BACKGROUND: Studies of the effects of prenatal nutrition on neurodevelopment in humans are complicated because poor nutrition occurs in the context of psychosocial stressors and other risk factors associated with poor developmental outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Under controlled experimental conditions, we tested an effect of prenatal nutrition on neurodevelopmental outcomes in the nonhuman primate. DESIGN: Juvenile offspring of 19 female baboons, whose diets were either restricted [maternal nutrition restriction (MNR)] or who were fed ad libitum (control), were administered the progressive ratio task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Activity, persistence, attention, and emotional arousal were coded from videotapes. These established, reliable methods were consistent with those used to assess individual differences in the behaviors of school-age children. RESULTS: MNR offspring (3 female and 4 male offspring) had significantly fewer responses and received fewer reinforcements on the progressive ratio task than did control offspring (8 female and 4 male offspring). MNR offspring showed a more variable activity level and less emotional arousal than did control offspring. Female MNR offspring showed more variable and lower levels of persistence and attention than did female control offspring. Thus, under controlled experimental conditions, data support a main effect of prenatal nutrition on highly translatable neurodevelopmental outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional interventions during pregnancy have been successfully used to target neurodevelopmental problems, such as increasing folic acid intake during pregnancy to decrease the incidence of neural tube defects. Results from the current study can be used to support the testing of nutritional preventive interventions for the most-common childhood behavior problems.
BACKGROUND: Studies of the effects of prenatal nutrition on neurodevelopment in humans are complicated because poor nutrition occurs in the context of psychosocial stressors and other risk factors associated with poor developmental outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Under controlled experimental conditions, we tested an effect of prenatal nutrition on neurodevelopmental outcomes in the nonhuman primate. DESIGN: Juvenile offspring of 19 female baboons, whose diets were either restricted [maternal nutrition restriction (MNR)] or who were fed ad libitum (control), were administered the progressive ratio task from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Activity, persistence, attention, and emotional arousal were coded from videotapes. These established, reliable methods were consistent with those used to assess individual differences in the behaviors of school-age children. RESULTS: MNR offspring (3 female and 4 male offspring) had significantly fewer responses and received fewer reinforcements on the progressive ratio task than did control offspring (8 female and 4 male offspring). MNR offspring showed a more variable activity level and less emotional arousal than did control offspring. Female MNR offspring showed more variable and lower levels of persistence and attention than did female control offspring. Thus, under controlled experimental conditions, data support a main effect of prenatal nutrition on highly translatable neurodevelopmental outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional interventions during pregnancy have been successfully used to target neurodevelopmental problems, such as increasing folic acid intake during pregnancy to decrease the incidence of neural tube defects. Results from the current study can be used to support the testing of nutritional preventive interventions for the most-common childhood behavior problems.
Authors: Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Brooke S G Molina; William E Pelham; Brooks Applegate; Allison Dahlke; Meghan Overmyer; Benjamin B Lahey Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-10
Authors: Jesse S Rodriguez; Thad Q Bartlett; Kathryn E Keenan; Peter W Nathanielsz; Mark J Nijland Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2012-02-16 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Simona Spinelli; Luis Pennanen; Andrea C Dettling; Joram Feldon; Guy A Higgins; Christopher R Pryce Journal: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res Date: 2004-04
Authors: Hillary F Huber; McKenna M Considine; Susan Jenkins; Cun Li; Peter W Nathanielsz Journal: J Med Primatol Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 0.667
Authors: Anderson H Kuo; Cun Li; Jinqi Li; Hillary F Huber; Peter W Nathanielsz; Geoffrey D Clarke Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-12-17 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Katja Franke; Bea R H Van den Bergh; Susanne R de Rooij; Nasim Kroegel; Peter W Nathanielsz; Florian Rakers; Tessa J Roseboom; Otto W Witte; Matthias Schwab Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Susana P Pereira; Paulo J Oliveira; Ludgero C Tavares; António J Moreno; Laura A Cox; Peter W Nathanielsz; Mark J Nijland Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2015-03-11
Authors: Kimberley A Phillips; Karen L Bales; John P Capitanio; Alan Conley; Paul W Czoty; Bert A 't Hart; William D Hopkins; Shiu-Lok Hu; Lisa A Miller; Michael A Nader; Peter W Nathanielsz; Jeffrey Rogers; Carol A Shively; Mary Lou Voytko Journal: Am J Primatol Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 2.371