Literature DB >> 23793873

Fractional flow reserve as the reference standard for myocardial perfusion studies: fool's gold?

Sven Plein1, Manish Motwani.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23793873     DOI： 10.1093/ehjci/jet110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN： 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: does coronary pressure never lie?

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn A van Lavieren; José P S Henriques; Jan J Piek; Bimmer E P M Claessen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

3.  Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Timothy M Bateman; Rob S Beanlands; Daniel S Berman; Salvador Borges-Neto; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert A deKemp; E Gordon DePuey; Vasken Dilsizian; Sharmila Dorbala; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia; Henry Gewirtz; Gary V Heller; Howard C Lewin; Saurabh Malhotra; April Mann; Terrence D Ruddy; Thomas H Schindler; Ronald G Schwartz; Piotr J Slomka; Prem Soman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Andrew Einstein; Raymond Russell; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Assessing the Haemodynamic Impact of Coronary Artery Stenoses: Intracoronary Flow Versus Pressure Measurements.

Authors:  Valérie E Stegehuis; Gilbert Wm Wijntjens; Tadashi Murai; Jan J Piek; Tim P van de Hoef
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2018-08

Review 5.  Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging.

Authors:  Sung Min Ko; Hweung Kon Hwang; Sung Mok Kim; Ihn Ho Cho
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Sinogram smoothing techniques for myocardial blood flow estimation from dose-reduced dynamic computed tomography.

Authors:  Dimple Modgil; Adam M Alessio; Michael D Bindschadler; Patrick J La Rivière
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-03

7.  Incremental cost-effectiveness of dobutamine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients at intermediate risk for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  George Petrov; Sebastian Kelle; Eckart Fleck; Ernst Wellnhofer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Waqas Ullah; Sohaib Roomi; Hafez M Abdullah; Maryam Mukhtar; Zain Ali; Ping Ye; Donald C Haas; Vincent M Figueredo
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2020-05-03

9.  Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs 15O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Michelle C Williams; Saeed Mirsadraee; Marc R Dweck; Nicholas W Weir; Alison Fletcher; Christophe Lucatelli; Tom MacGillivray; Saroj K Golay; Nicholas L Cruden; Peter A Henriksen; Neal Uren; Graham McKillop; João A C Lima; John H Reid; Edwin J R van Beek; Dilip Patel; David E Newby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.