Literature DB >> 27217671

Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Current Aspects.

John K Triantafillidis1, Constantine Vagianos2, George Malgarinos1.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy represents a very important diagnostic modality for screening for colorectal cancer, because it has the ability to both detect and effectively remove pro-malignant and malignant lesions. It is recommended by almost all international and national gastroenterology and cancer societies, as an initial screening modality or, following a positive fecal occult blood test, to be performed every 10 years in individuals of average risk starting from the age of 50. However, a significant problem is the so-called post-screening (interval) polyps and cancers found some years after the index colonoscopy. In order to reduce the rate of interval cancers it is extremely necessary to optimize the quality and effectiveness of colonoscopy. Bowel preparation is of paramount importance for both accurate diagnosis and subsequent treatment of lesions found on colonoscopy. The quality of bowel preparation could be significantly improved by splitting the dose regimens, a strategy that has been shown to be superior to single-dose regimen. A good endoscopic technique and optimal withdrawal time offering adequate time for inspection, would further optimize the rate of cecal intubation and the number of lesions detected. During the last years, sophisticated devices have been introduced that would further facilitate cecal intubation. The percentage of total colonoscopies is now super-passing the level of 95 % allowing the adenoma detection rate to be greater than the suggestive level of 25 % in men and 15 % in women. This review aims to provide the reader with the current knowledge concerning indications, usefulness, limitations and future perspectives of this probably most important screening technique for colorectal cancer available today.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal; Colorectal cancer; Polyps; Screening; flexible Sigmoidoscopy

Year:  2015        PMID: 27217671      PMCID: PMC4856683          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-015-0410-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  70 in total

Review 1.  Complications of colonoscopy.

Authors:  James Church
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.806

2.  Patient compliance and suboptimal bowel preparation with split-dose bowel regimen in average-risk screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Patricia Wren; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Grace H Elta; Stephanie Foster; Sheryl Korsnes; Brittany Graustein; Philip Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; F Delcò; J M Inadomi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Repeat colonoscopy every 10 years or single colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasm screening in average-risk Chinese: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Zhen-Hua Wang; Qin-Yan Gao; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2012

6.  Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening? A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Frank van Hees; J Dik F Habbema; Reinier G Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Eric E Elliott; Jennifer L Mickevicius; Brittany B Graustein; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Bowel preparation for colonoscopy with magnesium sulphate and low-volume polyethylene glycol.

Authors:  Bojan Tepeš; Dominika N Mlakar; Tanja Metličar
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 9.  Optimizing colonoscopy preparation: the role of dosage, timing and diet.

Authors:  Jevon Puckett; Mattias Soop
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 10.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  B Joseph Elmunzer; Rodney A Hayward; Philip S Schoenfeld; Sameer D Saini; Amar Deshpande; Akbar K Waljee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  9 in total

1.  Splenic rupture as a rare and unpredicted complication in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus after colonoscopy.

Authors:  Subhanudh Thavaraputta; Passisd Laoveeravat; Bhakhathorn Thavaraputta; Ariwan Rakvit
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-12

2.  A multiple-dimension model for microbiota of patients with colorectal cancer from normal participants and other intestinal disorders.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Gulei Jin; Zhengliang Zhang; Jun Zhang; Yan Sun; Xiaoxiao Xie; Tingting Ma; Yongze Zhu; Yaoqiang Du; Yaofang Niu; Xinwei Shi
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  BidSi6 and BidEL isoforms as a potential marker for predicting colorectal adenomatous polyps.

Authors:  Flora Forouzesh; Fatemeh Sadat Kia; Ehsan Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.622

4.  Downregulated Tim-3 expression is responsible for the incidence and development of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Yan Wang; Xue-Rong Liu; Shi-Ru Hong; Jian Yao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Colon biopsies: benefit or burden?

Authors:  Stefan Morarasu; Muthana Haroon; Bianca Codrina Morarasu; Kirshan Lal; Emmanuel Eguare
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

6.  Prognosis of synchronous colorectal carcinoma compared to solitary colorectal carcinoma: a matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Wanbin He; Chengjun Zheng; Yonghong Wang; Jie Dan; Mingjie Zhu; Mingtian Wei; Jian Wang; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.566

7.  Barriers to colonoscopy in remote northern Canada: an analysis of cancellations.

Authors:  Heather Smith; Nicole Brunet; Alisha Tessier; Robin Boushey; Craig Kuziemsky
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 8.  Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: The Obstacles We Face in Determining a Non-Invasive Test and Current Advances in Biomarker Detection.

Authors:  Faddy Kamel; Khadiga Eltarhoni; Pasha Nisar; Mikhail Soloviev
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Noninvasive early detection of colorectal cancer by hypermethylation of the LINC00473 promoter in plasma cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Juan Ruiz-Bañobre; Aitor Rodriguez-Casanova; Nicolas Costa-Fraga; Aida Bao-Caamano; Ana Alvarez-Castro; Martín Carreras-Presas; Elena Brozos-Vazquez; Yolanda Vidal-Insua; Francisca Vazquez-Rivera; Sonia Candamio-Folgar; Manuel Mosquera-Presedo; Ramón M Lago-Lestón; Laura Muinelo-Romay; José Ángel Vázquez-Bueno; Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona; Víctor Moreno; Ajay Goel; Lourdes Castillo; Ana C Martin; Rocio Arroyo; Manel Esteller; Ana B Crujeiras; Rafael López-López; Angel Díaz-Lagares
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 7.259

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.