| Literature DB >> 23782552 |
Ester Hernández1, Rafael Bargiela, María Suárez Diez, Anette Friedrichs, Ana Elena Pérez-Cobas, María José Gosalbes, Henrik Knecht, Mónica Martínez-Martínez, Jana Seifert, Martin von Bergen, Alejandro Artacho, Alicia Ruiz, Cristina Campoy, Amparo Latorre, Stephan J Ott, Andrés Moya, Antonio Suárez, Vitor A P Martins dos Santos, Manuel Ferrer.
Abstract
The microbiomes in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of individuals receiving antibiotics and those in obese subjects undergo compositional shifts, the metabolic effects and linkages of which are not clearly understood. Herein, we set to gain insight into these effects, particularly with regard to carbohydrate metabolism, and to contribute to unravel the underlying mechanisms and consequences for health conditions. We measured the activity level of GIT carbohydrate-active enzymes toward 23 distinct sugars in adults patients (n = 2) receiving 14-d β-lactam therapy and in obese (n = 7) and lean (n = 5) adolescents. We observed that both 14 d antibiotic-treated and obese subjects showed higher and less balanced sugar anabolic capacities, with 40% carbohydrates being preferentially processed as compared with non-treated and lean patients. Metaproteome-wide metabolic reconstructions confirmed that the impaired utilization of sugars propagated throughout the pentose phosphate metabolism, which had adverse consequences for the metabolic status of the GIT microbiota. The results point to an age-independent positive association between GIT glycosidase activity and the body mass index, fasting blood glucose and insulin resistance (r ( 2) ≥ 0.95). Moreover, antibiotics altered the active fraction of enzymes controlling the thickness, composition and consistency of the mucin glycans. Our data and analyses provide biochemical insights into the effects of antibiotic usage on the dynamics of the GIT microbiota and pin-point presumptive links to obesity. The knowledge and the hypotheses generated herein lay a foundation for subsequent, systematic research that will be paramount for the design of "smart" dietary and therapeutic interventions to modulate host-microbe metabolic co-regulation in intestinal homeostasis.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic therapy; distal gut; glycosidase; metabolic reconstruction; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23782552 PMCID: PMC3744515 DOI: 10.4161/gmic.25321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut Microbes ISSN: 1949-0976

Figure 1. Shifts in carbohydrate turnover profile. Enzyme activities (units/g total protein) from the total faecal microbiota against 23 different sugar substrates were quantified by measuring the release of pNP in triplicates, as described in Materials and Methods section. (A) Glycosidase profile for both β-lactam-treated adult patients P1 and P2 in the time span investigated. (B) Glycosidase profile for lean (n = 5) and obese (n = 7) adolescents. A single plot (with mean values ± SD, estimated for each group of samples using three independent measurements each) is shown for P1/P2 (panel A) and lean and obese subjects (panel B), as no statistically significant differences in activity values were discernible within each set of samples. The insets in panels (A) and (B) represent the cumulative activity (total units/g ± SD) for all sugars being hydrolyzed for each of the samples. Note: α- and β-galactosidase activities were separated, as the activity levels were significantly higher as compared with the other activities and are shown in the left panels..

Figure 2. Correspondence analysis of the carbohydrate turnover profile. The relative proportion of glycosidase activity (units/g total protein) for each of 23 different sugars in the different samples was considered for the analysis. Five distinct clusters (color-coded in the figure), which are based on shifts in the turnover profiles toward the different sugars, are evident. Cluster one included α-glucose (S1), α-D-maltopentose (S4), α-xylose (S9) and β-arabinopyranose (S12). Cluster two included β-D-cellobiose (S6), α-L-galactose (S7), β-D-galactose (S8) and α-arabinofuranose (S13). Cluster three included β-D-glucose (S2), α-maltose (S3), β-D-mannose (S16), β-lactose (S17) and β-fucose (S19). Cluster four included β-xylose (S10), α-L-rhamnose (S14), α-fucose (S18), β-glucuronide (S20) and β-acetylglucuronide (S21). Cluster five included α-D-maltohexose (S5), α-mannose (S15), α-acetylneuraminic acid (S22) and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide (S23). The mean values for each group of samples were calculated accordingly to data provided in Figure 1.

Figure 3. Correlation between metabolic GIT activity and anthropometric and biochemical parameters. (A) Association between the BMI and total glycosidase activity. Note: no correlation was found for P1 (for additional comments see Discussion), and its data are not considered for the regression. (B) Association between the fasting blood glucose level and total glycosidase activity in obese subjects; inset in (B) represents the association between HOMA-IR index (calculated by an automatic web calculator; http://www.hcvsociety.org/files/HOMACalc.htm) and total glycosidase activity. The mean values for each group of samples were calculated using three independent measurements and according to the method and data described in Figure 1.

Figure 4. Relative abundance and expression levels of GH-like enzymes (referred as CAZymes, Carbohydrate Active Enzymes) and other enzymes (proteins with EC numbers) compared with the total amount of protein recovered from each of the shotgun metaproteomes of the GIT microbiota of patient P1. The results are the average of the shotgun metaproteome measurements from two independent technical replicates per sample.