 min, blocked and re-probed with antibodies against ERK1/2, p38 and IκB. The signals were quantitated using Genetools analysis software (Syngene USA, Frederick, MD).
Pharmacological Modulation of HMGB1-induced TNFα Production in vivo
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (Permit Number: 1110054). The procedures were performed humanely with minimal suffering. 6–7 week-old Balb/c male mice (The Jackson Laboratory) were pretreated subcutaneously with 20 mg/kg prednisolone, 10 mg/kg salbutamol, the combination of prednisolone and salbutamol (doses as above), or the glucocorticoid receptor blocker mifepristone (30 mg/kg) or the β-receptor antagonist propranolol (10 mg/kg) or vehicle for 3 hours. Mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 0.5 mg/mouseHMGB1 and animals were sacrificed 8 hours later. Serum levels of TNFα were measured by ELISA (as above).
Statistical analysis
Data are shown as means ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was applied for statistical analysis and for the determination of significance, the Tukey’s post-hoc test was used. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were performed using Graphpad Prism 4 analysis software. Experiments were performed at least 3 times on different days.
Results
HMGB1 Induces Inflammatory Mediator Production and Cytotoxicity in RAW 264.7 Macrophages
HMGB1 (1–10 µg/ml) induced concentration-dependent tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) secretion by RAW 264.7 cells, an effect, which was potentiated by IFN-γ (Fig. 1A). HMGB1 also reduced cell viability (Fig. 1B); this cytotoxic response became more pronounced at later time points (48 h, 72 h) (Fig. 2) and was associated with a suppression of mitochondrial function (Fig. 3) and caspase activation (Fig. 4). In addition to TNFα, HMGB1 also upregulated multiple pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL1a, IL1b, IL6, TNFβ) and chemokine (Ccl2, MCP-1, Cxcl10) genes, as well as the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL10 (Fig. 1C). The HMGB1-mediated responses were also associated with an upregulation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) (Fig. 1C). Moreover, HMGB1 induced a down-regulation of TLR4 and MD2 and upregulation of TLR2, TLR9 and TLR adaptor molecule 1 (Ticam1) (Fig. 1C). Thus, the form of HMGB1 used for the screen exhibited the expected cytokine like properties of C23-C45 disulfideC106 thiolHMGB1.
Figure 1
HMGB1 induces an inflammatory response in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
A–B: RAW 264.7 cells were treated with the indicated amount of HMGB1 and IFN-γ for 18 hours and the TNFα secretion was measured in the supernatant. The viability of the cells was measured by the MTT assay. (*p<0.05 compared to vehicle treated cells, #p<0.05 IFN-γ treated group compared to the respective HMGB1-treated group) C: RAW 264.7 cells were treated with HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 1.5 hours and the expression of TLR-associated genes was analyzed with TLR signaling pathways array. The gene symbols and the average fold-expression values are shown compared to vehicle-treated cells in the color-scale, according to the their relative expression. (*p<0.05 compared to vehicle-treated cells.).
Figure 2
Concentration- and time-dependence of the HMGB1-induced inflammatory response and reduction in cell viability in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
RAW 264.7 cells were treated with the indicated amount of HMGB1 for 24, 48 or 72 hours. A: Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay and B: TNFα secretion was measured in the supernatant.
Figure 3
Time-dependence of the HMGB1-induced suppression of cellular bioenergetics in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 24, 48 or 72 hours. Cellular bioenergetic parameters were measured with Seahorse extracellular fluid analysis. A: Time-dependent decrease in basal cellular respiration (Oxygen Consumption Rate, OCR). (**p<0.01 compared to vehicle treated cells) B: Time-dependent decrease in maximal cellular respiration. (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01 compared to vehicle treated cells). C: Representative tracing comparing cellular respiration (Oxygen Consumption Rate) in response to sequential administration of pharmacological modulators of cell metabolism in vehicle-treated cells or cells treated with HMGB1 for 72 hours. Basal Respiration, Calculated ATP Turnover, Proton Leak and Maximal Respiration areas are indicated and demonstrate a marked suppression of cellular bioenergetic parameters.
Figure 4
HMGB1 induces time-dependent caspase activation in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 24, 48 or 72 hours. Activated Caspase-3 was detected in cell extracts by Western blotting. Tubulin was used for loading control. The graph shows relative Caspase-3 activation values, normalized to tubulin. (**p<0.01 shows significant caspase activation compared to vehicle-treated cells).
HMGB1 induces an inflammatory response in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
A–B: RAW 264.7 cells were treated with the indicated amount of HMGB1 and IFN-γ for 18 hours and the TNFα secretion was measured in the supernatant. The viability of the cells was measured by the MTT assay. (*p<0.05 compared to vehicle treated cells, #p<0.05 IFN-γ treated group compared to the respective HMGB1-treated group) C: RAW 264.7 cells were treated with HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 1.5 hours and the expression of TLR-associated genes was analyzed with TLR signaling pathways array. The gene symbols and the average fold-expression values are shown compared to vehicle-treated cells in the color-scale, according to the their relative expression. (*p<0.05 compared to vehicle-treated cells.).
Concentration- and time-dependence of the HMGB1-induced inflammatory response and reduction in cell viability in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
RAW 264.7 cells were treated with the indicated amount of HMGB1 for 24, 48 or 72 hours. A: Cell viability was measured with the MTT assay and B: TNFα secretion was measured in the supernatant.
Time-dependence of the HMGB1-induced suppression of cellular bioenergetics in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 24, 48 or 72 hours. Cellular bioenergetic parameters were measured with Seahorse extracellular fluid analysis. A: Time-dependent decrease in basal cellular respiration (Oxygen Consumption Rate, OCR). (**p<0.01 compared to vehicle treated cells) B: Time-dependent decrease in maximal cellular respiration. (*p<0.05 and **p<0.01 compared to vehicle treated cells). C: Representative tracing comparing cellular respiration (Oxygen Consumption Rate) in response to sequential administration of pharmacological modulators of cell metabolism in vehicle-treated cells or cells treated with HMGB1 for 72 hours. Basal Respiration, Calculated ATP Turnover, Proton Leak and Maximal Respiration areas are indicated and demonstrate a marked suppression of cellular bioenergetic parameters.
HMGB1 induces time-dependent caspase activation in RAW 264.7 macrophages.
RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 24, 48 or 72 hours. Activated Caspase-3 was detected in cell extracts by Western blotting. Tubulin was used for loading control. The graph shows relative Caspase-3 activation values, normalized to tubulin. (**p<0.01 shows significant caspase activation compared to vehicle-treated cells).
Identification of Inhibitors of HMGB1-induced TNFα Production by Cell-based Screening
Cell-based screening of a focused library of over 5,000 clinical drugs, natural products and pharmacologically active compounds identified ∼2% of the compounds, which suppressed TNFα production, without adversely affecting cell viability (Table 1; Fig. 5). Conversely, a limited number of compounds induced a significant enhancement of HMGB1-mediated TNFα response (Table 2). A full list of the primary screen data is deposited in Table S2.
Table 1
List of hit compounds identified in the primary screen.
Name
Library
Biological activity
TNFα production (% of HMGB1 stimulation)
viability (%)
piperlongumine
Natural Products
anti-inflammatory, antioxidant
0
94
indapamide
ENZO FDA
sulphonamide diuretic
0
92
parthenolide
Prestwick
MAP kinase inhibitor anti-inflammatory
2
92
stattic
LOPAC
STAT3 activation inhibitor
14
125
parthenolide
LOPAC
MAP kinase inhibitor anti-inflammatory
20
104
U0126
LOPAC
inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2 (MAP kinase kinase)
20
92
rubescensin A
Microsource Killer
antibacterial, antineoplastic
21
93
2′,4′-dihydroxyflavone
Natural Products
flavone
21
83
ethylnorepinephrin
Microsource US Drug
adrenergic agonist, bronchodilator
22
112
parthenolide
Natural Products
MAP kinase inhibitor anti-inflammatory
23
102
dexamethasone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
23
100
betamethasone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
24
90
metaproterenol
Prestwick
beta-adrenergic agonist, bronchodilator
26
87
budesonide
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
27
96
dexamethasone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
29
107
hydrocortisone base
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
29
115
tolnaftate
Prestwick
antifungal
29
90
fludrocortisone
Prestwick
mineralocorticoid, glucocorticoid
30
98
dexamethasone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
30
106
fenoterol hydrobromide
Prestwick
beta-adrenergic agonist, bronchodilatator
31
100
tyloxapol
Microsource US Drug
polymeric nonionic detergent
31
92
triamcinolone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
31
92
6-alpha-methylprednisolone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
31
110
flumethasone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
31
109
ST057244
Natural Products
32
85
isoalantolactone
Natural Products
sesquiterpene lactone
32
101
ritodrine
Prestwick
beta2 adrenergic agonist, tocolytic
32
98
imipenem
Prestwick
antibiotic
32
101
clenbuterol
Prestwick
beta-adrenergic agonist, bronchodilatator
32
98
prenylamine
Prestwick
Ca++ channel blocker, vasodilator
33
87
hydrocortisone
Natural Products
glucocorticoid steroid
33
113
lidocaine
Prestwick
Na+ channel blocker, local anesthetic
33
91
prednisolone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
33
107
flurandrenolide
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
33
116
prednisolone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
34
110
bethamethasone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
34
129
fluticasone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
34
78
clenbuterol
Microsource Intl Drug
beta2-adrenergic agonist, bronchodilatator
35
111
ibudilast
LOPAC
phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor
35
101
Bay 11-7085
LOPAC
IκB phosphorylation inhibitor, inhibitor of NF-κB
35
94
fluocinolone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
35
115
tulobuterol
Microsource Intl Drug
beta-adrenergic agonist, bronchodilatator
35
111
clobetasol propionate
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
36
146
flurandrenolide
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
36
107
prednisolone
Natural Products
glucocorticoid steroid
36
106
flunisolide
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
36
109
dexamethasone
Natural Products
glucocorticoid steroid
37
104
flumethasone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
37
133
albuterol
Microsource US Drug
beta-adrenergic agonist, bronchodilatator
37
100
hydrocortisone
Natural Products
glucocorticoid steroid
37
109
flumethasone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
38
117
nordihydroguaiaretic acid
Natural Products
from creosote bush, Larrea divaricata
38
92
2,6-dimethoxyquinone
Microsource Killer
antibacterial, mutagen
38
82
dichlorisone
Microsource Int Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
38
107
salbutamol
Prestwick
beta-adrenergic agonist, bronchodilatator
38
102
bethamethasone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
39
114
hydrocortisone
LOPAC
glucocorticoid steroid
39
110
triamcinolone
ENZO FDA
glucocorticoid steroid
39
109
desoxymetasone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
39
126
mometasone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
39
124
Bay 11-7082
LOPAC
IκB phosphorylation inhibitor, inhibitor of NF-κB
39
95
prednisolone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
39
110
fluorometholone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
39
104
3,7,4′-trihydroxyflavone
Natural Products
flavone
39
81
budesonide
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
39
110
halomethasone
NIH Clinical Collection
glucocorticoid steroid
39
106
fluorometholone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
40
114
triamcinolone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
40
115
ST009819
Natural Products
levoglucosenone derivative
40
101
prednisolone
ENZO FDA
glucocorticoid steroid
40
124
hydrocortisone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
40
115
fluticasone
NIH Clinical Collection
glucocorticoid steroid
40
93
rimexolone
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
40
96
isoproterenol
Prestwick
adrenergic agonist, bronchodilatator
40
109
methylprednisolone
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
41
115
methylprednisolone
ENZO FDA
glucocorticoid steroid
41
95
metaproterenol
Microsource US Drug
adrenergic agonist, bronchodilatator
41
104
karanjin
Natural Products
from Pongamia glabra, Leguminosae
41
100
salmeterol
ENZO FDA
beta2-adrenergic agonist, bronchodilator
41
111
betamethasone
ENZO FDA
glucocorticoid steroid
41
101
clobetasol
Microsource US Drug
glucocorticoid steroid
41
107
budesonide
LOPAC
glucocorticoid steroid
41
115
isotretinon
Microsource US Drug
antiacne, antineoplastic
41
115
benzyl isothiocyanate
Microsource Killer
antineoplastic, antibacterial, antifungal
41
89
quinacrine
Microsource Killer
anthelmintic, antimalarial, intercalating agent
42
77
flunisolide
Prestwick
glucocorticoid steroid
42
113
ellipticine
LOPAC
cytochrome P450 (CYP1A1) and DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor
Non-toxic compounds that reduced the HMGB1-induced TNFα production by 2 standard deviation values are listed in order of potency, according to their inhibitory potency for TNFα secretion. The source library of the compounds, their known biological activity and the respective viability values are shown. Viability was measured by the MTT assay. (Abbreviations: MAP kinase: Mitogen-activated protein kinase, U0126∶1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis(2-aminophenylthio)butadiene, MEK: mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, STAT3: Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, ST057244∶1-[(2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoyl]piperidin-2-one, Bay 11-7085: (2E)-3-[[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)pheny?l]sulfonyl]-2-propenenitrile, Bay 11-7082∶3- [(4- methylphenyl)sulfonyl]- (2E)- propenenitrile, ST009819: (2R,3R,13R,14R)-3-(phenylcarbonyl)-17,19-dioxa-4-azapentacyclo[14.2.1.0<2,14>. 0<4,13>.0<7,12>]nonadeca-5,7(12),8,10-tetraen-15-one, MNS: 3,4-methylenedioxy-β-nitrostyrene, IkB: inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase, NF-κB: nuclear factor κB, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, Src: sarcoma tyrosine kinase, Syk: Spleen tyrosine kinase).
Figure 5
Screening for compounds that reduce the HMGB1-induced pro-inflammatory response.
A: Timeline of the cell-based screening: RAW 264.7 cells were pre-treated with test compounds and exposed to HMGB1 for 18 hours. TNFα production was measured from the supernatant and the viability of the cells was measured by the MTT assay. B: Dot graph showing the individual TNFα/viability results of the tested 5,646 compounds. TNFα responses are shown as % values of the HMGB1-induced TNFα production. Values lower than MEAN-2SD are shown in red (viability) and green (TNFα response) boxes to denote “toxic” and “Hit” compounds. C–D: Distribution of viability (C) and TNFα response (D) data with superimposed Gaussian distribution curves fitted to the data points.
Table 2
Compounds that enhance the HMGB1-induced TNFα production of RAW264.7 cells.
Name
Library
Biological activity
TNFα production (% of HMGB1 stimulation)
viability (%)
beta-escin
Prestwick
an increaser of calcium permeability, venous insufficiency drug
inhibitor of the serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A
151
108
tannic acid
Microsource Killer
nonspecific enzyme/receptor blocker
150
99
Compounds augmenting the HMGB1-induced TNFα production by 2 standard deviation values are listed are listed in order of potency, according to their enhancing effect on TNFαα secretion. The source library of the compounds, their known biological activity and the respective viability values are shown. Viability was measured by the MTT assay. (Abbreviations: PKC: protein kinase C, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, PDGF: platelet-derived growth factor, HMG-CoA: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A, TrkA: TRK1-transforming tyrosine kinase protein).
Screening for compounds that reduce the HMGB1-induced pro-inflammatory response.
A: Timeline of the cell-based screening: RAW 264.7 cells were pre-treated with test compounds and exposed to HMGB1 for 18 hours. TNFα production was measured from the supernatant and the viability of the cells was measured by the MTT assay. B: Dot graph showing the individual TNFα/viability results of the tested 5,646 compounds. TNFα responses are shown as % values of the HMGB1-induced TNFα production. Values lower than MEAN-2SD are shown in red (viability) and green (TNFα response) boxes to denote “toxic” and “Hit” compounds. C–D: Distribution of viability (C) and TNFα response (D) data with superimposed Gaussian distribution curves fitted to the data points.Non-toxic compounds that reduced the HMGB1-induced TNFα production by 2 standard deviation values are listed in order of potency, according to their inhibitory potency for TNFα secretion. The source library of the compounds, their known biological activity and the respective viability values are shown. Viability was measured by the MTT assay. (Abbreviations: MAP kinase: Mitogen-activated protein kinase, U0126∶1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis(2-aminophenylthio)butadiene, MEK: mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase, STAT3: Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, ST057244∶1-[(2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoyl]piperidin-2-one, Bay 11-7085: (2E)-3-[[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)pheny?l]sulfonyl]-2-propenenitrile, Bay 11-7082∶3- [(4- methylphenyl)sulfonyl]- (2E)- propenenitrile, ST009819: (2R,3R,13R,14R)-3-(phenylcarbonyl)-17,19-dioxa-4-azapentacyclo[14.2.1.0<2,14>. 0<4,13>.0<7,12>]nonadeca-5,7(12),8,10-tetraen-15-one, MNS: 3,4-methylenedioxy-β-nitrostyrene, IkB: inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase, NF-κB: nuclear factor κB, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, Src: sarcoma tyrosine kinase, Syk: Spleen tyrosine kinase).Compounds augmenting the HMGB1-induced TNFα production by 2 standard deviation values are listed are listed in order of potency, according to their enhancing effect on TNFαα secretion. The source library of the compounds, their known biological activity and the respective viability values are shown. Viability was measured by the MTT assay. (Abbreviations: PKC: protein kinase C, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, PDGF: platelet-derived growth factor, HMG-CoA: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A, TrkA: TRK1-transforming tyrosine kinase protein).More than 50% of the hit compounds that inhibited TNFα production were glucocorticoids (Fig. 5; Table 1). Beta-adrenergic agonists represented the second-most common class. The activity of the hit compounds was next confirmed at 3 and 10 µM. Since glucocorticoids and beta agonists showed a clear class action, only a subset of these compounds was retested. Apart from glucocorticoids and beta agonists, the highest inhibitory activity was detected for the NF-κB inhibitors Bay 11-7085 and parthenolide, and the antioxidant piperlongumine. Increasing the concentration of the compounds to 10 µM did not produce more pronounced inhibitory responses, but approximately 15% of the hit compounds became slightly cytotoxic at this concentration (Table 3).
Table 3
List of confirmed hit compounds.
Compound
Biological activity
Source Library
Primary screen
Hit confirmation
TNFα response(% of HMGB1 stimulation)
viability (%)
TNFα response (% of HMGB1 stimulation)
3 µM
10 µM
Parthenolide
NF-κB inhibitor
Prestwick
2
92
21±2
0±0*
Bay 11-7085
NF-κB inhibitor
LOPAC
35
94
25±1
2±1*
Ethylnorepinephrine
beta adrenergic agonist
US Drug
22
112
31±0
26±1
Halomethasone
glucocorticoid
NIH Clinical
39
106
36±2
34±1
Salbutamol
beta adrenergic agonist
Prestwick
38
102
37±1
37±6
Dexamethasone
glucocorticoid
Prestwick
23
100
39±3
30±2
Budesonide
glucocorticoid
LOPAC
41
115
41±3
38±1
Indinavir
HIV protease inhibitor
NIH Clinical
43
96
42±3
42±3
Ethacrynic acid
diuretic
US Drug
43
96
44±0
3±1*
Fluticasone
glucocorticoid
NIH Clinical
40
93
44±4
43±1*
Hydrocortisone
glucocorticoid
LOPAC
39
110
45±1
45±3
Metaproterenol
beta adrenergic agonist
Prestwick
26
87
48±3
50±4
Fenoterol
beta adrenergic agonist
Prestwick
31
100
51±1
56±1
Ritodrine
beta2 adrenergic agonist
Prestwick
32
98
51±4
48±6
Terbutaline
beta2 adrenergic agonist
Prestwick
42
96
51±2
50±3
Isoflupredone
glucocorticoid
Prestwick
43
99
52±5
51±2
Clenbuterol
beta adrenergic agonist
Prestwick
32
98
52±4
44±5
MNS
Src/Syk kinase inhibitor
LOPAC
43
93
54±2
9±1*
Ethacrynic acid
diuretic
Prestwick
45
98
59±5
39±2*
Levonordefrin
adrenergic agonist
Prestwick
45
116
64±1
56±8
PABA potassium salt
vitamin Bx
US Drug
43
118
65±1
59±1
Isoproterenol
adrenergic agonist
Prestwick
40
109
67±2
58±5
Prenylamine
calcium channel blocker
Prestwick
33
87
69±4
59±4
Tyloxapol
surfactant
US Drug
31
92
78±0
57±2
Isotretinoin
retinoid
US Drug
41
115
79±2
60±5
Piperlongumine
antioxidant in peppers
Nat. Prod.
0
94
80±1
39±3*
Lidocaine
local anesthetic
Prestwick
33
91
not tested
Hit compounds of the primary screen were retested in replicates at 3 and 10 µM against HMGB1 and LPS and compounds are shown that decreased the HMGB-induced TNFα production by at least 40% in the hit confirmation experiments. (The majority of the glucocorticoids were not retested during the hit confirmation studies, since all glucocorticoids showed similar activity, confirming their class action.) TNFα production and viability values are shown for the primary screen and the TNFα production is shown for the hit confirmation experiments (Mean±SD). Compounds that reduced cell viability by at least 25% are labeled with an asterisk. (Abbreviations: Bay 11-7085: (2E)-3-[[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]sulfonyl]-2-propenenitrile, MNS: 3,4-methylenedioxy-β-nitrostyrene, PABA potassium salt: para-aminobenzoic acid potassium salt, NF-κB: nuclear factor κB, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, Src: sarcoma tyrosine kinase, Syk: Spleen tyrosine kinase).
Hit compounds of the primary screen were retested in replicates at 3 and 10 µM against HMGB1 and LPS and compounds are shown that decreased the HMGB-induced TNFα production by at least 40% in the hit confirmation experiments. (The majority of the glucocorticoids were not retested during the hit confirmation studies, since all glucocorticoids showed similar activity, confirming their class action.) TNFα production and viability values are shown for the primary screen and the TNFα production is shown for the hit confirmation experiments (Mean±SD). Compounds that reduced cell viability by at least 25% are labeled with an asterisk. (Abbreviations: Bay 11-7085: (2E)-3-[[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]sulfonyl]-2-propenenitrile, MNS: 3,4-methylenedioxy-β-nitrostyrene, PABA potassium salt: para-aminobenzoic acid potassium salt, NF-κB: nuclear factor κB, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, Src: sarcoma tyrosine kinase, Syk: Spleen tyrosine kinase).
Identification of Pharmacological Potentiators of Glucocorticoids by Cell-based Screening
We hypothesized that synergistic drug combinations may be more effective than single agents in controlling HMGB1-induced inflammatory responses. To identify compounds that potentiate the effect of glucocorticoids, a follow-up screen of the NIH Clinical Collection compound library was conducted in the presence of dexamethasone (3 µM). The screen identified beta2 agonists (salbutamol, salmeterol), the phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor rolipram and as prostaglandin E1 as synergistic enhancers of the glucocorticoid's effect (Fig. 6, Table 4). In addition, the dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (R)-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine HCl), the structurally related benzodiazepine lorazepam, the antioxidant ebselen and the δ1 opioid receptor agonist SB 205607 decreased TNFα production in the presence of the glucocorticoid. As expected, the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone attenuated the effect of dexamethasone (Table 4). A few drugs (e.g. cerivastatin, vindesine, vinorelbine) increased TNFα production in the presence dexamethasone (Table 4); this effect was related to the fact that, according to the results of the primary screen, these compounds, on their own, increase HMGB1-induced TNFα secretion (Table 1).
Figure 6
Combined screening to identify pharmacological potentiators of dexamethasone-mediated inhibition of the HMGB1-induced pro-inflammatory response.
RAW 264.7 cells were pre-treated with dexamethasone (3 µM) in combination with test compounds and exposed to HMGB1 for 18 hours. TNFα production was measured from the supernatant and the viability of the cells was measured by the MTT assay. A: TNFα responses measured in the combination screen are plotted versus the TNFα production values measured in the single compound screen. TNFα production values higher than MEAN+2SD are shown in red (“steroid inhibitors”) and values lower than MEAN+2SD in green boxes (“potentiators of steroids) for the combination screen. Red dots denote the toxic compounds, green the steroid potentiators and purple those that increase the TNFα production. Compounds that inhibited the HMGB-induced TNFα production in the single compound screen, but failed to potentiate the action of steroids are shown in yellow. B: TNFα responses relative to the activity of dexamethasone are plotted versus the viability values. Red and green boxes indicate the upper and lower 2 SD limits.
Table 4
Compounds of interest identified by screening of the NIH Library in the presence of 3 µM dexamethasone on HMGB1-induced TNFα production.
Compound
Biological activity
Single compound screen
Steroid combination screen
TNFα response (% of HMGB1 stimulation)
Viability (%)
TNFα response (% of HMGB1 stimulation)
Viability (%)
Steroid action enhancers (potentiators)
salmeterol
beta2 adrenergic agonist
50
102
21
111
rolipram
phosphodiesterase inhibitor
60
86
23
109
prostaglandin E1
prostaglandin
55
97
23
109
salbutamol sulfate
beta2 adrenergic agonist
51
91
25
110
lorazepam
benzodiazepine
50
95
27
108
SB 205607
δ1 opioid receptor agonist
53
102
29
110
R(+)-SCH-23390 HCl
D1 dopamine receptor antagonist
73
96
30
110
ebselen
anti-inflammatory antioxidant
85
103
34
117
Hit compounds in single-compound screen that do not enhance steroid action (non-potentiators)
fluticasone propionate
glucocorticoid steroid
40
93
43
108
halometasone monohydrate
glucocorticoid steroid
39
106
44
107
tadalafil
PDE5 inhibitor
49
107
44
108
tropisetron HCl
serotonin 5-HT3 antagonist
46
99
44
110
indinavir sulfate
HIV protease inhibitor
43
96
48
105
beclomethasone
glucocorticoid steroid
54
108
49
106
zaleplon
GABA A α1 agonist hypnotic
52
101
50
109
desoximetasone
glucocorticoid steroid
52
108
50
111
pergolide mesylate salt
dopamine receptor agonist
60
99
54
110
loteprednol etabonate
glucocorticoid steroid
59
104
62
108
Compounds that counteract dexamethasone (steroid inhibitors)
cerivastatin Na
statin
>150
100
83
126
rutin
platelet aggregation inhibitor
102
97
69
112
ritonavir
HIV protease inhibitor
112
98
73
113
vinorelbine bitartarate
antineoplastic
112
78
78
106
vindesine sulfate
mitotic inhibitor
120
69
96
84
mifepristone
glucocorticoid receptor antagonist
101
101
92
115
Toxic compounds
dactinomycin
antibiotics
1
1
0
2
triptolide
NF-κB inhibitor
0
2
0
1
homoharringtonine
60-S ribosome inhibitor
0
1
1
1
idarubicin HCl
anti-leukemic drug
6
2
9
2
epirubicin HCl
anthracycline drug
12
2
18
15
doxorubicin HCl
anthracycline drug
45
4
31
32
topotecan HCl
topoisomerase inhibitor
94
49
45
94
indarubicin
antineoplastic
100
72
54
94
diphenylcyclopropenone
local immune response inducer
114
71
56
100
artesunate
anti-malaria compound
121
74
75
78
vincristine sulfate
mitotic inhibitor
130
72
90
80
Compounds of interest are shown with their respective TNFα response and viability values attained in the single compound and combined screens. Drugs that reduced the TNFα response compared to the action of dexamethasone are classified as potentiators. Drugs that decreased the TNFα response by themselves, but showed negligible increase in their activity in combination with dexamethasone are listed as non-potentiators. Compounds that resulted in higher TNFα secretion (>MEAN+2SD) are listed as steroid inhibitors. Compounds that reduced the viability by more than 2 SD (<75% viability) are listed as toxic compounds.
Combined screening to identify pharmacological potentiators of dexamethasone-mediated inhibition of the HMGB1-induced pro-inflammatory response.
RAW 264.7 cells were pre-treated with dexamethasone (3 µM) in combination with test compounds and exposed to HMGB1 for 18 hours. TNFα production was measured from the supernatant and the viability of the cells was measured by the MTT assay. A: TNFα responses measured in the combination screen are plotted versus the TNFα production values measured in the single compound screen. TNFα production values higher than MEAN+2SD are shown in red (“steroid inhibitors”) and values lower than MEAN+2SD in green boxes (“potentiators of steroids) for the combination screen. Red dots denote the toxic compounds, green the steroid potentiators and purple those that increase the TNFα production. Compounds that inhibited the HMGB-induced TNFα production in the single compound screen, but failed to potentiate the action of steroids are shown in yellow. B: TNFα responses relative to the activity of dexamethasone are plotted versus the viability values. Red and green boxes indicate the upper and lower 2 SD limits.Compounds of interest are shown with their respective TNFα response and viability values attained in the single compound and combined screens. Drugs that reduced the TNFα response compared to the action of dexamethasone are classified as potentiators. Drugs that decreased the TNFα response by themselves, but showed negligible increase in their activity in combination with dexamethasone are listed as non-potentiators. Compounds that resulted in higher TNFα secretion (>MEAN+2SD) are listed as steroid inhibitors. Compounds that reduced the viability by more than 2 SD (<75% viability) are listed as toxic compounds.
Glucocorticoid/beta-adrenergic Agonist Synergy: Mechanism of Action
Using prednisolone (a prototypical glucocorticoid) and salbutamol (a prototypical beta 2 adrenergic agonist), follow-up experiments were designed to further characterize the pharmacological properties and underlying mechanisms of the glucocorticoid/beta-adrenergic synergy. Both prednisolone and salbutamol, on their own, decreased the HMGB1-induced TNFα production in the low nanomolar concentration range: they reached their maximum effect at around 100–300 nM, exhibiting a 50% inhibition of TNFα production (Fig. 7). Salbutamol (1 µM), in combination with prednisolone, significantly reduced TNFα production already at 10 nM (compared to salbutamol alone); at 100 nM prednisolone the combination reached its full potential (approximately 70% inhibition). Likewise, the combination of prednisolone (1 µM) with 30 nM salbutamol significantly reduced the HMGB1-induced TNFα response (compared to prednisolone alone) and with 300 nM salbutamol the combination reached its full potential (approximately 70% inhibition) (Fig. 7).
Figure 7
Prednisolone and salbutamol synergistically suppress HMGB1-induced TNFα secretion.
RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with prednisolone and salbutamol at the indicated concentrations and exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 18 hours. TNFα secretion (A, B) and LDH release (E, F) were measured in the supernatant. Cell viability (C, D) was measured by the MTT assay. (§p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group, #p<0.05 compared to the respective first compound treatment).
Prednisolone and salbutamol synergistically suppress HMGB1-induced TNFα secretion.
RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with prednisolone and salbutamol at the indicated concentrations and exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 18 hours. TNFα secretion (A, B) and LDH release (E, F) were measured in the supernatant. Cell viability (C, D) was measured by the MTT assay. (§p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group, #p<0.05 compared to the respective first compound treatment).HMGB1-induced TNFαα secretion was associated with a rapid-onset and marked increase in TNFα mRNA (Fig. 8). Prednisolone and salbutamol each decreased the TNFα mRNA level by 50%; combination of the two compounds synergistically inhibited the transcription of TNFα mRNA (Fig. 8). We next tested whether the early inhibition of TNFα production involves upstream signaling events such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation and IκB phosphorylation. HMGB1 induced an early and sustained activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2, p44 and p42) and p38 and of IκB phosphorylation (Fig. 9). The combination of salbutamol and prednisolone resulted in a partial, but statistically significant inhibition of ERK1 phosphorylation and IκB phosphorylation (Fig. 9). These data indicate the regulation of HMGB1-mediated cellular signaling by the glucocorticoid/beta-agonist combination has an upstream regulatory component.
Figure 8
Prednisolone and salbutamol inhibit the HMGB-induced TNFα production.
RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with prednisolone (1 µM) and salbutamol (1 µM) and then exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for various time up to 18 hours. A: TNFα secretion measured in the supernatant is plotted versus exposure length. (MEAN±SD values are shown) B: TNFα mRNA expression, normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), is shown as fold expression values of vehicle treated cells. (CTL: vehicle treated control, HMGB: cells exposed to HMGB1, Pred: cells pretreated with prednisolone and exposed to HMGB1, Salb: cells pretreated with salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1, Pred+Salb: cells pretreated with both prednisolone and salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1. §p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group, #p<0.05 compared to single compound treatment).
Figure 9
MAPK activation and IκB phosphorylation in response to HMGB1 are ameliorated in synergy by prednisolone and salbutamol.
A: RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for the indicated length and the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, p38 and IκB was detected. B: RAW 264.7 cells pretreated with prednisolone (1 µM) and salbutamol (1 µM) were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 30 min (ERK1/2, p38) or 1 hour (IκB) and the activation was detected as phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204), phospho-p38 (Thr 180) or phospho-IκB-α (Ser 32/36). C: Bar graph shows the phosphorylation signal normalized to the total amount of the respective protein. (CTL: vehicle treated control, HMGB: cells exposed to HMGB1, Pred: cells pretreated with prednisolone and exposed to HMGB1, Salb: cells pretreated with salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1, Pred+Salb: cells pretreated with both prednisolone and salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1. §p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group).
Prednisolone and salbutamol inhibit the HMGB-induced TNFα production.
RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with prednisolone (1 µM) and salbutamol (1 µM) and then exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for various time up to 18 hours. A: TNFα secretion measured in the supernatant is plotted versus exposure length. (MEAN±SD values are shown) B: TNFα mRNA expression, normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), is shown as fold expression values of vehicle treated cells. (CTL: vehicle treated control, HMGB: cells exposed to HMGB1, Pred: cells pretreated with prednisolone and exposed to HMGB1, Salb: cells pretreated with salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1, Pred+Salb: cells pretreated with both prednisolone and salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1. §p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group, #p<0.05 compared to single compound treatment).
MAPK activation and IκB phosphorylation in response to HMGB1 are ameliorated in synergy by prednisolone and salbutamol.
A: RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for the indicated length and the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, p38 and IκB was detected. B: RAW 264.7 cells pretreated with prednisolone (1 µM) and salbutamol (1 µM) were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 30 min (ERK1/2, p38) or 1 hour (IκB) and the activation was detected as phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204), phospho-p38 (Thr 180) or phospho-IκB-α (Ser 32/36). C: Bar graph shows the phosphorylation signal normalized to the total amount of the respective protein. (CTL: vehicle treated control, HMGB: cells exposed to HMGB1, Pred: cells pretreated with prednisolone and exposed to HMGB1, Salb: cells pretreated with salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1, Pred+Salb: cells pretreated with both prednisolone and salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1. §p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group).To further characterize the effect of the glucocorticoid/beta-agonist combination on HMGB1-induced gene transcription, a TLR signaling pathway array was next employed. The responses could be characterized by four distinct expression patterns: a) prednisolone, but not salbutamol inhibiting gene expression, b) salbutamol, but not prednisolone inhibiting gene expression, c) the two compounds synergistically blocking gene expression and d) the two compounds synergistically enhancing gene expression (Fig. 10). The genes which were mostly inhibited by steroids included the interleukins (IL1a, Il1b, IL6, IL10) and Ptgs2 (COX-2); the inhibition exerted by the beta-2 agonist was dominant in case of the chemokines Ccl2 and Cxcl10 and TLR2 and TLR9; synergistic inhibition by the glucocorticoid and the beta-agonist was confirmed for TNFα, as well as demonstrated for lymphotoxin (Lta) and the TLR adaptor Ticam1 (Fig. 10). Unexpectedly, in a few instances, the steroid and the beta2 agonist led to a synergistic enhancement, as seen with Csf3 (GCSF), CD14, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (Cebpb), interleukin 1 receptor alpha (IL1R1) and TLR8 (Fig. 10).
Figure 10
The interaction of prednisolone and salbutamol in the inhibition of HMGB-induced gene expression.
RAW 264.7 cells pretreated with prednisolone (1 µM) and salbutamol (1 µM) were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 1.5 hours and the expression of TLR-associated genes was analyzed with TLR signaling pathways array. Gene expression normalized to control genes (GAPDH, actin, B2m, Gusb, Hsp90ab1) is shown as fold expression values of vehicle treated cells. (CTL: vehicle treated control, HMGB: cells exposed to HMGB1, Pred: cells pretreated with prednisolone and exposed to HMGB1, Salb: cells pretreated with salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1, Pred+Salb: cells pretreated with both prednisolone and salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1. §p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group, #p<0.05 compared to single compound treatment).
The interaction of prednisolone and salbutamol in the inhibition of HMGB-induced gene expression.
RAW 264.7 cells pretreated with prednisolone (1 µM) and salbutamol (1 µM) were exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 1.5 hours and the expression of TLR-associated genes was analyzed with TLR signaling pathways array. Gene expression normalized to control genes (GAPDH, actin, B2m, Gusb, Hsp90ab1) is shown as fold expression values of vehicle treated cells. (CTL: vehicle treated control, HMGB: cells exposed to HMGB1, Pred: cells pretreated with prednisolone and exposed to HMGB1, Salb: cells pretreated with salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1, Pred+Salb: cells pretreated with both prednisolone and salbutamol and exposed to HMGB1. §p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group, #p<0.05 compared to single compound treatment).Given the fact that both glucocorticoids and beta-receptor agonists represent endogenous hormones of the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary axis, we have next evaluated whether cortisol and/or adrenaline/noradrenaline, at concentrations that are comparable to their endogenous plasma levels, affect HMGB1-induced TNFα production. Cortisol, and, more markedly, the combination of adrenaline and noradrenaline, suppressed the HMGB1-induced TNFα response (Fig. 11).
Figure 11
Inhibition of the HMGB-induced inflammatory response by endogenous catecholamines and glucocorticoids at physiological concentrations.
RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with cortisol (0.7 µM), noradrenaline (0.5 ng/ml), adrenaline (0.5 ng/ml), dexamethasone (1 µM) and salbutamol (1 µM) and exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 18 hours. TNFα secretion was measured in the supernatant. (§p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group, #p<0.05 cells treated with all compounds in combination versus treated with a combination of two.).
Inhibition of the HMGB-induced inflammatory response by endogenous catecholamines and glucocorticoids at physiological concentrations.
RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with cortisol (0.7 µM), noradrenaline (0.5 ng/ml), adrenaline (0.5 ng/ml), dexamethasone (1 µM) and salbutamol (1 µM) and exposed to HMGB1 (5 µg/ml) for 18 hours. TNFα secretion was measured in the supernatant. (§p<0.05 HMGB1-treated group compared to vehicle treated control, *p<0.05 compared to HMGB1 group, #p<0.05 cells treated with all compounds in combination versus treated with a combination of two.).
Glucocorticoid/beta-adrenergic Agonist Synergy in vivo
The combination of prednisolone and salbutamol effectively suppressed HMGB1-induced TNFα production in Balb/c male mice in vivo, and this effect was more pronounced than the effect of either agent alone (Fig. 12). In contrast, the glucocorticoid receptor blocker mifepristone or the β-receptor antagonist propranolol did not enhance HMGB1-induced TNFα production (Fig. 12), suggesting that the response is not under significant control by endogenous glucocorticoids acting on the mifepristone-sensitive glucocorticoid receptor or by endogenous catecholamines acting on the β-receptor.
Figure 12
Inhibition of the HMGB-induced TNFα production by catecholamines and glucocorticoids in vivo.
Balb/c male mice (Charles River Laboratories) were injected with 0.5 mg/kg HMGB1 in the presence of 60 min pretreatment of either vehicle, or 20 mg/kg prednisolone, 10 mg/kg salbutamol, the combination of prednisolone and salbutamol (doses as above), or the glucocorticoid receptor blocker mifepristone (30 mg/kg) or the β-receptor antagonist propranolol (10 mg/kg). At 8 hours after HMGB1 injection, animals were sacrificed and serum levels of TNFα were measured. #p<0.05 represents a significant increase in TNFα serum levels in response to HMGB1; *p<0.05 represents significant inhibition of HMGB1-induced TNFα production by the various pharmacological agents indicated. n = 7 animals per group.
Inhibition of the HMGB-induced TNFα production by catecholamines and glucocorticoids in vivo.
Balb/c male mice (Charles River Laboratories) were injected with 0.5 mg/kg HMGB1 in the presence of 60 min pretreatment of either vehicle, or 20 mg/kg prednisolone, 10 mg/kg salbutamol, the combination of prednisolone and salbutamol (doses as above), or the glucocorticoid receptor blocker mifepristone (30 mg/kg) or the β-receptor antagonist propranolol (10 mg/kg). At 8 hours after HMGB1 injection, animals were sacrificed and serum levels of TNFα were measured. #p<0.05 represents a significant increase in TNFα serum levels in response to HMGB1; *p<0.05 represents significant inhibition of HMGB1-induced TNFα production by the various pharmacological agents indicated. n = 7 animals per group.
Discussion
It is well established that HMGB1 plays a central role in sterile inflammation [1]–[3]. This screen was undertaken to identify inhibitors of HMGB1-induced, TLR4 dependent TNFα production. The hit compounds emerging from the primary screen included several signal transduction pathway modifiers, such as the IκB phosphorylation inhibitor Bay 11-7085 and the Src/Syk kinase inhibitor MNS. These findings are consistent with a role of NF-κB and kinase activation in HMGB1-mediated cellular signaling. Glucocorticoids and beta-receptor agonist activators of intracellular cAMP (such as such as salbutamol, clenbuterol, metaproterenol, ethylnorepinephrine and ritodrine) were two most prominent drug classes emerging from the screen. Because of their therapeutic potential, and because of the endogenous physiological regulatory implications, these two classes of compounds were subject of follow-up studies (see below). Additional classes of hit compounds included the natural compounds, piperlongumine and parthenolide (the latter compound is known pharmacological actions as a NF-κB and MAP kinase inhibitor). The mechanism of action and potential anti-inflammatory utility of miscellaneous additional compounds that showed inhibitory effects - such as the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir, the local anesthetic lidocaine, the surfactant tyloxapol, the calcium antagonist prenylamine and the diuretic ethacrynic acid - requires further characterization. It is interesting to note that indinavir [18], tyloxapol [19] and lidocaine [20] have previously been demonstrated to suppress TNFα production in various experimental models in vitro, although the underlying molecular pathways have not been fully characterized. It is intriguing to speculate that these compounds may have additional, hitherto unrecognized, secondary modes of pharmacological action (as well as potential therapeutic utility) due to inhibition of HMGB1-mediated inflammatory responses.We identified several different activators of intracellular cAMP signaling as part of the screen for enhancers of the inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids. The enhancers exerted their effects their effects either through beta-adrenergic receptor agonism (such as salbutamol and salmeterol), through prolongation of the intracellular half-life of cAMP (such as the phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram) or by activating the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) (such as prostaglandin E1). While neither the glucocorticoids nor the cAMP-stimulating agents, on their own, produced a complete inhibition of HMGB1-mediated TNFα response, the combination of these two agents yielded a robust inhibition, and did so at low micromolar/nanomolar concentrations. Previous studies have demonstrated synergistic interactions between steroids and beta-agonists in various experimental systems in vitro and suggested that cAMP and glucocorticoids act via distinct upstream pathways, which activate transcription though separate hormone response elements, the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) element (GRE) and the cAMP-response element (CRE), respectively. The site of the synergistic convergence was identified at the level of inhibition of the promoter activation of various pro-inflammatory genes [21]–[23]. Based on our findings, at least some of the synergistic inhibition of HMGB1-induced signaling by the glucocorticoid/beta-agonist combination occurs upstream from NF-κB activation, upstream from GRE and CRE and upstream from the promoter region of the inflammatory genes studied.Our analysis of the gene expression profiles using a TLR signaling pathway array demonstrated that the synergistic inhibition of HMGB1-induced TNFα production by the glucocorticoid and the beta agonist does not represent a generalized phenomenon. In the case of several mediators, neither the glucocorticoid tested (e.g. Ccl2, Tlr2, Tlr9, Cd14, Cebpb, Csf3, Tlr8), nor the beta agonist tested (e.g. Il-1a, IL1b, IL6, Csf3, IL1r1) showed any inhibition. In some cases an enhancement was seen (IL1ra, Ptgs2, IL-10). These findings clearly demonstrate that HMGB1-mediated pro-inflammatory mediator production is regulated by glucocorticoids and by cAMP in a fashion that is specific to each gene product, and may be, at least in part, related to individual differences in the steroid and cAMP-responsive elements in individual promoters. Nevertheless, the combination of the beta agonist and the glucocorticoid resulted in a partial suppression for the majority of the genes studied, yielding a shift towards an overall anti-inflammatory phenotype (without suppressing the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10).HMGB1 signals through numerous receptors, depending upon the molecular conformation of the three cysteines [2], [12]–[14], [24]–[26]. For example, extracellular HMGB1 is post-translationally regulated via redox mechanisms, and the C23-C45 disulfideC106 thiol conformation binds to and activates the TLR4/MD2 receptor complex in the absence of LPS [12]–[14]. Here we utilized this recombinant conformation of HMGB1 (purified and characterized as previously described), which primarily signals through TLR4 to induce TNFα. Because RAGE and TLR2 are dispensable for this effect, our studies would not be expected to address signaling mediated through these receptors.Hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary axis, and the sympathetic and parasympathetic arms of the autonomic nervous system have powerful roles in the control of inflammation [27]–[31]. Adrenalectomy or pharmacological blockade of endogenous glucocorticoid receptors exacerbates [30], while beta-receptor activation suppresses systemic inflammatory responses [31]. Considering the fact that the biologically active concentrations of glucocorticoids and catecholamines in the current study are in the physiological range, we have also explored whether the HMGB1-mediated inflammatory responses are under the tonic control of these hormones. While the combination of exogenous glucocorticoid and beta agonist inhibited HMGB1-induced TNFα production (thereby extending the in vitro findings to an in vivo system), blockade of the endogenous glucocorticoid receptors with mifepristone or inhibition of the beta receptors with propranolol failed to potentiate the HMGB1-induced TNFα responses in vivo. Thus, circulating HMGB1 does not result in a more severe inflammatory response in subjects with impairment of their endogenous sympathetic-adrenal-medullary homeostasis, at least in the current in vivo experimental system.In summary, the current study unveils several drug-like modulators of HMGB1-mediated inflammatory responses and offers pharmacological directions for the therapeutic suppression of inflammatory responses in diseases driven by the HMGB1-TLR4 axis. Glucocorticoids remain a mainstay of therapy for rheumatoid arthritis, as well as many other inflammatory diseases. In rheumatoid arthritisHMGB1 has been shown to play a significant pathogenetic role [2], [3]. We hypothesize that the mode of the therapeutic action of glucocorticoids, in addition to inhibiting HMGB1 release [11], also involves an inhibition of HMGB1's downstream signaling action. Furthermore, we conclude that the synergistic administration of a glucocorticoid and a beta-receptor agonist or (another cAMP-elevating agent) is an effective approach to suppress HMGB1-mediated inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo.A full list of the genes investigated in the real-time PCR array experiments.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.A full list of the primary data produced by the primary cell-based screens.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: C Szabó; G Haskó; B Zingarelli; Z H Németh; A L Salzman; V Kvetan; S M Pastores; E S Vizi Journal: Immunology Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 7.397
Authors: O Hori; J Brett; T Slattery; R Cao; J Zhang; J X Chen; M Nagashima; E R Lundh; S Vijay; D Nitecki Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1995-10-27 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: A J Ghio; B C Marshall; J L Diaz; T Hasegawa; W Samuelson; D Povia; T P Kennedy; C A Piantodosi Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Luis Ulloa; Mahendar Ochani; Huan Yang; Mahira Tanovic; Daniel Halperin; Runkuan Yang; Christopher J Czura; Mitchell P Fink; Kevin J Tracey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-09-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: John P Pribis; Yousef Al-Abed; Huan Yang; Domokos Gero; Hongbo Xu; Marcelo F Montenegro; Eileen M Bauer; Sodam Kim; Sangeeta S Chavan; Changchun Cai; Tunliang Li; Petra Szoleczky; Csaba Szabo; Kevin J Tracey; Timothy R Billiar Journal: Mol Med Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Iris E Allijn; Stefan F C Vaessen; Linda C Quarles van Ufford; Kees J Beukelman; Menno P J de Winther; Gert Storm; Raymond M Schiffelers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 3.240