Literature DB >> 23783438

Preference for practice: a Danish study on young doctors' choice of general practice using a discrete choice experiment.

Line Bjørnskov Pedersen1, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the preferences of general practitioners (GPs) in training for organizational characteristics in general practice with focus on aspects that can mitigate problems with GP shortages. STUDY
DESIGN: A discrete choice experiment was used to investigate preferences for the attributes practice type, number of GPs in general practice, collaboration with other practices, change in weekly working hours (administrative versus patient related), and change in yearly surplus. DATA COLLECTION: In May 2011, all doctors actively engaged in the family medicine program in Denmark were invited to participate in a web-based survey. A total of 485 GPs in training responded to the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 56%. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A mixed logit model showed that GPs in training prefer to work in smaller shared practices (2 GPs). This stands in contrast to the preferences of current GPs. Hence, a generational change in the GP population is likely to introduce more productive practice forms, and problems with GP shortages are likely to be mitigated over the coming years. Results further showed that a majority of the respondents are willing to work in larger shared practices (with 3-4 GPs) if they receive an increase in surplus (approximately 50,000 DKK/6,719 EUR per year) and that they may be willing to take in more patient-related work if the increase in surplus is sufficient (approximately 200,000 DKK/26,875 EUR per year for 5 extra hours per week). Monetary incentives may therefore be an effective tool for further improving productivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23783438     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0500-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  13 in total

1.  Eliciting GPs' preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics.

Authors:  A Scott
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Preferences for general practice jobs: a survey of principals and sessional GPs.

Authors:  Sarah Wordsworth; Diane Skåtun; Anthony Scott; Fiona French
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Transforming general practice: the redistribution of medical work in primary care.

Authors:  Huw Charles-Jones; Joanna Latimer; Carl May
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2003-01

4.  Modelling heterogeneity in patients' preferences for the attributes of a general practitioner appointment.

Authors:  Arne Risa Hole
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Do general practitioners know patients' preferences? An empirical study on the agency relationship at an aggregate level using a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Line Bjørnskov Pedersen; Trine Kjær; Jakob Kragstrup; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.725

6.  Changing remuneration systems: effects on activity in general practice.

Authors:  A Krasnik; P P Groenewegen; P A Pedersen; P von Scholten; G Mooney; A Gottschau; H A Flierman; M T Damsgaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-30

7.  The role of monetary and nonmonetary incentives on the choice of practice establishment: a stated preference study of young physicians in Germany.

Authors:  Oliver H Günther; Beate Kürstein; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  'Ending up a GP': a qualitative study of junior doctors' perceptions of general practice as a career.

Authors:  R Petchey; J Williams; M Baker
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  [Preferences for user fees in general practice and the establishment of general practitioners in rural areas].

Authors:  Line Bjørnskov Pedersen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2012-11-19

10.  GPs working in solo practice: obstacles and motivations for working in a group? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Feron; Françoise Cerexhe; Dominique Pestiaux; Michel Roland; Didier Giet; Christian Montrieux; Dominique Paulus
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  8 in total

1.  Finance, fibromyalgia, caring, & communication.

Authors:  Ahmed Rashid
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Gregory Merlo; Mieke van Driel; Lisa Hall
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2020-12-09

3.  What do Iranian physicians value most when choosing a specialty? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Yaser Sarikhani; Sulmaz Ghahramani; Sisira Edirippulige; Yoshikazu Fujisawa; Matthew Bambling; Peivand Bastani
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Does an activity based remuneration system attract young doctors to general practice?

Authors:  Birgit Abelsen; Jan Abel Olsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Preference for practice--recent evidence.

Authors:  Line Bjørnskov Pedersen; Jørgen Nexøe
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Willingness to commute among future physicians: a multicenter cross-sectional survey of German medical students.

Authors:  Johannes Quart; Tobias Deutsch; Solveig Carmienke; Susanne Döpfmer; Thomas Frese
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Job preferences of medical and nursing students seeking employment in rural China: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Meiling Bao; Cunrui Huang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.