Literature DB >> 23795663

Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.

Peter Vilmann1, Adrian Săftoiu, Stephan Hollerbach, Birgit Guldhammer Skov, Dorte Linnemann, Carmen Florina Popescu, Axel Wellmann, Florin Gorunescu, Paul Clementsen, Ulrich Freund, Peer Flemming, Hazem Hassan, Dan Ionuţ Gheonea, Liliana Streba, Ana Maria Ioncică, Costin Teodor Streba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Few randomized studies have assessed the clinical performance of 25-gauge (25G) needles compared with 22-gauge (22G) needles during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) biopsy of intra-abdominal lesions. We aimed to compare the diagnostic yield, as well as performance characteristics of 22G versus 25G EUS biopsy needles by determining their diagnostic capabilities, the number of needle passes as well as cellularity of aspirated tissue specimen.
METHODS: The study is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Patients were referred between January 2009 and January 2010 for diagnostic EUS including EUS-guided FNA of different lesions adjacent to the upper GI tract. All patients were randomized to EUS-FNA performed with either a 22G or 25G aspiration needle.
RESULTS: EUS-FNA was performed in 135 patients (62 patients with a 22G needle). Sensitivity and specificity of the 22G needle was 94.1% and 95.8%, respectively, and for the 25G needle 94.1% and 100%, respectively. Investigators reported better visualization and performance for the 22G needle compared to the 25G (p < 0.0001). The number of tissue slides obtained was higher for the 22G needle during the second and third needle passes (p < 0.05). We did not observe significant differences between the number and preservation status of obtained cells (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant difference was found between the two types of needles in terms of reduced visualization of the 25G needle and suboptimal performance rating. However, this did not impact on overall results since both needles were equally successful in terms of a high diagnostic yield and overall accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23795663     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2013.799222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  15 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Elisa Stasi; Marianna Di Maso; Gaetano Serviddio; Mohammed Salah Ali Hussein; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  25-gauge histology needle versus 22-gauge cytology needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Georgios Mavrogenis; Birgit Weynand; Alain Sibille; Hocine Hassaini; Pierre Deprez; Cédric Gillain; Philippe Warzée
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-12-12

3.  Idiopathic granulomatous gastritis diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: report of a case.

Authors:  Koh Imbe; Atsushi Irisawa; Goro Shibukawa; Yoko Abe; Akiko Saito; Koki Hoshi; Akane Yamabe; Ryo Igarashi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-10-24

Review 4.  Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review of Technical and Procedural Variables.

Authors:  Bhairvi S Jani; Fadi Rzouq; Shreyas Saligram; Diego Lim; Amit Rastogi; John Bonino; Mojtaba Olyaee
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-01

5.  Comparison of two different size needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis of prospective controlled trials.

Authors:  Mei-Mei Xu; Hong-Yu Jia; Li-Li Yan; Shan-Shan Li; Yue Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Basic technique for solid lesions: Cytology, core, or both?

Authors:  Shantel Hébert-Magee
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  The role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA in the management of subepithelial lesions of the esophagus: A large, single-center experience.

Authors:  Birol Baysal; Omar A Masri; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Hakan Senturk
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 8.  A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hugo Gonçalo Guedes; Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura; Ralph Braga Duarte; Martin Andres Coronel Cordero; Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos; Spencer Cheng; Sergio Eiji Matuguma; Dalton Marques Chaves; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions guided by endoscopic ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Antonio Facciorusso; Matteo Martina; Rosario Vincenzo Buccino; Maurizio Cosimo Nacchiero; Nicola Muscatiello
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-07

10.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) Using 22-gauge and 25-gauge Needles for Pancreatic Masses.

Authors:  Guo Tian; Haiwei Bao; Ju Li; Tian'an Jiang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.