OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the motor experiences of daily living section of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS M-EDL) for assessing disability in PD patients; to determine the association between disability and quality of life; and to identify cut-off score ranges for no, mild, moderate and severe disability with this measure. METHODS: International, observational, cross-sectional study of 435 PD patients, assessed with: MDS-UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr staging, Rapid Assessment of Disability Scale, Clinical Impression of Severity Index for PD, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 and EQ-5D. Descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparisons, ordinal logistic regression analysis for setting cut-off values and a step-wise multiple linear regression model were calculated. RESULTS: MDS-UPDRS M-EDL correlated 0.70-0.80 with other disability measures, and -0.46 to 0.74 with quality of life scales. Scores significantly increased with higher disease duration and severity (p < 0.001). Cut-off values for the M-EDL were: 0-2 points, no disability; 3-16, mild; 17-31, moderate; and 32 points or more, severe. Linear regression analysis identified the MDS-UPDRS nM-EDL section as the main determinant of M-EDL, followed by the rest of MDS-UPDRS sections (explained variance: 59%). CONCLUSIONS: MDS-UPDRS M-EDL proved to be useful for assessing disability in PD.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the motor experiences of daily living section of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS M-EDL) for assessing disability in PDpatients; to determine the association between disability and quality of life; and to identify cut-off score ranges for no, mild, moderate and severe disability with this measure. METHODS: International, observational, cross-sectional study of 435 PDpatients, assessed with: MDS-UPDRS, Hoehn and Yahr staging, Rapid Assessment of Disability Scale, Clinical Impression of Severity Index for PD, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 and EQ-5D. Descriptive statistics, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients, Kruskal-Wallis test for group comparisons, ordinal logistic regression analysis for setting cut-off values and a step-wise multiple linear regression model were calculated. RESULTS: MDS-UPDRS M-EDL correlated 0.70-0.80 with other disability measures, and -0.46 to 0.74 with quality of life scales. Scores significantly increased with higher disease duration and severity (p < 0.001). Cut-off values for the M-EDL were: 0-2 points, no disability; 3-16, mild; 17-31, moderate; and 32 points or more, severe. Linear regression analysis identified the MDS-UPDRS nM-EDL section as the main determinant of M-EDL, followed by the rest of MDS-UPDRS sections (explained variance: 59%). CONCLUSIONS: MDS-UPDRS M-EDL proved to be useful for assessing disability in PD.
Authors: Jesse M Cedarbaum; Diane Stephenson; Richard Rudick; Maria C Carrillo; Glenn Stebbins; Douglas Kerr; Jill Heemskerk; Wendy R Galpern; Petra Kaufmann; David Cella; Maria Isaac; Marc K Walton Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Liis Kadastik-Eerme; Marika Rosenthal; Tiiu Paju; Mari Muldmaa; Pille Taba Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Carmen Rodríguez-Blázquez; Mario Alvarez; Tomoko Arakaki; Víctor Campos Arillo; Pedro Chaná; William Fernández; Nélida Garretto; Juan Carlos Martínez-Castrillo; Mayela Rodríguez-Violante; Marcos Serrano-Dueñas; Diego Ballesteros; Jose Manuel Rojo-Abuin; Kallol Ray Chaudhuri; Marcelo Merello; Pablo Martínez-Martín Journal: Mov Disord Clin Pract Date: 2017-01-05
Authors: Christian Geroin; Carlo Alberto Artusi; Marialuisa Gandolfi; Elisabetta Zanolin; Roberto Ceravolo; Marianna Capecci; Elisa Andrenelli; Maria Gabriella Ceravolo; Laura Bonanni; Marco Onofrj; Roberta Telese; Giulia Bellavita; Mauro Catalan; Paolo Manganotti; Sonia Mazzucchi; Sara Giannoni; Laura Vacca; Fabrizio Stocchi; Miriam Casali; Cristian Falup-Pecurariu; Maurizio Zibetti; Alfonso Fasano; Leonardo Lopiano; Michele Tinazzi Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 4.003