Literature DB >> 19652635

National complication rates and disposition after posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis.

Paul S Kalanithi1, Chirag G Patil, Maxwell Boakye.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Database study using Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) administrative data from 1993 to 2002.
OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of in-hospital complications and complex disposition for patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis, and the association of demographic factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spondylolisthesis affects primarily elderly populations. Recent data suggests a benefit of surgical treatment for acquired lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, the risks of these procedures, and the impact of patient demographics on risk, have not been nationally quantified.
METHODS: Data from 66,601 patients in the NIS (1993-2002) with diagnostic and procedure codes specifying posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis were included. Patients were grouped by age, sex, race, number of comorbidities, hospital size, and time period of procedure. Multivariate analysis correlated patient and hospital characteristics with complex disposition and complications.
RESULTS: Mortality rate was 0.15%. Eleven percent of patients had one or more in-hospital complications; overall complication rate was 13 per 100 operations. Hematoma/seroma (5.4 per 100) was the most common complication, followed by pulmonary (2.6), renal (1.8), and cardiac (1.2) complications. Infection and neurologic injury occurred in <1% of patients. Older patients and those with a number of comorbidities had greater rates of in-hospital complication and complex disposition. Compared to those aged 45 to 64, patients aged 65 to 84 were almost 70% more likely to have complications (OR: 1.67) and 5 times as likely to have complex disposition (OR: 5.84). Having 3 or greater comorbidities, compared to no comorbidities, was also associated with increased risk of complication (OR: 1.6) and complex disposition (OR: 2.3).
CONCLUSION: Posterior lumbar fusion for acquired lumbar spondylolisthesis is safe. However, age and comorbidity independently increase in-hospital complications and complex disposition. These data may improve national estimates of surgical risk, patient selection, informed consent, and cost-efficacy analysis for posterior lumbar fusion operations for acquired spondylolisthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19652635     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ae2243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  48 in total

1.  Perioperative mortality after lumbar spinal fusion surgery: an analysis of epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  Matthias Pumberger; Ya Lin Chiu; Yan Ma; Federico P Girardi; Vassilios Vougioukas; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the Accuflex rod system as a stand-alone device: experience in 20 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez; Barón Zárate-Kalfópulos; Isabel Ramírez-Mora; Luis Miguel Rosales-Olivarez; Armando Alpizar-Aguirre; Guadalupe Sánchez-Bringas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of 5766 vertebral compression fractures treated with or without kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Jay M Zampini; Andrew P White; Kevin J McGuire
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Pamela J Wakefield; Glenn A Bub; James D Toombs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-18

5.  Risk factors for medical complication after cervical spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 582 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Mark A Konodi; Amy M Cizik; Mark A Weinreich; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens Chapman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qu Jin-Tao; Tang Yu; Wang Mei; Tang Xu-Dong; Zhang Tian-Jian; Shi Guo-Hua; Chen Lei; Hu Yue; Wang Zi-Tian; Zhou Yue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lung protective effects of budesonide nebulization during perioperative period of thoracolumbar fusion.

Authors:  Wenjing Li; Yu Zhao; Zhijian Sun; Xu Yang; Lijuan Zhao; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.

Authors:  Fan Ding; Zhiwei Jia; Zhigang Zhao; Lin Xie; Xinfeng Gao; Dezhang Ma; Ming Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Risk factors for medical complication after spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 1,591 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Lee; Mark A Konodi; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 10.  Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christina L Goldstein; Kevin Macwan; Kala Sundararajan; Y Raja Rampersaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.