Literature DB >> 23778766

Scoliometer measurements of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Daniel M Coelho1, Guilherme H Bonagamba, Anamaria S Oliveira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic scoliosis are exposed to approximately 25 radiographic examinations of their spine throughout the clinical follow-up using the Cobb angle. Several non-invasive and radiation-free methods have been proposed to measure scoliotic deformities, including the scoliometer.
OBJECTIVES: To measure the intra- and interrater reliability of the scoliometer measurements, to assess the correlation of the values obtained by the scoliometer measurements with the Cobb angles obtained by radiography, and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the scoliometer measurements for the different diagnostic criteria for the referral of idiopathic scoliosis.
METHOD: Sixty-four patients were selected for the study: half with idiopathic scoliosis and half without. The 17 levels of the spine of each volunteer were measured with a scoliometer in the forward bending position. The measurements were performed three times on 42 volunteers by two different raters to obtain data for calculating the reliability values. Anteroposterior radiographs were taken to determine the Cobb angles, which were then compared with the highest trunk rotation value. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using radiograph criteria for referral: a Cobb angle of 10º and axial trunk rotation values between 5º and 10º.
RESULTS: Excellent intrarater reliability values and very good interrater reliability values were obtained. The correlation between the scoliometer measurements and radiograph analyses was considered good (r=0.7, p<0.05). The highest sensitivity value was for a trunk rotation of 5º at 87%.
CONCLUSIONS: The scoliometer measurements showed a good correlation with the radiographic measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23778766     DOI: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther        ISSN: 1413-3555            Impact factor:   3.377


  24 in total

1.  Predicting success or failure of brace treatment for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Eric Chalmers; Lindsey Westover; Johith Jacob; Andreas Donauer; Vicky H Zhao; Eric C Parent; Marc J Moreau; James K Mahood; Douglas M Hedden; Edmond H M Lou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Reliability and validity of inexpensive and easily administered anthropometric clinical evaluation methods of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashleigh Prowse; Rodney Pope; Paul Gerdhem; Allan Abbott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Tennis is not dangerous for the spine during growth: results of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Sabrina Donzelli; Monia Lusini; Claudia Fusco; Salvatore Minnella; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Development and clinical application of Vertebral Metrics: using a stereo vision system to assess the spine.

Authors:  Ana Teresa Gabriel; Cláudia Quaresma; Mário Forjaz Secca; Pedro Vieira
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Prevalence and determinants of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from school screening in Huangpu district, Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Miao Hu; Zheng Zhang; Xin Zhou; Rui Gao; Ce Wang; Jun Ma; Yichen Meng; Xuhui Zhou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 6.  2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Sabrina Donzelli; Angelo Gabriele Aulisa; Dariusz Czaprowski; Sanja Schreiber; Jean Claude de Mauroy; Helmut Diers; Theodoros B Grivas; Patrick Knott; Tomasz Kotwicki; Andrea Lebel; Cindy Marti; Toru Maruyama; Joe O'Brien; Nigel Price; Eric Parent; Manuel Rigo; Michele Romano; Luke Stikeleather; James Wynne; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-01-10

7.  Evaluation of angle trunk rotation measurements to improve quality and safety in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jill E Larson; Maximilian A Meyer; Barrett Boody; John F Sarwark
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

8.  The smartphone as a tool to screen for scoliosis, applicable by everyone.

Authors:  H M van West; J Herfkens; J P H J Rutges; M Reijman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Application of two-parameter scoliometer values for predicting scoliotic Cobb angle.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Ching-Lung Tai; Lih-Huei Chen; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Psychometric evaluation of spinal assessment methods to screen for scoliosis in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Måns Persson-Bunke; Tomasz Czuba; Gunnar Hägglund; Elisabet Rodby-Bousquet
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.