Literature DB >> 23796349

Reducing intoxication among bar patrons: some lessons from prevention of drinking and driving.

Kathryn Graham1, Peter Miller, Tanya Chikritzhs, Mark A Bellis, John D Clapp, Karen Hughes, Traci L Toomey, Samantha Wells.   

Abstract

Intoxication in and around licensed premises continues to be common, despite widespread training in the responsible service of alcohol and laws prohibiting service to intoxicated individuals. However, research suggests that training and the existence of laws are unlikely to have an impact on intoxication without enforcement, and evidence from a number of countries indicates that laws prohibiting service to intoxicated individuals are rarely enforced. Enforcement is currently hampered by the lack of a standardized validated measure for defining intoxication clearly, a systematic approach to enforcement and the political will to address intoxication. We argue that adoption of key principles from successful interventions to prevent driving while intoxicated could be used to develop a model of consistent and sustainable enforcement. These principles include: applying validated and widely accepted criteria for defining when a person is 'intoxicated'; adopting a structure of enforceable consequences for violations; implementing procedures of unbiased enforcement; using publicity to ensure that there is a perceived high risk of being caught and punished; and developing the political will to support ongoing enforcement. Research can play a critical role in this process by: developing and validating criteria for defining intoxication based on observable behaviour; documenting the harms arising from intoxication, including risk curves associated with different levels of intoxication; estimating the policing, medical and social costs from intoxicated bar patrons; and conducting studies of the cost-effectiveness of different interventions to reduce intoxication.
© 2013 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enforcement; intoxication; licensed premises; prevention; responsible alcohol service

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23796349     DOI: 10.1111/add.12247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  5 in total

1.  Can Obviously Intoxicated Patrons Still Easily Buy Alcohol at On-Premise Establishments?

Authors:  Traci L Toomey; Kathleen M Lenk; Dawn M Nederhoff; Toben F Nelson; Alexandra M Ecklund; Keith J Horvath; Darin J Erickson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  What Proportion of On-Trade Alcohol Is Served to Those Who Are Already Potentially Intoxicated? An Analysis of Event-Level Data.

Authors:  John Holmes; Colin Angus; Alessandro Sasso; Abigail K Stevely; Petra S Meier
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.582

3.  A Group Randomized Trial of the Stop Service to Obviously-Impaired Patrons (S-STOP) Program to Prevent Overservice in Bars and Restaurants in College Communities.

Authors:  Joel W Grube; Brad S Krevor; William DeJong
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  Pre-drinking, alcohol consumption and related harms amongst Brazilian and British university students.

Authors:  Mariana G R Santos; Zila M Sanchez; Karen Hughes; Ivan Gee; Zara Quigg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does legislation to prevent alcohol sales to drunk individuals work? Measuring the propensity for night-time sales to drunks in a UK city.

Authors:  Karen Hughes; Mark A Bellis; Nicola Leckenby; Zara Quigg; Katherine Hardcastle; Olivia Sharples; David J Llewellyn
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.710

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.