Literature DB >> 23781887

The 'unskilled and unaware' effect is linear in a real-world setting.

Marina Sawdon1, Gabrielle Finn.   

Abstract

Self-assessment ability in medical students and practising physicians is generally poor, yet essential for academic progress and professional development. The aim of this study was to determine undergraduate medical students' ability to self-assess their exam performance accurately in a real-world, high-stakes exam setting, something not previously investigated. Year 1 and Year 2 medical students (n = 74) participated in a self-assessment exercise. Students predicted their exam grade (%) on the anatomy practical exam. This exercise was completed online immediately after the exam. Students' predicted exam grades were correlated with their actual attained exam grades using a Pearson's correlation. Demographic data were analysed using an independent t-test. A negative correlation was found between students' overall predicted and attained exam grades (P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between the students' predicted grades and actual grades in the bottom, 3rd and top (P < 0.0001), but not 2nd quartiles of participants. There was no relationship between the students' entry status into medical school and self-assessment ability (Year 1: P = 0.112; Year 2: P = 0.236) or between males and females (Year 1: P = 0.174). However, a relationship was determined for these variables in Year 2 (P = 0.022). The number of hours of additional self-directed learning undertaken did not influence students' self-assessment in both years. Our results demonstrate the 'unskilled and unaware' phenomenon in a real-world, high-stakes and practice-related setting. Students in all quartiles were unable to self-assess their exam performance, except for a group of mid-range students in the 2nd quartile. Poor performers were shown to overestimate their ability and, conversely, high achievers to underestimate their performance. We present evidence of a strong, significant linear relationship between medical students' ability to self-assess their performance in an anatomy practical exam, and their actual performance; in a real world setting. Despite the limited ability to self-assess reported in the literature, our results may inform approaches to revalidation, which currently frequently rely on an ability to self-assess.
© 2013 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; assessment; education; medical education; medicine; quantitative; self-assessment; students

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23781887      PMCID: PMC3931539          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  14 in total

1.  Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than-average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance.

Authors:  Joachim Krueger; Ross A Mueller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-02

Review 2.  Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda.

Authors:  Kevin W Eva; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Not knowing that they do not know: self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students.

Authors:  Vicki Langendyk
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Reliability of peer and self-assessment scores compared with trainers' scores following third molar surgery.

Authors:  Ann W Evans; Rachel M A Leeson; Aviva Petrie
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Why the Unskilled Are Unaware: Further Explorations of (Absent) Self-Insight Among the Incompetent.

Authors:  Joyce Ehrlinger; Kerri Johnson; Matthew Banner; David Dunning; Justin Kruger
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2008-01-01

6.  The conscientiousness index: a novel tool to explore students' professionalism.

Authors:  John C McLachlan; Gabrielle Finn; Jane Macnaughton
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Peer estimation of lack of professionalism correlates with low Conscientiousness Index scores.

Authors:  Gabrielle Finn; Marina Sawdon; Laura Clipsham; John McLachlan
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  The impact of color and role on retention of knowledge: a body-painting study within undergraduate medicine.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Finn; Pamela M White; Israa Abdelbagi
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.

Authors:  J Kruger; D Dunning
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-12

Review 10.  Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review.

Authors:  David A Davis; Paul E Mazmanian; Michael Fordis; R Van Harrison; Kevin E Thorpe; Laure Perrier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Context of "Confidence": Analyzing the Term Confidence in Resident Evaluations.

Authors:  Janae K Heath; Meagan E Alvarado; Caitlin B Clancy; Todd D Barton; Jennifer R Kogan; C Jessica Dine
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  Understanding Learners' Metacognition of Online Teacher Feedback Amid COVID-19: A Case Study in a University Livestream Instruction Context.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Fanding Meng; Shichuan Liu; Shiqi Wang; Lihui Pan; Zhong Lin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Knowledge and attitudes of U.S. medical students regarding the care of Asian American patients: a cross-sectional survey study.

Authors:  Sharon Pang; Hursuong Vongsachang; Thomas K Le; George Q Zhang; Taibo Li; Jason T C Lee; Shari M Lawson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Weakest students benefit most from a customized educational experience for Generation Y students.

Authors:  Romesh P Nalliah; Veerasathpurush Allareddy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.