Literature DB >> 23778366

Complications after surgery for lumbar stenosis in a veteran population.

Richard A Deyo1, David Hickam, Jonathan P Duckart, Mark Piedra.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the prospectively collected Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
OBJECTIVE: Determine rates of major medical complications, wound complications, and mortality among patients undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis and examine risk factors for these complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgery for spinal stenosis is concentrated among older adults, in whom complications are more frequent than among middle-aged patients. Many studies have focused on infections or device complications, but fewer studies have focused on major cardiopulmonary complications, using prospectively collected data.
METHODS: We identified patients who underwent surgery for a primary diagnosis of lumbar stenosis between 1998 and 2009 from the Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. We created a composite of major medical complications, including acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, systemic sepsis, coma, and cardiac arrest.
RESULTS: Among 12,154 eligible patients, major medical complications occurred in 2.1%, wound complications in 3.2%, and 90-day mortality in 0.6%. Major medical complications, but not wound complications, were strongly associated with age. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class was a strong predictor of complications. Insulin use, long-term corticosteroid use, and preoperative functional status were also significant predictors. Fusion procedures were associated with higher complication rates than with decompression alone. In logistic regressions, ASA class and age were the strongest predictors of major medical complications (odds ratio for ASA class 4 vs. class 1 or 2: 2.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-5.25; P = 0.0002). After adjustment for comorbidity, age, and functional status, fusion procedures remained associated with higher medical complication rates than were decompressions alone (odds ratio = 2.85; 95% confidence interval, 2.14-3.78; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: ASA class, age, type of surgery, insulin or corticosteroid use, and functional status were independent risk factors for major medical complications. These factors may help in selecting patients and planning procedures, improving patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23778366      PMCID: PMC3865062          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829f65c1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Matthew J Tormenti; Matthew B Maserati; Christopher M Bonfield; Peter C Gerszten; John J Moossy; Adam S Kanter; Richard M Spiro; David O Okonkwo
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-10-14

2.  Predisposing factors for infection in spine surgery: a survey of 850 spinal procedures.

Authors:  C Wimmer; H Gluch; M Franzreb; M Ogon
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1998-04

3.  Management of postoperative infections after spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  A D Levi; C A Dickman; V K Sonntag
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Treatment of postoperative wound infections following spinal fusion with instrumentation.

Authors:  D M Abbey; D M Turner; J S Warson; T C Wirt; R D Scalley
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1995-08

5.  Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Leah M Ochoa; Julia O Bader; Philip J Belmont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Risk factors for medical complication after lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 767 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Jacques Hacquebord; Anuj Varshney; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Mark A Konodi; Jens Chapman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Brook I Martin; William Kreuter; David C Goodman; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Jeffrey J Nepple; K Daniel Riew; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Jennie Mayfield; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  National complication rates and disposition after posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Paul S Kalanithi; Chirag G Patil; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Risk factors for postoperative spinal wound infections after spinal decompression and fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Anand Veeravagu; Chirag G Patil; Shivanand P Lad; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  12 in total

1.  Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.

Authors:  Christian Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas P Staub; Sarah J Lord; Harry R Merk; Thomas Barz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Predicting discharge placement after elective surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis using machine learning methods.

Authors:  Paul T Ogink; Aditya V Karhade; Quirina C B S Thio; William B Gormley; Fetullah C Oner; Jorrit J Verlaan; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Postoperative Functional Outcomes in Older Adults.

Authors:  Zabecca Brinson; Victoria L Tang; Emily Finlayson
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2016-05-04

4.  The effect of insulin dependent diabetes on bone metabolism and growth after spinal fusion.

Authors:  Zachary NaPier; Linda E A Kanim; Trevor J Nelson; Khosrowdad Salehi; Yasaman Arabi; Juliane D Glaeser; Dmitriy Sheyn; Melodie F Metzger
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Predictors of Complications and Unfavorable Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Treatment in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spine Pathologies (Case Series).

Authors:  Vladimir Klimov; Aleksey Evsyukov; Evgeniya Amelina; Sergey Ryabykh; Alexander Simonovich
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-26

6.  Risk factors for postoperative complication after spinal fusion and instrumentation in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Honghui Tang; Jianfei Zhu; Feng Ji; Shouguo Wang; Yue Xie; Haodong Fei
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Perioperative complications after surgical treatment in degenerative adult de novo scoliosis.

Authors:  Maciej J K Simon; Henry F H Halm; Markus Quante
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  ASA Classification as a Risk Stratification Tool in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Study of 5805 Patients.

Authors:  Sulaiman Somani; John Di Capua; Jun S Kim; Kevin Phan; Nathan J Lee; Parth Kothari; Joung-Heon Kim; James Dowdell; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-20

9.  Racial Disparities in Elderly Patients Receiving Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery.

Authors:  Doniel Drazin; Faris Shweikeh; Carlito Lagman; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-05-01

10.  Enhancing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with hydroxyapatite granules: A biomechanical study using an osteoporotic bone model.

Authors:  Haruo Kanno; Toshimi Aizawa; Ko Hashimoto; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.