Literature DB >> 23777420

Understanding roles of porcine small intestinal submucosa in urinary bladder regeneration: identification of variable regenerative characteristics of small intestinal submucosa.

Hsueh-Kung Lin1, Shirley Yezdi Godiwalla, Blake Palmer, Dominic Frimberger, Qing Yang, Sundar V Madihally, Kar-Ming Fung, Bradley P Kropp.   

Abstract

Neuropathic bladders are the result from damages to the central or peripheral nervous system, and ultimately may require surgical reconstruction to increase bladder volumes and to reduce the risk of damages to the kidneys. Surgical reconstruction through bladder augmentation has traditionally been practiced using a segment of the ileum, colon, or stomach from the patient through enterocystoplasty. However, the use of gastrointestinal segments can lead to serious adverse consequences. Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS), a xenogeneic, acellular, biocompatable, biodegradable, and collagen-based bioscaffold is best known to encourage bladder regeneration without ex vivo cell seeding before implantation in various experimental and preclinical animal models. Although it has been demonstrated that SIS supports bladder cell growth in vitro, and SIS-regenerated bladders are histologically and functionally indistinguishable from normal functional tissues, clinical utilization of SIS for bladder augmentation has been hampered by inconsistent preclinical results. Several variables in SIS, such as the age of pigs, the region of the small intestine, and method of sterilization, can have different physical properties, biochemical characteristics, inflammatory cell infiltration, and regenerative capacity due to cellular responses in vitro and in vivo. These parameters are particularly important for bladder regeneration due to its specific biological function in urine storage. Clinical application of SIS for surgical bladder reconstruction may require graft materials to be prepared from a specific region of the small intestine, or to be further formulated or processed to provide uniform physical and biochemical properties for consistent, complete, and functional bladder regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23777420      PMCID: PMC3922139          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2013.0126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  74 in total

1.  In vitro biocompatibility assessment of naturally derived and synthetic biomaterials using normal human urothelial cells.

Authors:  J L Pariente; B S Kim; A Atala
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-04

2.  The ontogeny of canine small intestinal submucosa regenerated bladder.

Authors:  J C Pope; M M Davis; E R Smith; M J Walsh; P K Ellison; R C Rink; B P Kropp
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The effect of choice of sterilisation method on the biocompatibility and biodegradability of SIS (small intestinal submucosa).

Authors:  Marguerita Grimes; J T Pembroke; Tim McGloughlin
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.300

4.  Physical characteristics of small intestinal submucosa scaffolds are location-dependent.

Authors:  Devanathan Raghavan; Bradley P Kropp; H-K Lin; Yuanyuan Zhang; Richard Cowan; Sundararajan V Madihally
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Xenogeneic extracellular matrix grafts elicit a TH2-restricted immune response.

Authors:  A J Allman; T B McPherson; S F Badylak; L C Merrill; B Kallakury; C Sheehan; R H Raeder; D W Metzger
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Metabolic factors in the causation of urinary tract stones in patients with enterocystoplasties.

Authors:  W G Robertson; C R J Woodhouse
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-03-08

7.  The Th2-restricted immune response to xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa does not influence systemic protective immunity to viral and bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  Amy J Allman; Timothy B McPherson; Lisa C Merrill; Stephen F Badylak; Dennis W Metzger
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2002-02

8.  Extracellular matrix from porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) as immune adjuvants.

Authors:  Youssef Aachoui; Swapan K Ghosh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intestine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs.

Authors:  K M Clarke; G C Lantz; S K Salisbury; S F Badylak; M C Hiles; S L Voytik
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Bladder cell culture on small intestinal submucosa as bioscaffold: experimental study on engineered urothelial grafts.

Authors:  Fabio Campodonico; Roberto Benelli; Alberto Michelazzi; Emanuela Ognio; Carlo Toncini; Massimo Maffezzini
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Topical Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Chronic Wounds: Rationale and Clinical Application.

Authors:  Lisa J Gould
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  A Gingiva-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Laden Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Extracellular Matrix Construct Promotes Myomucosal Regeneration of the Tongue.

Authors:  Qilin Xu; Rabie M Shanti; Qunzhou Zhang; Steven B Cannady; Bert W O'Malley; Anh D Le
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Minimal modulation of the host immune response to SIS matrix implants by mesenchymal stem cells from the amniotic fluid.

Authors:  F Lesage; S Pranpanus; F M Bosisio; M Jacobs; S Ospitalieri; J Toelen; J Deprest
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Bladder biomechanics and the use of scaffolds for regenerative medicine in the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ajalloueian; Greg Lemon; Jöns Hilborn; Ioannis S Chronakis; Magdalena Fossum
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  The bioactivity of cartilage extracellular matrix in articular cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Amanda J Sutherland; Gabriel L Converse; Richard A Hopkins; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  In vivo regeneration of bladder muscular wall using decellularized colon matrix: an experimental study.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Reza Khorramirouz; Shabnam Sabetkish; Mahba Ataei Talebi; Aram Akbarzadeh; Sorena Keihani
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Co-administration of platelet-rich plasma and small intestinal submucosa is more beneficial than their individual use in promoting acute skin wound healing.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Lei; Liuhanghang Cheng; Yu Yang; Mengru Pang; Yunqing Dong; Xuanru Zhu; Caihong Chen; Zexin Yao; Gang Wu; Biao Cheng; Tymour Forouzanfar
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 8.  Regenerative Medicine: Charting a New Course in Wound Healing.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Gurtner; Mary Ann Chapman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Successful endothelialization and remodeling of a cell-free small-diameter arterial graft in a large animal model.

Authors:  Maxwell T Koobatian; Sindhu Row; Randall J Smith; Carmon Koenigsknecht; Stelios T Andreadis; Daniel D Swartz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Extracellular matrix-derived biomaterials in engineering cell function.

Authors:  Hao Xing; Hudson Lee; Lijing Luo; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 14.227

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.