Literature DB >> 10882960

The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system.

G Minoli1, G Meucci, A Bortoli, A Garripoli, R Gullotta, P Leo, A Pera, A Prada, F Rocca, A Zambelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of indications is essential to the rational utilization of resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system and to assess whether the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines are useful in clinical practice.
METHODS: The indication for colonoscopy was assessed on 3000 consecutive examinations performed at 7 institutions.
RESULTS: The rate of colonoscopies "generally not indicated" according to the ASGE guidelines was 24.5% for outpatients and 15.5% for inpatients; the rates of examinations performed for an indication not listed in the ASGE guidelines were 12% and 20.1%, respectively. Generally not indicated colonoscopies were significantly less frequent for procedures requested by gastroenterologists or family physicians than those requested by other specialists, but were similar. Most generally not indicated examinations requested by gastroenterologists were for routine follow-up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease; when these patients were excluded, the rate of generally not indicated endoscopies requested by gastroenterologists was also lower than the corresponding rate for examinations requested by family physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, the rate of colonoscopies performed for generally not indicated reasons is high, particularly among examinations not requested by a gastroenterologist. Many colonoscopies are performed for indications not listed in the ASGE guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10882960     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.106683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  15 in total

1.  Appropriateness of indication and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: first report based on the 2000 guidelines of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Iqbal Siddique; Krishna Mohan; Fuad Hasan; Anjum Memon; Istvan Patty; Basil Al-Nakib
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The inpatient colonoscopy: a worthwhile endeavour.

Authors:  Darin Krygier; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Our results of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: evaluation of 700 patients.

Authors:  Mustafa Özsoy; Bahadır Celep; Ogun Ersen; Taner Özkececi; Ahmet Bal; Sezgin Yılmaz; Yüksel Arıkan
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-06-01

4.  Appropriateness of outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy in a non-academic hospital.

Authors:  João Mangualde; Marie I Cremers; Ana M Vieira; Ricardo Freire; Elia Gamito; Cristina Lobato; Ana L Alves; Fátima Augusto; Ana P Oliveira
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-10-16

Review 5.  Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno-García; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

6.  The Drivers of Discretionary Utilization: Clinical History Versus Physician Supply.

Authors:  Gregory W Ruhnke; Willard G Manning; David T Rubin; David O Meltzer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  The impact of chronic opioid use on colonoscopy outcomes.

Authors:  Salman Nusrat; Sultan Mahmood; Hussein Bitar; William M Tierney; Klaus Bielefeldt; Mohammad F Madhoun
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Factors contributing to patient nonattendance at open-access endoscopy.

Authors:  Suryakanth R Gurudu; Lucía C Fry; David E Fleischer; Bradford H Jones; Marlene R Trunkenbolz; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality.

Authors:  Nikhil Kapila; Harjinder Singh; Kiranmayee Kandragunta; Fernando J Castro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Endoscopy for hematochezia in patients under 50 years of age.

Authors:  J D Lewis; C E Shih; D Blecker
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.