Literature DB >> 2378385

Microbial contamination of contact lens storage cases and solutions.

L A Wilson1, A D Sawant, R B Simmons, D G Ahearn.   

Abstract

We compared microbial contamination of contact lens storage cases of asymptomatic contact lens wearers (Group 1; No. = 118; sampled once) and of contact lens wearers with manufacturer's lens-care instructions reinforced (Group 2; No. = 62; sampled three, six, 12, and 20 weeks after initial advisement). A significantly higher incidence of contamination of contact lens storage cases and solutions was observed among samples from Group 1 (132 of 247 samples) as compared to samples from Group 2 (30 of 500 samples; P = .000). Contact lens storage cases of individuals in Group 2 who used hydrogen peroxide systems (four of 78) showed a significantly lower incidence of contamination as compared to individuals who used other chemical disinfection (11 of 62 soft lens users; 10 of 59 rigid gas-permeable lens users; P = .041). Biofilms, adhered microorganisms embedded in a glycocalyx, in contact lens storage cases were not always inactivated by the addition of fresh solutions. Cleaning and periodic replacement of contact lens storage cases is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2378385     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76991-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  18 in total

1.  Flow cytometry for determination of the efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Acanthamoeba spp.

Authors:  R N Borazjani; L L May; J A Noble; S V Avery; D G Ahearn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Efficacy of a contact lens cleaning device and its enhancement of the performance of contact lens care products.

Authors:  C P Ifejika; L McLaughlin-Borlace; V J Lucas; A D Roberts; J T Walker
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Microbial flora in eyes of current and former contact lens wearers.

Authors:  S M Fleiszig; N Efron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Acanthamoeba spp. and bacterial contamination in contact lens storage cases and the relationship to user profiles.

Authors:  Claiton José Pens; Marisa da Costa; Cristina Fadanelli; Karin Caumo; MariliseBrittes Rott
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Non-compliance with contact lens wear and care practices: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Danielle M Robertson; H Dwight Cavanagh
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Acanthamoeba, bacterial, and fungal contamination of contact lens storage cases.

Authors:  T B Gray; R T Cursons; J F Sherwan; P R Rose
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Microbial contamination of contact lens cases in the west of Scotland.

Authors:  P Devonshire; F A Munro; C Abernethy; B J Clark
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to hydrogel contact lens disinfection correlates with cytotoxic activity.

Authors:  C Lakkis; S M Fleiszig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Risk factors for acanthamoeba keratitis in contact lens users: a case-control study.

Authors:  C F Radford; A S Bacon; J K Dart; D C Minassian
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-17

10.  Epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis in contact lens wearers.

Authors:  F Stapleton; J K Dart; D V Seal; M Matheson
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.