Literature DB >> 2378066

Two mechanisms for localization? Evidence for separation-dependent and separation-independent processing of position information.

C A Burbeck1, Y L Yap.   

Abstract

The Weber function for separation--i.e. delta s as a function of separation s--is typically measured using a pair of targets presented roughly symmetrically relative to the fovea. With this paradigm, as the separation increases, the eccentricity of the individual targets increases also. To disentangle the effects of separation and eccentricity on the Weber function for separation, we systematically examined each of these variables and also examined the effects of target size and exposure duration. Separation discrimination thresholds were measured for average separations from 3 to 6 deg across a wide range of eccentricities, and for eccentricities of 2.5-10 deg for a range of separations. The dependence of threshold on target size was measured by varying the length of the stimuli from 1 to 120 min arc; the dependence on exposure duration was measured using durations of 100 and 500 msec at 10 deg eccentricity for comparison with data collected previously at smaller eccentricities. We found that for separations less than the eccentricity of the targets, thresholds depend primarily on separation; for larger separations, thresholds depend solely on eccentricity. In general, unless the targets are very small or quite brief, the spatial and temporal characteristics of the targets are not major contributors to the slope of the Weber function. Two mechanisms are proposed to account for thresholds in the two regions, one separation-dependent and one separation-independent.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2378066     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90099-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Flexible, task-dependent use of sensory feedback to control hand movements.

Authors:  David C Knill; Amulya Bondada; Manu Chhabra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Stochastic optimal control and estimation methods adapted to the noise characteristics of the sensorimotor system.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view.

Authors:  H Strasburger; L O Harvey; I Rentschler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-06

5.  Binocular and monocular depth cues in online feedback control of 3D pointing movement.

Authors:  Bo Hu; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visually guided navigation: head-mounted eye-tracking of natural locomotion in children and adults.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Adaptive allocation of vision under competing task demands.

Authors:  Chris R Sims; Robert A Jacobs; David C Knill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Gambling in the visual periphery: a conjoint-measurement analysis of human ability to judge visual uncertainty.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Camille Morvan; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Humans use visual and remembered information about object location to plan pointing movements.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements.

Authors:  Erik J Schlicht; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.