Literature DB >> 23778721

Lymph node ratio as a predictor of outcome in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Julian Künzel1, Georgios Psychogios, Konstantinos Mantsopoulos, Philipp Grundtner, Frank Waldfahrer, Heinrich Iro.   

Abstract

To evaluate the utility of lymph node ratio (LNR) as a potential prognostic predictor and to test whether LNR may be useful as a potential selection criterion for adjuvant treatment in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSSC). This retrospective study included 384 patients with regionally metastasized OPSCC who underwent primary surgery with or without adjuvant therapy from 1980 to 2010. LNR was calculated as the ratio of positive lymph nodes to the total number of lymph nodes removed during neck dissection. Statistical analysis using a Cox regression model was carried out. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 73%. An individual LNR peak at 0.1 was closest to the median of 0.0909, and both were set as cut-off values. Patients in the group greater than median had a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.472 for a DSS event; this was close to an HR of 2.513 for LNR >0.1. In multivariate analysis, LNR showed a markedly stronger HR with regard to survival in comparison with the grouped pN classification. The covariate treatment modality did not meet the assumption of the Cox regression, and it was therefore not possible to comment reasonably on the issue of whether LNR could be a potential selection criterion for adjuvant treatment. Lymph node ratio is in itself a valuable additional prognostic factor for risk stratification. According to the current results, the most valuable LNR for OPSSC is expected to be located in the range from 0.09 to 0.1. Further investigations in large prospective trials will be required to allow evidence-based recommendations for treatment decisions based on the LNR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23778721     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2513-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of the relevance of lymph node density in a contemporary series of patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Dan Leibovici; Mark F Munsell; Colin P Dinney; H Barton Grossman; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Changes in treatment of advanced oropharyngeal cancer, 1985-2001.

Authors:  Amy Y Chen; Nicole Schrag; Yongping Hao; Andrew Stewart; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Prognostic significance of nodal ratio in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Aviram Mizrachi; Tuvia Hadar; Naomi Rabinovics; Thomas Shpitzer; Dan Guttman; Raphael Feinmesser; Gideon Bachar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Speech and swallowing after surgical treatment of advanced oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Anne Marijn Kreeft; Lisette van der Molen; Frans J Hilgers; Alfons J Balm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Primary surgical treatment of T2 oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Georgios Psychogios; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Julian Kuenzel; Michael Koch; Johannes Zenk; Uli Harreus; Frank Waldfahrer; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  [Results of transoral laser resection in T1-2 oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal carcinomas].

Authors:  H Iro; K Mantsopoulos; J Zenk; F Waldfahrer; G Psychogios
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 1.057

7.  Lymph node prognostic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  G Mamelle; J Pampurik; B Luboinski; R Lancar; A Lusinchi; J Bosq
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Current trends in initial management of oropharyngeal cancer: the declining use of open surgery.

Authors:  Missak Haigentz; Carl E Silver; June Corry; Eric M Genden; Robert P Takes; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Risk factors for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases following radical cystectomy with en bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy: concept of lymph node density.

Authors:  John P Stein; Jie Cai; Susan Groshen; Donald G Skinner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Samuel A Dowthwaite; Jason H Franklin; David A Palma; Kevin Fung; John Yoo; Anthony C Nichols
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23
View more
  7 in total

1.  A critical evaluation of lymph node ratio in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  M de Ridder; C C M Marres; L E Smeele; M W M van den Brekel; M Hauptmann; A J M Balm; M L F van Velthuysen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in oropharyngeal carcinoma stratified for HPV-status.

Authors:  Christian Jacobi; Josepha Rauch; Jan Hagemann; Thomas Lautz; Maximilian Reiter; Philipp Baumeister
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  [Staging of oropharyngeal carcinomas : New TNM classification as a challenge for head and neck cancer centers].

Authors:  A Beltz; D Gösswein; S Zimmer; R H Stauber; J Hagemann; S Strieth; C Matthias; J Künzel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Caveolin 1 (Cav-1) and actin-related protein 2/3 complex, subunit 1B (ARPC1B) expressions as prognostic indicators for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Authors:  Lukman Bin Md Auzair; Vui King Vincent-Chong; Wan Maria Nabillah Ghani; Thomas George Kallarakkal; Anand Ramanathan; Chia Ee Lee; Zainal Ariff Abdul Rahman; Siti Mazlipah Ismail; Mannil Thomas Abraham; Rosnah Binti Zain
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Lymph node ratio is of limited value for the decision-making process in the treatment of patients with laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Julian Künzel; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Georgios Psychogios; Abbas Agaimy; Philipp Grundtner; Michael Koch; Heinrich Iro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Preoperative SCC Antigen, CRP Serum Levels, and Lymph Node Density in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mohamad Adel; Chung-Kan Tsao; Fu-Chan Wei; Huei-Tzu Chien; Chih-Hsiung Lai; Chun-Ta Liao; Hung-Ming Wang; Kang-Hsing Fan; Chung-Jan Kang; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Shiang-Fu Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Clinical and Prognostic Significance of the Eighth Edition Oral Cancer Staging System.

Authors:  Yasmin Ghantous; Aysar Nashef; David Sidransky; Murad Abdelraziq; Kutaiba Alkeesh; Shareef Araidy; Wayne Koch; Mariana Brait; Imad Abu El-Naaj
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.575

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.