Literature DB >> 23795788

Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate vs transvesical prostatectomy for prostate volumes >80 mL: a prospective randomized study.

Rubiao Ou1, Xiangrong Deng, Wenjun Yang, Xinghua Wei, Hui Chen, Keji Xie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate (TUERP) and transvesical prostatectomy (TVP) for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate volumes >80 mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients with urodynamic obstruction and prostate volume >80 mL were prospectively randomized and enrolled in the study at a tertiary hospital. Patients underwent TVP or TUERP performed by one of two surgeons with experience of a large number of cases. All patients were preoperatively evaluated using patient age, prostate volume measurement, clinical characteristics of digital rectal examination, self-assessment using the International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) questionnaire, a quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ), post-void residual urine volume (PVR), urine analysis, blood sample analysis, including determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and haemoglobin concentration. All patients were assessed peri-operatively and postoperatively at 3 and 12 months. All complications were documented.
RESULTS: Of 100 patients eligible to participate, 92 patients completed 12 months of follow-up. Patients who underwent TUERP had shorter catheterization times and hospital stays. Operation duration was not significantly different between the two surgical groups (P = 0.107). The resected adenoma weight in the TVP group was more than that in the TUERP group, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.062). There were no significant differences in IPSS, PVR, Qmax or QoL scores between the groups at 3 and 12 months. The patients in the TVP group appeared to have a better Qmax at 3 months, however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.081). Adverse events were similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: We found that TUERP had efficacy and safety equivalent to that of TVP for patients with BPH and prostate volume >80 mL.
© 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795788     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  13 in total

Review 1.  Transurethral enucleation of the prostate versus transvesical open prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Youcheng Lin; Xun Wu; Abai Xu; Rui Ren; Xueqiong Zhou; Yong Wen; Yong Zou; Mancheng Gong; Chunxiao Liu; Zexuan Su; Thomas R W Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large volume prostates: preliminary 6-month safety and efficacy results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  B Becker; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross; C Netsch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Preoperative risk factors of postoperative delirium after transurethral prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Sheng Tai; Lingfan Xu; Li Zhang; Song Fan; Chaozhao Liang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

4.  Did prostate size affect the complication and outcome of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate?

Authors:  Jian-Ming Rao; Heng-Jun Xiao; Yi-Xin Ren; Ping Ding; Jiang He; Yong-Li Yan; Jing-Hua Yang; Jin-Rui Yang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  A prospective, randomized trial comparing thulium vapoenucleation with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction: perioperative safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Christopher Netsch; B Becker; C Tiburtius; C Moritz; A Venneri Becci; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Dual-centre randomized-controlled trial comparing transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using diode laser vs. bipolar plasmakinetic for the treatment of LUTS secondary of benign prostate obstruction: 1-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Zhihui Zou; Abai Xu; Shaobo Zheng; Binshen Chen; Yawen Xu; Hulin Li; Chongyang Duan; Junhong Zheng; Jiasheng Chen; Chaoming Li; Yiming Wang; Yubo Gao; Chaozhao Liang; Chunxiao Liu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy in the era of laser enucleation for high-volume prostates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Josselin Abi Chebel; Julien Sarkis; Elie El Helou; Elie Hanna; Georges Abi Tayeh; Albert Semaan
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-08-11

8.  Endoscopic enucleation versus open prostatectomy for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Maoyin Li; Jianguang Qiu; Qi Hou; Dejuan Wang; Wentao Huang; Cheng Hu; Ke Li; Xin Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prostate resected weight and postoperative prostate cancer incidence after transurethral resection of the prostate: A population-based study.

Authors:  Fu-Chao Liu; Kuo-Chun Hua; Jr-Rung Lin; See-Tong Pang; Huang-Ping Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Bipolar transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate versus bipolar resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 60gr: A retrospective study at a single academic tertiary care center.

Authors:  Yong Wei; Ning Xu; Shao-Hao Chen; Xiao-Dong Li; Qing-Shui Zheng; Yun-Zhi Lin; Xue-Yi Xue
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.