Literature DB >> 23781517

Open-access colonoscopy on Ontario: associated factors and quality.

Shane Hadlock1, Linda Rabeneck, Lawrence F Paszat, Rinku Sutradhar, Andrew S Wilton, Jill Tinmouth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open-access (OA) colonoscopy may increase efficiency and decrease wait times; however, because the patient is seen for the first time at the endoscopy appointment, previous processes, such as information about the procedure, preparation and appropriate triage, may be suboptimal.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with OA colonoscopy and to determine the relationship between OA colonoscopy and an important quality measure, incomplete colonoscopy.
METHODS: A population-based analysis of all adult outpatients undergoing a first-time colonoscopy between 1997 and 2007 in Ontario was performed. Colonoscopy was considered to be OA if there were no visits in the preceding five years with the physician performing the colonoscopy. Using logistic regression, patient, physician and institution factors associated with OA colonoscopy were identified. Using propensity score matching, the relationship between OA colonoscopy and incomplete colonoscopy in 2006 was examined.
RESULTS: A total of 1,079,259 colonoscopies were performed. Of these, 14% were OA in 1997 compared with 26% in 2007. Patients 50 to 69 years of age, those from higher-income neighbourhoods and those with less comorbidity were more likely to undergo OA colonoscopy. The odds of receiving OA colonoscopy were six times greater in a nonhospital clinic compared with a community hospital. Colonoscopy was more likely to be complete if the procedure was OA (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.2 to 1.4]; P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of OA colonoscopy have increased substantially since 1997. Institution type was most strongly associated with OA colonoscopy. Colonoscopy completeness, a recognized quality indicator, does not appear to be compromised by OA colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23781517      PMCID: PMC3684369          DOI: 10.1155/2013/295412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  20 in total

1.  The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system.

Authors:  G Minoli; G Meucci; A Bortoli; A Garripoli; R Gullotta; P Leo; A Pera; A Prada; F Rocca; A Zambelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Assessing population health care need using a claims-based ACG morbidity measure: a validation analysis in the Province of Manitoba.

Authors:  Robert J Reid; Noralou P Roos; Leonard MacWilliam; Norman Frohlich; Charlyn Black
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Open access endoscopy.

Authors:  Glenn M Eisen; Todd H Baron; Jason A Dominitz; Douglas O Faigel; Jay L Goldstein; John F Johanson; J Shawn Mallery; Hareth M Raddawi; John J Vargo; J Patrick Waring; Robert D Fanelli; Jo Wheeler-Harbaugh
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Open access endoscopy--a nationwide survey of current practice.

Authors:  M G Bramble
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of diagnoses for research and management.

Authors:  B Starfield; J Weiner; L Mumford; D Steinwachs
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Appropriateness of referrals for open-access endoscopy. How do physicians in different medical specialties do?

Authors:  R J Mahajan; J S Barthel; J B Marshall
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-10-14

7.  Open access gastroscopy: second survey of current practice in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  J G Silcock; M G Bramble
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Association of socioeconomic status and receipt of colorectal cancer investigations: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sheldon M Singh; Lawrence F Paszat; Cindy Li; Jingsong He; Chris Vinden; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix.

Authors:  J P Weiner; B H Starfield; D M Steinwachs; L M Mumford
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  A population-based analysis of outpatient colonoscopy in adults assisted by an anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Othman Alharbi; Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Rinku Sutradhar; Lingsong Yun; Christopher M Vinden; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  6 in total

1.  Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality.

Authors:  Nikhil Kapila; Harjinder Singh; Kiranmayee Kandragunta; Fernando J Castro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Repeat colonoscopy after a colonoscopy with a negative result in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lieke Hol; Rinku Sutradhar; Sumei Gu; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

3.  Repeat Colonoscopy within 6 Months after Initial Outpatient Colonoscopy in Ontario: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Lawrence Paszat; Rinku Sutradhar; Nancy N Baxter; Jill Tinmouth; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-07

4.  Independent Heath Facility Meets Cancer Care Ontario and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Endoscopic Procedure Wait Times While Meeting Quality Indicators: A Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Fraser Kegel; Niv Sne; Timothy Rice; Eric Joy; Shayan Shahsavar; Celeste A Collins; Maria Gagarine; Alexandra Allard-Coutu; Lisa Klotz; Angela Coates; Kamyar Kahnamoui; Marko Simunovic
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-06-03

5.  The Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting in Usual Practice: Are Endoscopists Reporting Key Data Elements?

Authors:  S D Hadlock; N Liu; M Bernstein; M Gould; L Rabeneck; A Ruco; R Sutradhar; J M Tinmouth
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-07

6.  Perspectives of primary care providers and endoscopists about current practices, facilitators and barriers for preparation and follow-up of colonoscopy procedures: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Gayle Restall; John R Walker; Celeste Waldman; Kathleen Zawaly; Valerie Michaud; Dana Moffat; Harminder Singh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.