Literature DB >> 11185421

Machine learning for survival analysis: a case study on recurrence of prostate cancer.

B Zupan1, J Demsar, M W Kattan, J R Beck, I Bratko.   

Abstract

Machine learning techniques have recently received considerable attention, especially when used for the construction of prediction models from data. Despite their potential advantages over standard statistical methods, like their ability to model non-linear relationships and construct symbolic and interpretable models, their applications to survival analysis are at best rare, primarily because of the difficulty to appropriately handle censored data. In this paper we propose a schema that enables the use of classification methods--including machine learning classifiers--for survival analysis. To appropriately consider the follow-up time and censoring, we propose a technique that, for the patients for which the event did not occur and have short follow-up times, estimates their probability of event and assigns them a distribution of outcome accordingly. Since most machine learning techniques do not deal with outcome distributions, the schema is implemented using weighted examples. To show the utility of the proposed technique, we investigate a particular problem of building prognostic models for prostate cancer recurrence, where the sole prediction of the probability of event (and not its probability dependency on time) is of interest. A case study on preoperative and postoperative prostate cancer recurrence prediction shows that by incorporating this weighting technique the machine learning tools stand beside modern statistical methods and may, by inducing symbolic recurrence models, provide further insight to relationships within the modeled data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11185421     DOI: 10.1016/s0933-3657(00)00053-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  18 in total

1.  A classification framework applied to cancer gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Hussein Hijazi; Christina Chan
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.682

2.  A Naive Bayes machine learning approach to risk prediction using censored, time-to-event data.

Authors:  Julian Wolfson; Sunayan Bandyopadhyay; Mohamed Elidrisi; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; David M Vock; Donald Musgrove; Gediminas Adomavicius; Paul E Johnson; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A Practical Guide to Integrating Multimodal Machine Learning and Metabolic Modeling.

Authors:  Supreeta Vijayakumar; Giuseppe Magazzù; Pradip Moon; Annalisa Occhipinti; Claudio Angione
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards.

Authors:  Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Christopher Winslow; David O Meltzer; Michael W Kattan; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Developing EHR-driven heart failure risk prediction models using CPXR(Log) with the probabilistic loss function.

Authors:  Vahid Taslimitehrani; Guozhu Dong; Naveen L Pereira; Maryam Panahiazar; Jyotishman Pathak
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 6.  Towards the Interpretability of Machine Learning Predictions for Medical Applications Targeting Personalised Therapies: A Cancer Case Survey.

Authors:  Antonio Jesús Banegas-Luna; Jorge Peña-García; Adrian Iftene; Fiorella Guadagni; Patrizia Ferroni; Noemi Scarpato; Fabio Massimo Zanzotto; Andrés Bueno-Crespo; Horacio Pérez-Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11

Review 8.  Machine learning applications to enhance patient specific care for urologic surgery.

Authors:  Patrick W Doyle; Nicholas L Kavoussi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  A gradient boosting algorithm for survival analysis via direct optimization of concordance index.

Authors:  Yifei Chen; Zhenyu Jia; Dan Mercola; Xiaohui Xie
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Accurate prediction of breast cancer survival through coherent voting networks with gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Marco Pellegrini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.