Literature DB >> 23795764

Impaired retrieval monitoring for past and future autobiographical events in older adults.

Ian M McDonough1, David A Gallo.   

Abstract

Older adults are more likely than younger adults to confuse real and imagined events in episodic memory. This deficit may be attributed to a reduction in the specific features available for recollection (i.e., retrieval success) or to a deficit in the search and decision processes operating during recollection attempts (i.e., retrieval monitoring). The present experiments used a two-phase event-generation task to manipulate retrieval success and test for age-related deficits in retrieval monitoring. In the first phase, participants generated real autobiographical events from their past and imagined plausible future events in response to cue words. We used elaboration instructions to experimentally manipulate the amount of features associated with these generated events. In the second phase administered 24 hours later, we gave recollection tests that required participants to discriminate between these previously generated past and future events in memory. As predicted, the elaboration manipulation increased the amount of features that could be recollected in association with the generated events in both age groups (including cognitive operations in Experiment 1 and perceptual details in Experiment 2). However, older adults were more likely than younger adults to confuse past and future events in memory, and critically, elaboration did not minimize these age-related confusions. These findings imply that aging impairs the ability to accurately monitor retrieval for features that are characteristic of autobiographical events, above and beyond age-related impairments in the retrieval of the recollected information itself. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795764      PMCID: PMC3783658          DOI: 10.1037/a0032732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  25 in total

1.  Older adults encode--but do not always use--perceptual details: intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments.

Authors:  Wilma Koutstaal
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

2.  Retrieval Expectations Affect False Recollection: Insights from a Criterial Recollection Task.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-01

3.  Involuntary (spontaneous) mental time travel into the past and future.

Authors:  Dorthe Berntsen; Anne Staerk Jacobsen
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2008-12

4.  Separating past and future autobiographical events in memory: evidence for a reality monitoring asymmetry.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

5.  Illusory expectations can affect retrieval-monitoring accuracy.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; David A Gallo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  The role of past in the simulation of autobiographical future episodes.

Authors:  Nadia Gamboz; Maria A Brandimonte; Stefania De Vito
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2010

7.  More data-driven processing at retrieval reduces age-related memory deficits.

Authors:  Lucie Angel; Séverine Fay; Badiâa Bouazzaoui; Michel Isingrini
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2010-06

8.  Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory.

Authors:  Demis Hassabis; Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Aging, source, and decision criteria: when false fame errors do and do not occur.

Authors:  K S Multhaup
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-09

10.  Aging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval.

Authors:  Brian Levine; Eva Svoboda; Janine F Hay; Gordon Winocur; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-12
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  A four-component model of age-related memory change.

Authors:  M Karl Healey; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Age-related differences in the neural basis of the subjective vividness of memories: evidence from multivoxel pattern classification.

Authors:  Marcia K Johnson; Brice A Kuhl; Karen J Mitchell; Elizabeth Ankudowich; Kelly A Durbin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The Effects of Age on the Neural Correlates of Recollection Success, Recollection-Related Cortical Reinstatement, and Post-Retrieval Monitoring.

Authors:  Tracy H Wang; Jeffrey D Johnson; Marianne de Chastelaine; Brian E Donley; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Cognitive Reserve Moderates Older Adults' Memory Errors in Autobiographical Reality Monitoring Task.

Authors:  Kyle R Kraemer; Tasnuva Enam; Ian M McDonough
Journal:  Psychol Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-17

5.  Looking on the Bright Side: Aging and the Impact of Emotional Future Simulation on Subsequent Memory.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 6.  False memories with age: Neural and cognitive underpinnings.

Authors:  Aleea L Devitt; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Multielement Episodic Encoding in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Taylor James; M Natasha Rajah; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Age effects in autobiographical memory depend on the measure.

Authors:  Ali Mair; Marie Poirier; Martin A Conway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Memory's aging echo: age-related decline in neural reactivation of perceptual details during recollection.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; Sasha N Cervantes; Stephen J Gray; David A Gallo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Retrospective Reports of Negative Early Life Events Over a 4-Year Period: A Test of Measurement Invariance and Response Consistency.

Authors:  Liat Ayalon
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.