Literature DB >> 21946785

Non-compliance with contact lens wear and care practices: a comparative analysis.

Danielle M Robertson1, H Dwight Cavanagh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of existing patient awareness of lens-related complications and underlying risk factors on actual patient behavior during contact lens wear and care practices in two different clinical study populations.
METHODS: Established contact lens wearers (n = 281) completed an anonymous written questionnaire on presenting to their habitual eye care practitioner in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. Data were analyzed and compared against a second study population, which comprised established contact lens wearers (n = 152) who were sequentially evaluated after their routine contact lens examination at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX (UTSW). All patients were questioned regarding his or her lens care practices and knowledge of complications and risk factors associated with contact lens wear.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of patients in the general community could identify by name a complication associated with lens wear compared with 91% within the medical center. The most frequent complications reported were related to comfort and handling (72%, Dallas-Fort Worth) and infection (47%, UTSW). The majority of patients could correctly identify risk factors associated with lens-related complications; awareness for topping-off solutions, tap water exposure, and hygiene varied between groups. Overall, 85% of patients perceived themselves as compliant with their lens wear and care practices. Using a standard scoring model to determine actual compliance, 2% of patients demonstrated good compliance; however, only 0.4% of patients were fully compliant with contact lens wear and care practices.
CONCLUSIONS: The data reveal some study bias in complication and risk awareness between populations; however, despite this limitation, a significant proportion of patients exhibited actual non-compliant behavior despite acknowledged awareness of risk. Although most patients consider themselves to be complying with standard practitioner guidelines for lens wear and care practices, essentially all contact lens wearing patients exhibit behavioral non-compliance with resulting increased risk for significant complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946785      PMCID: PMC3223553          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182333cf9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  42 in total

1.  Microbial contamination of contact lens storage cases and solutions.

Authors:  L A Wilson; A D Sawant; R B Simmons; D G Ahearn
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Contact lens user profile, attitudes and level of compliance to lens care.

Authors:  Yvonne Wu; Nicole Carnt; Fiona Stapleton
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. A case-control study. Microbial Keratitis Study Group.

Authors:  O D Schein; R J Glynn; E C Poggio; J M Seddon; K R Kenyon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-09-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Strategies to better engage, educate, and empower patient compliance and safe lens wear: compliance: what we know, what we do not know, and what we need to know.

Authors:  Peter C Donshik; William H Ehlers; Lynn D Anderson; Jeanine K Suchecki
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.018

5.  Acanthamoeba keratitis: a parasite on the rise.

Authors:  Nuthida Thebpatiphat; Kristin M Hammersmith; Fabiano N Rocha; Christopher J Rapuano; Brandon D Ayres; Peter R Laibson; Ralph C Eagle; Elisabeth J Cohen
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study.

Authors:  J K G Dart; C F Radford; D Minassian; S Verma; F Stapleton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions.

Authors:  Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Yoshifumi Imamura; Jyotsna Chandra; Changping Yu; Pranab K Mukherjee; Eric Pearlman; Mahmoud A Ghannoum
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses.

Authors:  E C Poggio; R J Glynn; O D Schein; J M Seddon; M J Shannon; V A Scardino; K R Kenyon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-09-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A study of patient compliance in a contact lens-wearing population.

Authors:  J L Sokol; M G Mier; S Bloom; P A Asbell
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1990 Jul-Sep

10.  Compliance with contact lens replacement in Canada and the United States.

Authors:  Kathryn Dumbleton; Doris Richter; Craig Woods; Lyndon Jones; Desmond Fonn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  12 in total

1.  A novel murine model for contact lens wear reveals clandestine IL-1R dependent corneal parainflammation and susceptibility to microbial keratitis upon inoculation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Matteo M E Metruccio; Stephanie J Wan; Hart Horneman; Abby R Kroken; Aaron B Sullivan; Tan N Truong; James J Mun; Connie K P Tam; Robin Frith; Laurence Welsh; Melanie D George; Carol A Morris; David J Evans; Suzanne M J Fleiszig
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  A study of contact lens compliance in a non-clinical setting.

Authors:  Erin M Rueff; Jessica Wolfe; Melissa D Bailey
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Identifying the content, functionalities, and features of a mobile application for contact lens wearers.

Authors:  Fatemeh Falahati-Marvast; Andrew D Pucker; Fateme Alipour; Jamileh Farokhzadian; Leila Ahmadian
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Component Analysis of Multipurpose Contact Lens Solutions To Enhance Activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Leo Lin; Janie Kim; Hope Chen; Regis Kowalski; Victor Nizet
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on contact lens wear in Spain.

Authors:  Diego García-Ayuso; Miguel Escámez-Torrecilla; Caridad Galindo-Romero; Francisco J Valiente-Soriano; Esmeralda Moya-Rodríguez; Paloma Sobrado-Calvo; Johnny Di Pierdomenico
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 6.  Contact lens care tips for patients: an optometrist's perspective.

Authors:  Christopher W Lievens; Kacey C Cilimberg; Alison Moore
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2017-08-11

7.  Knowledge, attitudes and practices of contact lens use in a South African adolescent population.

Authors:  Nduduzo Khoza; Therisha Moodley; Sinenhlanhla Sokhulu; Ntombethemba O Sotyana; Aneesa Suliman; Rekha Hansraj; Diane van Staden
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 0.927

8.  Wearing Pattern and Awareness About Contact Lens Wear in Secondary School Students in Kuala Lumpur.

Authors:  Bariah Mohd-Ali; NorAisyah Azmi
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-05-20

9.  Level of Compliance in Orthokeratology.

Authors:  Jiang Jun; Bian Zhiwen; Wang Feifu; Lian Lili; Lu Fan
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.018

10.  Patterns of Use and Knowledge about Contact Lens Wear amongst Teenagers in Rural Areas in Malaysia.

Authors:  Bariah Mohd-Ali; Xuan Li Tan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.