Literature DB >> 23789161

Kaiser Permanente implant registries benefit patient safety, quality improvement, cost-effectiveness.

Elizabeth W Paxton1, Mary-Lou Kiley, Rebecca Love, Thomas C Barber, Tadashi T Funahashi, Maria C S Inacio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In response to the increased volume, risk, and cost of medical devices, in 2001 Kaiser Permanente (KP) developed implant registries to enhance patient safety and quality, and to evaluate cost-effectiveness.
METHODS: Using an integrated electronic health record system, administrative databases, and other institutional databases, orthopedic, cardiology, and vascular implant registries were developed in 2001, 2006, and 2011, respectively. These registries monitor patients, implants, clinical practices, and surgical outcomes for KP's 9 million members. Critical to registry success is surgeon leadership and engagement; each geographical region has a surgeon champion who provides feedback on registry initiatives and disseminates registry findings.
RESULTS: The registries enhance patient safety by providing a variety of clinical decision tools such as risk calculators, quality reports, risk-adjusted medical center reports, summaries of surgeon data, and infection control reports to registry stakeholders. The registries are used to immediately identify patients with recalled devices, evaluate new and established device technology, and identify outlier implants. The registries contribute to cost-effectiveness initiatives through collaboration with sourcing and contracting groups and confirming adherence to device formulary guidelines. Research studies based on registry data have directly influenced clinical best practices.
CONCLUSIONS: Registries are important tools to evaluate longitudinal device performance and safety, study the clinical indications for and outcomes of device implantation, respond promptly to recalls and advisories, and contribute to the overall high quality of care of our patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23789161     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39033-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  23 in total

1.  Are There Modifiable Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a US Healthcare System?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Jasvinder A Singh; Rebecca Love; Stefano A Bini; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk.

Authors:  Dhiren Sheth; Guy Cafri; Maria C S Inacio; Elizabeth W Paxton; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Big data, miniregistries: a rapid-turnaround solution to get quality improvement data into the hands of medical specialists.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Liyan Liu; Andrea Altschuler; Richard Dell; Violeta Rabrenovich; Amy L Compton-Phillips
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Femoral-tibial fixation affects risk of revision and reoperation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft.

Authors:  Lindsey M Spragg; Heather A Prentice; Andrew Morris; Tadashi T Funahashi; Gregory B Maletis; Rick P Csintalan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Pediatric Hip Fractures in California: Results from a Community-Based Hip Fracture Registry.

Authors:  Heather A Prentice; Elizabeth W Paxton; Jessica J Hunt; Christopher D Grimsrud; Jennifer M Weiss
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

6.  Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Steven Kurtz; Rebecca Love; Guy Cafri; Robert S Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Metal-on-conventional polyethylene total hip arthroplasty bearing surfaces have a higher risk of revision than metal-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene: results from a US registry.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Robert S Namba; Rebecca Love; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Association of Type and Frequency of Postsurgery Care with Revision Surgery after Total Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Heather A Prentice; Priscilla H Chan; Robert S Namba; Maria Cs Inacio; Art Sedrakyan; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-10-11

9.  Clinical research informatics and electronic health record data.

Authors:  R L Richesson; M M Horvath; S A Rusincovitch
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

10.  Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Paxton; Maria C S Inacio; Monti Khatod; Eric Yue; Tadashi Funahashi; Thomas Barber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.