Literature DB >> 23784730

Impact of the center on graft failure after liver transplantation.

Sumeet K Asrani1, W Ray Kim, Erick B Edwards, Joseph J Larson, Gabriel Thabut, Walter K Kremers, Terry M Therneau, Julie Heimbach.   

Abstract

The hospital at which liver transplantation (LT) is performed has a substantial impact on post-LT outcomes. Center-specific outcome data are closely monitored not only by the centers themselves but also by patients and government regulatory agencies. However, the true magnitude of this center effect, apart from the effects of the region and donor service area (DSA) as well as recipient and donor determinants of graft survival, has not been examined. We analyzed data submitted to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for all adult (age ≥ 18 years) primary LT recipients (2005-2008). Using a mixed effects, proportional hazards regression analysis, we modeled graft failure within 1 year after LT on the basis of center (de-identified), region, DSA, and donor and recipient characteristics. At 115 unique centers, 14,654 recipients underwent transplantation. Rates of graft loss within a year varied from 5.9% for the lowest quartile of centers to 20.2% for the highest quartile. Gauged by a comparison of the 75th and 25th percentiles of the data, the magnitude of the center effect on graft survival (1.49-fold change) was similar to that of the recipient Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (1.47) and the donor risk index (DRI; 1.45). The center effect was similar across the DRI and MELD score quartiles and was not associated with a center's annual LT volume. After stratification by region and DSA, the magnitude of the center effect, though decreased, remained significant and substantial (1.30-fold interquartile difference). In conclusion, the LT center is a significant predictor of graft failure that is independent of region and DSA as well as donor and recipient characteristics.
© 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23784730      PMCID: PMC4130473          DOI: 10.1002/lt.23685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  25 in total

1.  Survival after adult liver transplantation does not correlate with transplant center case volume in the MELD era.

Authors:  P G Northup; T L Pruett; G J Stukenborg; C L Berg
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Relationship between provider volume and outcomes for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Ricardo Pietrobon; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Carlos E Marroquin; Bradley H Collins; Dev M Desai; Paul C Kuo; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Development and validation of a model predicting graft survival after liver transplantation.

Authors:  George N Ioannou
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 4.  The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD).

Authors:  Patrick S Kamath; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.

Authors:  S Feng; N P Goodrich; J L Bragg-Gresham; D M Dykstra; J D Punch; M A DebRoy; S M Greenstein; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Biliary complications following liver transplantation in the model for end-stage liver disease era: effect of donor, recipient, and technical factors.

Authors:  Theodore H Welling; David G Heidt; Michael J Englesbe; John C Magee; Randall S Sung; Darrell A Campbell; Jeffrey D Punch; Shawn J Pelletier
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Geographic disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation within a single UNOS region.

Authors:  Neal R Barshes; Natasha S Becker; W Kenneth Washburn; Glenn A Halff; Thomas A Aloia; John A Goss
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Differences in access to liver transplantation: disease severity, waiting time, and transplantation center volume.

Authors:  Jawad Ahmad; Cindy L Bryce; Thomas Cacciarelli; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Impact of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation policy on the use of high-risk organs for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Michael L Volk; Anna S F Lok; Shawn J Pelletier; Peter A Ubel; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effect of adjuvant use of metformin on periodontal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Cardoso Nicolini; Thaise Americo Grisa; Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz; Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing; Juliano Cavagni
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Early post-transplant survival: Interaction of MELD score and hospitalization status.

Authors:  Therese Bittermann; George Makar; David S Goldberg
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Survival outcomes in liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 40 or higher: a decade-long experience.

Authors:  Hina J Panchal; Joel B Durinka; Jeromy Patterson; Farah Karipineni; Sarah Ashburn; Eric Siskind; Jorge Ortiz
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Superior survival using living donors and donor-recipient matching using a novel living donor risk index.

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Benjamin French; Peter L Abt; Kim Olthoff; Abraham Shaked
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Beyond the NIH Multicenter HIV Transplant Trial Experience: Outcomes of HIV+ Liver Transplant Recipients Compared to HCV+ or HIV+/HCV+ Coinfected Recipients in the United States.

Authors:  Deirdre Sawinski; David S Goldberg; Emily Blumberg; Peter L Abt; Roy D Bloom; Kimberly A Forde
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 6.  Model for end-stage liver disease score and MELD exceptions: 15 years later.

Authors:  Sumeet K Asrani; Patrick S Kamath
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 6.047

7.  Novel Composite Endpoint for Assessing Outcomes in Liver Transplantation: Arterial and Biliary Complication-Free Survival.

Authors:  Eric Savier; Yann De Rycke; Chetana Lim; Claire Goumard; Geraldine Rousseau; Fabiano Perdigao; Pierre Rufat; Chady Salloum; Laura Llado; Emilio Ramos; Josefina Lopez-Dominguez; Alba Cachero; Joan Fabregat; Daniel Azoulay; Olivier Scatton
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 6.112

8.  Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplant in Elderly Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Is There an Appropriate Upper Age Cutoff?

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Rodrigo M Vianna; Eric Fleming Martin; Paul Martin; Leopoldo Ramon Arosemena Benitez; Christopher Blackburn O'Brien; Kalyan R Bhamidimarri
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  The prediction accuracy of dynamic mixed-effects models in clustered data.

Authors:  Brian S Finkelman; Benjamin French; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.522

10.  Liver transplantation in Central Europe.

Authors:  Pavel Trunecka; Zsuzsanna Gerlei; Wojciech Lisik; Lubomir Skladany; Jiri Fronek; Stefan Hrusovsky; Piotr Małkowski
Journal:  Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.