Literature DB >> 23791011

Re-admission to Level 2 unit after hip-fracture surgery - Risk factors, reasons and outcome.

Benjamin Buecking1, Daphne Eschbach, Christos Koutras, Thomas Kratz, Monika Balzer-Geldsetzer, Richard Dodel, Steffen Ruchholtz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are common geriatric fractures with increasing incidence. Treatment of these fractures is still associated with high rates of complications and poor outcome. Data concerning unexpected re-admission to a Level 2 unit after an initial inconspicuous postoperative course are limited. We aimed to identify causes and associated risk factors for admission as well as impact of re-admission on acute care and short-term outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients over 60 years of age with hip fractures were included in this prospective single-centre observational study. Patients with polytrauma or malignancy-associated fractures were excluded. Age, gender, fracture type, pre-fracture residential, physical and cognitive status, recording to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Barthel Index (BI) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were recorded on admission. Date, type of surgery and operation time were evaluated. Postoperatively, the prevalence of and reasons for unexpected re-admission to the Level 2 unit and patients' outcome were measured. Parameters were hospital mortality, BI at discharge, length of stay in hospital and type of discharge. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for admission to the Level 2 unit and influence on patients' outcome.
RESULTS: Out of 402 included patients, 48 (12%) were re-admitted to the Level 2 unit. The most frequent reasons were non-surgical (n=38), such as respiratory failure (n=12), cardiovascular diseases (n=8) and acute renal failure (n=5). Ten patients were re-admitted due to a revision surgery of the hip. We identified two independent risk factors for readmission: male gender (odds ratio (OR)=2.38, confidence interval (95% CI)=1.10-5.15, p=0.027) and type of fracture, especially femoral neck fracture (OR=7.40, 95% CI=2.39-23.26, p=0.001). Patients who were re-admitted to the Level 2 unit had a higher mortality (β=2.09, OR=8.07, 95% CI=2.44-26.75, p=0.001), an increase in hospital stay (β=7.0, 95% CI 5.2-8.7, p<0.001) and a lower functional outcome (BI, β=-17, 95% CI=-23 to -10, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Unexpected admission to the Level 2 unit in the post-surgical period is a frequent phenomenon in geriatric hip-fracture patients. Males and femoral neck fracture patients seem to be especially endangered. Although the majority of reasons for admissions were not immediately life-threatening illnesses, they had a substantial negative impact on patients' outcome. This emphasises the importance of careful handling of this frail patient population.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Function; Geriatric fracture; Higher level of care; Hip fracture; Intensive care; Mortality; Outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23791011     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  10 in total

1.  Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Benjamin Buecking; Christoph Kolja Boese; Verena Anna Bergmeister; Michael Frink; Steffen Ruchholtz; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The impact of pre-existing conditions on functional outcome and mortality in geriatric hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Christopher Bliemel; Benjamin Buecking; Ludwig Oberkircher; Matthias Knobe; Steffen Ruchholtz; Daphne Eschbach
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Examining trajectories of hospital readmission in older adults hospitalised with hip fracture from residential aged care and the community.

Authors:  Vu Quang Do; Brian Draper; Lara Harvey; Tim Driscoll; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Henry Brodaty; Rebecca Mitchell
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Does integrity of the lesser trochanter influence the surgical outcome of intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients?

Authors:  Xiaohui Liu; Yueju Liu; Shuo Pan; Huijian Cao; Dahai Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Mortality and complications after hip fracture among elderly patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jeff Chien-Fu Lin; Wen-Miin Liang
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Mortality, readmission, and reoperation after hip fracture in nonagenarians.

Authors:  Jeff Chien-Fu Lin; Wen-Miin Liang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Financial Implications of Hospital Readmission After Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Stephen L Kates; Edward Shields; Caleb Behrend; Katia K Noyes
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-09

8.  Outcomes after fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fracture compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture among the elderly.

Authors:  Jeff Chien-Fu Lin; Wen-Miin Liang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 9.  Risk factors for hospital re-presentation among older adults following fragility fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saira A Mathew; Elise Gane; Kristiann C Heesch; Steven M McPhail
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Effectiveness of a Day Rehabilitation Program in Improving Functional Outcome and Reducing Mortality and Readmission of Elderly Patients With Fragility Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Tak Man Wong; Frankie K L Leung; Tak Wing Lau; Christian Fang; Felix H W Chan; Jun Wu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2018-05-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.