Literature DB >> 23778014

A classification framework applied to cancer gene expression profiles.

Hussein Hijazi1, Christina Chan.   

Abstract

Classification of cancer based on gene expression has provided insight into possible treatment strategies. Thus, developing machine learning methods that can successfully distinguish among cancer subtypes or normal versus cancer samples is important. This work discusses supervised learning techniques that have been employed to classify cancers. Furthermore, a two-step feature selection method based on an attribute estimation method (e.g., ReliefF) and a genetic algorithm was employed to find a set of genes that can best differentiate between cancer subtypes or normal versus cancer samples. The application of different classification methods (e.g., decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine (SVM), bagging, and random forest) on 5 cancer datasets shows that no classification method universally outperforms all the others. However, k-nearest neighbor and linear SVM generally improve the classification performance over other classifiers. Finally, incorporating diverse types of genomic data (e.g., protein-protein interaction data and gene expression) increase the prediction accuracy as compared to using gene expression alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23778014      PMCID: PMC3873740          DOI: 10.1260/2040-2295.4.2.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Eng        ISSN: 2040-2295            Impact factor:   2.682


  35 in total

1.  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning.

Authors:  Margaret A Shipp; Ken N Ross; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew P Weng; Jeffery L Kutok; Ricardo C T Aguiar; Michelle Gaasenbeek; Michael Angelo; Michael Reich; Geraldine S Pinkus; Tane S Ray; Margaret A Koval; Kim W Last; Andrew Norton; T Andrew Lister; Jill Mesirov; Donna S Neuberg; Eric S Lander; Jon C Aster; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Integrated modeling of clinical and gene expression information for personalized prediction of disease outcomes.

Authors:  Jennifer Pittman; Erich Huang; Holly Dressman; Cheng-Fang Horng; Skye H Cheng; Mei-Hua Tsou; Chii-Ming Chen; Andrea Bild; Edwin S Iversen; Andrew T Huang; Joseph R Nevins; Mike West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attribute clustering for grouping, selection, and classification of gene expression data.

Authors:  Wai-Ho Au; Keith C C Chan; Andrew K C Wong; Yang Wang
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  The role of the LFA-1/ICAM-1 interaction in human leukocyte homing and adhesion.

Authors:  S O Wawryk; J R Novotny; I P Wicks; D Wilkinson; D Maher; E Salvaris; K Welch; J Fecondo; A W Boyd
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 12.988

5.  Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray.

Authors:  M Schena; D Shalon; R W Davis; P O Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Machine learning for survival analysis: a case study on recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  B Zupan; J Demsar; M W Kattan; J R Beck; I Bratko
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 7.  CLU and colon cancer. The dual face of CLU: from normal to malignant phenotype.

Authors:  P Mazzarelli; Sabina Pucci; L G Spagnoli
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.242

8.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh; Phillip G Febbo; Kenneth Ross; Donald G Jackson; Judith Manola; Christine Ladd; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico; Jerome P Richie; Eric S Lander; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; William R Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Identifying cancer biomarkers by network-constrained support vector machines.

Authors:  Li Chen; Jianhua Xuan; Rebecca B Riggins; Robert Clarke; Yue Wang
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-10-12

Review 10.  An assessment of recently published gene expression data analyses: reporting experimental design and statistical factors.

Authors:  Peyman Jafari; Francisco Azuaje
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  8 in total

1.  RNA-Seq-Based Breast Cancer Subtypes Classification Using Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Zhezhou Yu; Zhuo Wang; Xiangchun Yu; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-29

2.  Differential diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma using Logic Learning Machine.

Authors:  Stefano Parodi; Rosa Filiberti; Paola Marroni; Roberta Libener; Giovanni Paolo Ivaldi; Michele Mussap; Enrico Ferrari; Chiara Manneschi; Erika Montani; Marco Muselli
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Transferring genomics to the clinic: distinguishing Burkitt and diffuse large B cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Chulin Sha; Sharon Barrans; Matthew A Care; David Cunningham; Reuben M Tooze; Andrew Jack; David R Westhead
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 11.117

4.  Identification of Biomarkers for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis of Stomach Cancer Using Clinical DNA Methylation Data.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Yawen Xiao; Chao Xia; Fan Yang; Hua Li; Zhifeng Shao; Zongli Lin; Xiaodong Zhao
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.434

5.  Improving Drug Sensitivity Prediction Using Different Types of Data.

Authors:  H A Hejase; C Chan
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-18

6.  Obesity, diabetes and the risk of colorectal adenoma and cancer.

Authors:  Ghodratollah Soltani; Arash Poursheikhani; Maryam Yassi; Abdorasool Hayatbakhsh; Matin Kerachian; Mohammad Amin Kerachian
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.763

7.  Wnt/β-Catenin, Carbohydrate Metabolism, and PI3K-Akt Signaling Pathway-Related Genes as Potential Cancer Predictors.

Authors:  Pengliang Chen; Pengwei Shi; Gang Du; Zhen Zhang; Liang Liu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  An Amalgamated Approach to Bilevel Feature Selection Techniques Utilizing Soft Computing Methods for Classifying Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Prabhakar; Harikumar Rajaguru; Sun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.