Literature DB >> 23775946

Improved waiting-list outcomes in Argentina after the adoption of a model for end-stage liver disease-based liver allocation policy.

Nora Gabriela Cejas1, Federico G Villamil, Javier C Lendoire, Viviana Tagliafichi, Arturo Lopez, Daniela Hansen Krogh, Carlos A Soratti, Liliana Bisigniano.   

Abstract

In July 2005, Argentina became the first country after the United States to introduce the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) for organ allocation. In this study, we investigated waiting-list (WL) outcomes (n = 3272) and post-liver transplantation (LT) survival in 2 consecutive periods of 5 years before and after the implementation of a MELD-based allocation policy. Data were obtained from the database of the national institute for organ allocation in Argentina. After the adoption of the MELD system, there were significant reductions in WL mortality [28.5% versus 21.9%, P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37-1.81] and total dropout rates (38.6% versus 29.1%, P < 0.001, HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.16-1.48) despite significantly less LT accessibility (57.4% versus 50.7%, P < 0.001, HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.39-1.68). The annual number of deaths per 1000 patient-years at risk decreased from 273 in 2005 to 173 in 2010, and the number of LT procedures per 1000 patient-years at risk decreased from 564 to 422. MELD and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium scores were excellent predictors of 3-month WL mortality with c statistics of 0.828 and 0.857, respectively (P < 0.001). No difference was observed in 1-year posttransplant survival between the 2 periods (81.1% versus 81.3%). Although patients with a MELD score > 30 had lower posttransplant survival, the global accuracy of the score for predicting outcomes was poor, as indicated by a c statistic of only 0.523. Patients with granted MELD exceptions (158 for hepatocellular carcinoma and 52 for other reasons) had significantly higher access to LT (80.4%) in comparison with nonexception patients with equivalent listing priority (MELD score = 18-25; 54.6%, P < 0.001, HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.40-0.61). In conclusion, the adoption of the MELD model in Argentina has resulted in improved liver organ allocation without compromising posttransplant survival.
© 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23775946     DOI: 10.1002/lt.23665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  5 in total

1.  Hepatitis C virus infection in Argentina: Burden of chronic disease.

Authors:  Ezequiel Ridruejo; Fernando Bessone; Jorge R Daruich; Chris Estes; Adrián C Gadano; Homie Razavi; Federico G Villamil; Marcelo O Silva
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 2.  THE IMPACT OF THE MELD SCORE ON LIVER TRANSPLANT ALLOCATION AND RESULTS: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW.

Authors:  Ana Claudia Oliveira de Moraes; Priscilla Caroliny de Oliveira; Olival Cirilo Lucena da Fonseca-Neto
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  Hepatocellular carcinoma in Latin America: Diagnosis and treatment challenges.

Authors:  Federico Piñero; Jaime Poniachik; Ezequiel Ridruejo; Marcelo Silva
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Validation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease sodium (MELD-Na) score in the Eurotransplant region.

Authors:  Ben F J Goudsmit; Hein Putter; Maarten E Tushuizen; Jan de Boer; Serge Vogelaar; I P J Alwayn; Bart van Hoek; Andries E Braat
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Organ donor allocation system for liver transplantation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Call for major revision.

Authors:  Mohammed Al Sebayel; Hussien Elsiesy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.485

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.