Literature DB >> 20371428

The role of past in the simulation of autobiographical future episodes.

Nadia Gamboz1, Maria A Brandimonte, Stefania De Vito.   

Abstract

Human beings' ability to envisage the future has been recently assumed to rely on the reconstructive nature of episodic memory (Schacter & Addis, 2007). In the present research, young adults mentally reexperienced and preexperienced temporally close and distant autobiographical episodes, and rated their phenomenal characteristics as well as their novelty. Additionally, they performed a delayed recognition task including remember-know judgments on new, old-remember, and old-imagine words. Results showed that past and future temporally close episodes included more phenomenal details than distant episodes, in line with earlier studies. However, future events were occasionally rated as already occurred in the past. Furthermore, in the recognition task, participants falsely attributed old-imagine words to remembered episodes. While partially in line with previous results, these findings call for a more subtle analysis in order to discriminate representations of past episodes from true future events simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20371428     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  6 in total

1.  Inducing involuntary and voluntary mental time travel using a laboratory paradigm.

Authors:  Scott N Cole; Søren R Staugaard; Dorthe Berntsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

2.  Impaired retrieval monitoring for past and future autobiographical events in older adults.

Authors:  Ian M McDonough; David A Gallo
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-06

3.  A Neural Mechanism for Reward Discounting: Insights from Modeling Hippocampal-Striatal Interactions.

Authors:  Patryk A Laurent
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.418

Review 4.  The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis; Demis Hassabis; Victoria C Martin; R Nathan Spreng; Karl K Szpunar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.

Authors:  Elise Fenn; Mollie McGuire; Sara Langben; Iris Blandón-Gitlin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-31

6.  Episodic future thinking in semantic dementia: a cognitive and FMRI study.

Authors:  Armelle Viard; Pascale Piolino; Serge Belliard; Vincent de La Sayette; Béatrice Desgranges; Francis Eustache
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.