Literature DB >> 23784992

The differences in binding 12-carbon aliphatic ligands by bovine β-lactoglobulin isoform A and B studied by isothermal titration calorimetry and X-ray crystallography.

Joanna I Loch1, Piotr Bonarek, Agnieszka Polit, Śylwia Swiątek, Marta Dziedzicka-Wasylewska, Krzysztof Lewiński.   

Abstract

Isoforms A (LGB-A) and B (LGB-B) of bovine lactoglobulin, the milk protein, differ in positions 64 (D↔G) and 118 (V↔A). Interactions of LGB-A and LGB-B with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride (DTAC) and lauric acid (LA), 12-carbon ligands possessing differently charged polar groups, were investigated using isothermal titration calorimetry and X-ray crystallography, to study the proton linkage phenomenon and to distinguish between effects related to different isoforms and different ligand properties. The determined values of ΔS and ΔH revealed that for all ligands, binding is entropically driven. The contribution from enthalpy change is lower and shows strong dependence on type of buffer that indicates proton release from the protein varying with protein isoform and ligand type and involvement of LA and Asp64 (in isoform A) in this process. The ligand affinities for both isoforms were arranged in the same order, DTAC < LA < SDS, and were systematically lower for variant B. The entropy change of the complexation process was always higher for isoform A, but these values were compensated by changes in enthalpy, resulting in almost identical ΔG for complexes of both isoforms. The determined crystal structures showed that substitution in positions 64 and 118 did not influence the overall structure of LGB complexes. The chemical character of the ligand polar group did not affect the position of its aliphatic chain in protein β-barrel, indicating a major role of hydrophobic interactions in ligand binding that prevailed even with the repulsion between positively charged DTAC and lysine residues located at binding site entrance.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23784992     DOI: 10.1002/jmr.2280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Recognit        ISSN: 0952-3499            Impact factor:   2.137


  6 in total

1.  New ligand-binding sites identified in the crystal structures of β-lactoglobulin complexes with desipramine.

Authors:  Joanna I Loch; Jakub Barciszewski; Joanna Śliwiak; Piotr Bonarek; Paulina Wróbel; Kinga Pokrywka; Ivan G Shabalin; Wladek Minor; Mariusz Jaskolski; Krzysztof Lewiński
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Allergens and their associated small molecule ligands-their dual role in sensitization.

Authors:  Maksymilian Chruszcz; Fook Tim Chew; Karin Hoffmann-Sommergruber; Barry K Hurlburt; Geoffrey A Mueller; Anna Pomés; Juha Rouvinen; Mayte Villalba; Birgitta M Wöhrl; Heimo Breiteneder
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 14.710

Review 3.  Bovine β-lactoglobulin/fatty acid complexes: binding, structural, and biological properties.

Authors:  Solène Le Maux; Saïd Bouhallab; Linda Giblin; André Brodkorb; Thomas Croguennec
Journal:  Dairy Sci Technol       Date:  2014-02-27

4.  In Silico Characterization of the Binding Modes of Surfactants with Bovine Serum Albumin.

Authors:  Osita Sunday Nnyigide; Sun-Gu Lee; Kyu Hyun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  β-Lactoglobulin and Glycodelin: Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Authors:  Lindsay Sawyer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Engineered β-Lactoglobulin Produced in E. coli: Purification, Biophysical and Structural Characterisation.

Authors:  Joanna I Loch; Piotr Bonarek; Magdalena Tworzydło; Agnieszka Polit; Barbara Hawro; Aneta Łach; Eryk Ludwin; Krzysztof Lewiński
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.695

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.