Literature DB >> 23795799

When to perform lymph node dissection in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a novel approach to the preoperative assessment of risk of lymph node invasion at surgery and of lymph node progression during follow-up.

Umberto Capitanio1, Firas Abdollah, Rayan Matloob, Nazareno Suardi, Fabio Castiglione, Ettore Di Trapani, Paolo Capogrosso, Andrea Gallina, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Francesco Montorsi, Roberto Bertini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperatively patients who might benefit from lymph node dissection (LND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed lymph node invasion (LNI) at final pathology and lymph node (LN) progression during the follow-up for 1983 patients with RCC, treated with either partial or radical nephrectomy. LN progression was defined as the onset of a new clinically detected lymphadenopathy (>10 mm) in the retroperitoneal lymphatic area. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effect of each potential clinical predictor (age, body mass index, tumour side, symptoms, performance status, clinical tumour size, clinical tumour-node-metastasis stage, and albumin, calcium, creatinine, haemoglobin and platelet levels) on the outcome of interest. The most parsimonious multivariable predictive model was developed, and discrimination, calibration and net benefit were calculated.
RESULTS: The prevalence of LNI was 6.1% (120/1983 patients) and during the follow-up period, 82 patients (4.1%) experienced LN progression. On multivariable analyses, the most informative independent predictors were tumour stage (cT3-4 vs cT1-2, odds ratio [OR] 1.52, P = 0.05), clinical nodal status [cN1 vs cN0, OR 7.09, P < 0.001], metastases at diagnosis (OR 3.04, P < 0.001) and clinical tumour size (OR 1.14, P < 0.001). The accuracy of the multivariable model was found to be 86.9%, with excellent calibration and net benefit at decision-curve analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: By relying on a unique approach, combining the risk of harbouring LNI and/or LN progression during the follow-up period, we have provided the first clinical presurgery model predicting the need for LND.
© 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795799     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  17 in total

1.  Valuation of lymph node dissection in localized high-risk renal cell cancer using X-tile software.

Authors:  Wei Zhuang; Jiabi Chen; Yining Li; Weihui Liu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Development and external validation of a pathological nodal staging score for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Malte Rieken; Stephen A Boorjian; Luis A Kluth; Umberto Capitanio; Alberto Briganti; R Houston Thompson; Bradley C Leibovich; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Vitaly Margulis; Jay D Raman; Mikhail Regelman; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Morgan Rouprêt; Mohammad Abufaraj; Beat Foerster; Mithat Gönen; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Glen W Barrisford; Boris Gershman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Trends and outcomes of lymphadenectomy for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma: A propensity score-weighted analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Nicholas J Farber; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Sinae Kim; Brian Shinder; Kushan Radadia; Joshua Sterling; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Tina M Mayer; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  Accuracy of clinical nodal staging and factors associated with receipt of lymph node dissection at the time of surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kushan D Radadia; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Sinae Kim; Nicholas J Farber; Joshua Sterling; Marissa Falkiewicz; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for High Risk, Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of the ASSURE (ECOG-ACRIN 2805) Adjuvant Trial.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Judi Manola; Naomi B Haas; Daniel Y C Heng; Edward M Messing; Christopher G Wood; Christopher J Kane; Robert S DiPaola; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  The rationale and the role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  The contemporary role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Paul Russo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-08-20

Review 9.  Management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah P Psutka; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-08

10.  Predictive and prognostic effect of inflammatory lymphadenopathies in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabio Muttin; Angela Pecoraro; Alessandro Larcher; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Alessandro Nini; Francesco Cianflone; Francesco Trevisani; Federico Dehò; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi; Roberto Bertini; Umberto Capitanio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.