Literature DB >> 23792128

Quantification of tissue shrinkage and dehydration caused by microwave ablation: experimental study in kidneys for the estimation of effective coagulation volume.

Christof M Sommer1, Steffen A Sommer, Theresa Mokry, Theresa Gockner, Daniel Gnutzmann, Nadine Bellemann, Anne Schmitz, Boris A Radeleff, Hans U Kauczor, Ulrike Stampfl, Philippe L Pereira.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the extent of tissue shrinkage and dehydration caused by microwave (MW) ablation in kidneys for estimation of effective coagulation volume.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MW ablations were carried out in ex vivo porcine kidneys. Six study groups were defined: groups 1A, 2A, and 3A for MW ablation (90 W for 5 min, 7.5 min, or 10 min), and groups 1B, 2B, and 3B for control (without MW ablation). Pre- and postinterventional volume analyses were performed. Effective coagulation volumes (original tissue included in coagulation) were determined. Postinterventional dehydration analyses were performed with calculation of mean mass fractions of water.
RESULTS: Mean deployed energies were 21.6 kJ ± 1.1 for group 1A, 29.9 kJ ± 1.0 for group 2A, and 42.1 kJ ± 0.5 kJ for group 3A, and were significantly different (P < .0001). Differences between pre- and postinterventional volumes were -3.8% ± 0.6 for group 1A, -5.6% ± 0.9 for group 2A, and -7.2% ± 0.4 for group 3A, and -1.1% ± 0.3 for group 1B, -1.8% ± 0.4 for group 2B, and -1.1% ± 0.4 for group 3B. Postinterventional volumes were significantly smaller than preinterventional volumes for all groups (P < .01). Underestimations of effective coagulation volume from visualized coagulation volume were 26.1% ± 3.5 for group 1A, 35.2% ± 11.2 for group 2A, and 42.1% ± 4.9 for group 3A, which were significantly different (P < .01). Mean mass fractions of water were 64.2% ± 1.4 for group 1A, 63.2% ± 1.7 for group 2A, and 62.6% ± 1.8% for group 3A, with significant differences versus corresponding control groups (P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: For MW ablation in kidneys, underestimation of effective coagulation volume based on visualized coagulation volume is significantly greater with greater deployed energy. Therefore, local dehydration with tissue shrinkage is a potential contributor.
Copyright © 2013 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AKS; MW; RF; appearance of kidney surface; microwave; radiofrequency

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23792128     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  15 in total

Review 1.  Microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Guido Poggi; Nevio Tosoratti; Benedetta Montagna; Chiara Picchi
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-08

2.  Numerical simulation of microwave ablation incorporating tissue contraction based on thermal dose.

Authors:  Dong Liu; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  CT imaging during microwave ablation: analysis of spatial and temporal tissue contraction.

Authors:  Dong Liu; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Microwave ablation of malignant renal tumours: intermediate-term results and usefulness of RENAL and mRENAL scores for predicting outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ierardi; Alessio Puliti; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Mario Petrillo; Ejona Duka; Chiara Floridi; Michela Lecchi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  High-powered microwave ablation of t1a renal cell carcinoma: safety and initial clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Anna J Moreland; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Sara L Best; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Marci L Alexander; Christopher L Brace; Douglas R Kitchin; Sean P Hedican; Stephen Y Nakada; Fred T Lee; E Jason Abel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Experimental assessment of microwave ablation computational modeling with MR thermometry.

Authors:  Pegah Faridi; Paul Keselman; Hojjatollah Fallahi; Punit Prakash
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Assessing ablation margins of FDG-avid liver tumors during PET/CT-guided thermal ablation procedures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Leigh C Casadaban; Paul J Catalano; Leslie K Lee; Hyewon Hyun; Kemal Tuncali; Victor H Gerbaudo; Paul B Shyn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Outcomes of Microwave Ablation for Small Renal Masses: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Courtney Yong; Sarah L Mott; Sandeep Laroia; Chad R Tracy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Microwave ablation of renal tumors: state of the art and development trends.

Authors:  Chiara Floridi; Irene De Bernardi; Federico Fontana; Alessandra Muollo; Anna Maria Ierardi; Andrea Agostini; Paolo Fonio; Ettore Squillaci; Luca Brunese; Carlo Fugazzola; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Dynamics of tissue shrinkage during ablative temperature exposures.

Authors:  Christian Rossmann; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Frank Rattay; Dieter Haemmerich
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.833

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.