IMPORTANCE: The appearance of β-amyloidosis and brain injury biomarkers in cognitively normal (CN) persons is thought to define risk for the future development of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease (AD), but their interaction is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the joint presence of β-amyloidosis and brain injury biomarkers would lead to more rapid neurodegeneration. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-one CN persons (median age, 77 years; range, 71-93 years) in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who underwent magnetic resonance, fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) PET imaging at least twice 15 months apart. Participants were grouped according to the recommendations of the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer Association preclinical AD criteria based on the presence of β-amyloidosis, defined as a PiB PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) greater than 1.5, alone (stage 1) or with brain injury (stage 2 + 3), defined as hippocampal atrophy or FDG hypometabolism. We also studied a group of patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 17) or dementia (n = 9) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging or the Mayo Alzheimer Center with similar follow-up times who had undergone comparable imaging and had a PiB PET SUVr greater than 1.5. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rate of change of cortical volume on volumetric magnetic resonance images and rate of change of glucose metabolism on FDG PET scan results. RESULTS: There were 25 CN participants with both high PiB retention and low hippocampal volume or FDG hypometabolism at baseline (preclinical AD stages 2 + 3). On follow-up scans, the preclinical AD stage 2 + 3 participants had greater loss of medial temporal lobe volume and greater glucose hypometabolism in the medial temporal lobe compared with the other CN groups. The changes were similar to those in the cognitively impaired participants. Extratemporal regions did not show similar changes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher rates of medial temporal neurodegeneration occur in CN individuals who, on their initial scans, had abnormal levels of both β-amyloid and brain injury biomarkers. Although preclinical AD is currently only a research topic, the description of its brain structural changes will be critical for trials designed to prevent or forestall dementia due to AD.
IMPORTANCE: The appearance of β-amyloidosis and brain injury biomarkers in cognitively normal (CN) persons is thought to define risk for the future development of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease (AD), but their interaction is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the joint presence of β-amyloidosis and brain injury biomarkers would lead to more rapid neurodegeneration. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-one CN persons (median age, 77 years; range, 71-93 years) in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who underwent magnetic resonance, fludeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) PET imaging at least twice 15 months apart. Participants were grouped according to the recommendations of the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer Association preclinical AD criteria based on the presence of β-amyloidosis, defined as a PiB PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVr) greater than 1.5, alone (stage 1) or with brain injury (stage 2 + 3), defined as hippocampal atrophy or FDG hypometabolism. We also studied a group of patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 17) or dementia (n = 9) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging or the MayoAlzheimer Center with similar follow-up times who had undergone comparable imaging and had a PiB PET SUVr greater than 1.5. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rate of change of cortical volume on volumetric magnetic resonance images and rate of change of glucose metabolism on FDG PET scan results. RESULTS: There were 25 CN participants with both high PiB retention and low hippocampal volume or FDG hypometabolism at baseline (preclinical AD stages 2 + 3). On follow-up scans, the preclinical AD stage 2 + 3 participants had greater loss of medial temporal lobe volume and greater glucose hypometabolism in the medial temporal lobe compared with the other CN groups. The changes were similar to those in the cognitively impaired participants. Extratemporal regions did not show similar changes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher rates of medial temporal neurodegeneration occur in CN individuals who, on their initial scans, had abnormal levels of both β-amyloid and brain injury biomarkers. Although preclinical AD is currently only a research topic, the description of its brain structural changes will be critical for trials designed to prevent or forestall dementia due to AD.
Authors: C R Jack; M M Shiung; S D Weigand; P C O'Brien; J L Gunter; B F Boeve; D S Knopman; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; E G Tangalos; R C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-10-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Brian J Lopresti; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Jessica A Hoge; Scott K Ziolko; Xueling Lu; Carolyn C Meltzer; Kurt Schimmel; Nicholas D Tsopelas; Steven T DeKosky; Julie C Price Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: C D Smith; H Chebrolu; D R Wekstein; F A Schmitt; G A Jicha; G Cooper; W R Markesbery Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Julie C Price; William E Klunk; Brian J Lopresti; Xueling Lu; Jessica A Hoge; Scott K Ziolko; Daniel P Holt; Carolyn C Meltzer; Steven T DeKosky; Chester A Mathis Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Matthew L Senjem; Stephen D Weigand; Bradley J Kemp; Maria M Shiung; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Brain Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: C R Jack; M M Shiung; J L Gunter; P C O'Brien; S D Weigand; D S Knopman; B F Boeve; R J Ivnik; G E Smith; R H Cha; E G Tangalos; R C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-02-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Basil H Ridha; Josephine Barnes; Jonathan W Bartlett; Alison Godbolt; Tracey Pepple; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Jonathan M Schott; Nick C Fox; Chris Frost; Rachael I Scahill; John C Janssen; Dennis Chan; Rhian Jenkins; Martin N Rossor Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Miguel Ángel Araque Caballero; Matthias Brendel; Andreas Delker; Jinyi Ren; Axel Rominger; Peter Bartenstein; Martin Dichgans; Michael W Weiner; Michael Ewers Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; Gaël Chételat; Dennis Dickson; Anne M Fagan; Giovanni B Frisoni; William Jagust; Elizabeth C Mormino; Ronald C Petersen; Reisa A Sperling; Wiesje M van der Flier; Victor L Villemagne; Pieter J Visser; Stephanie J B Vos Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Helmet T Karim; Dana L Tudorascu; Ann Cohen; Julie C Price; Brian Lopresti; Chester Mathis; William Klunk; Beth E Snitz; Howard J Aizenstein Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Niklas Mattsson; Philip S Insel; Rachel Nosheny; Duygu Tosun; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Clifford R Jack; Michael C Donohue; Michael W Weiner Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Willem Huijbers; Elizabeth C Mormino; Sarah E Wigman; Andrew M Ward; Patrizia Vannini; Donald G McLaren; J Alex Becker; Aaron P Schultz; Trey Hedden; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Emily S Lundt; Stephen D Weigand; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Michelle M Mielke; Mary M Machulda; Rosebud O Roberts; Bradley F Boeve; David T Jones; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Lidia Sarro; Matthew L Senjem; Emily S Lundt; Scott A Przybelski; Timothy G Lesnick; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Bradley F Boeve; Val J Lowe; Tanis J Ferman; David S Knopman; Giancarlo Comi; Massimo Filippi; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Kejal Kantarci Journal: Brain Date: 2016-07-24 Impact factor: 13.501