| Literature DB >> 23774887 |
Li-Chung Hu1, Wei-Hsuan Yen, Jui-Hsin Su, Michael Yen-Nan Chiang, Zhi-Hong Wen, Wu-Fu Chen, Ting-Jang Lu, Yu-Wei Chang, Yung-Husan Chen, Wei-Hsien Wang, Yang-Chang Wu, Ping-Jyun Sung.
Abstract
A new norcembranoidal diterpene, 1-epi-sinulanorcembranolide A (1), and a new cembranoidal diterpene, flexibilin D (2), were isolated from the soft corals, Sinularia gaweli and Sinularia flexibilis, respectively. The structures of new metabolites 1 and 2 were elucidated by spectroscopic methods, and compound 2 was found to significantly inhibit the accumulation of the pro-inflammatory iNOS and COX-2 proteins of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophage cells. In addition, S. flexibilis yielded a known cembrane, 5-dehydrosinulariolide (3); the structure, including its absolute stereochemistry, was further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23774887 PMCID: PMC3721226 DOI: 10.3390/md11062154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1The structures of 1-epi-sinulanorcembranolide A (1), flexibilin D (2), 5-dehydrosinulariolide (3) and sinulanorcembranolide A (4).
1H (500 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (125 MHz, CDCl3) NMR data and 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for norcembrane 1.
| Position | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.79 m | 39.4, CH | H2-2, H2-14 | C-3, -13, -14, -15 |
| 2/2′ | 2.71 d (16.0); 2.47 dd (16.0, 7.0) | 42.8, CH2 | H-1 | C-1, -3, -4, -14, -15 |
| 3 | 208.7, C | |||
| 4/4′ | 3.00 dd (15.5, 11.0); 2.56 (15.5, 7.0) | 38.9, CH2 | H-5 | C-3, -5, -6, -13 |
| 5 | 2.82 m | 46.6, CH | H2-4, H-13 | C-3, -4, -12, -13, -14 |
| 6 | 198.0, C | |||
| 7 | 129.9, C | |||
| 8 | 145.6, C | |||
| 9 | 2.68 br s | 39.1, CH2 | H-10 | C-7, -8 |
| 10 | 4.50 dd (2.5, 2.5) | 79.4, CH | H2-9, H-11 | C-8, -11, -19 |
| 11 | 4.15 s | 77.0, CH | H-10 | C-7, -10, -19 |
| 12 | 52.6, C | |||
| 13 | 2.88 m | 32.9, CH | H-5, H2-14 | C-1, -5, -19 |
| 14/14′ | 2.71 br d (5.5); 2.11 m | 28.4, CH2 | H-1, H-13 | C-1, -5, -12, -15 |
| 15 | 147.1, C | |||
| 16 | 1.76 s | 21.5, CH3 | H-17a | C-1, -15, -17 |
| 17a/b | 4.86 s; 4.71 s | 112.3, CH2 | H3-16 | C-1, -16 |
| 18 | 2.02 s | 21.0, CH3 | C-7, -8, -9 | |
| 19 | 174.7, C |
Figure 21H–1H COSY and selected HMBC correlations (protons→quaternary carbons) for 1.
Figure 3The computer-generated model of 1 using molecular mechanics calculations (MM2) force field calculations and the calculated distances (Å) between selected protons with key NOESY correlations.
1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (100 MHz, CDCl3) NMR data and 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for cembrane 2.
| Position | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.85 m | 35.4, CH | H2-2, H2-14 | n.o.
|
| 2/2′ | 1.49 m; 1.32 m | 28.2, CH2 | H-1, H2-3 | C-1, -3, -4, -14, -15 |
| 3/3′ | 1.79 ddd (13.6, 11,2, 5.6); 1.64 m | 37.2, CH2 | H2-2 | C-1, -2, -4, -5, -18 |
| 4 | 78.9, C | |||
| 5 | 213.8, C | |||
| 6/6′ | 2.76 ddd (18.0, 8.0, 3.2); 2.65 ddd (18.0, 10.2, 3.2) | 35.1, CH2 | H2-7 | C-5, -7, -8 |
| 7/7′ | 2.48 m; 2.33 m | 31.8, CH2 | H2-6 | C-5, -6, -8, -9 |
| 8 | 134.8, C | |||
| 9 | 5.15 dd (5.6, 5.6) | 126.1, CH | H2-10, H3-19 | C-7, -10, -19 |
| 10 | 2.18 m | 23.1, CH2 | H-9, H2-11 | C-8, -9, -11, -12 |
| 11/11′ | 1.87 dd (8.4, 2,8); 1.69 m | 36.7, CH2 | H2-10 | C-9, -12, -13 |
| 12 | 73.9, C | |||
| 13 | 4.29 dd (9.2, 6.0) | 79.1, CH | H2-14 | C-1, -14, -20 |
| 14 | 1.91 m | 26.2, CH2 | H-1, H-13 | C-12, -13, -15 |
| 15 | 138.0, C | |||
| 16 | 165.5, C | |||
| 17a/b | 6.43 d (1.2); 5.56 dd (1.2, 1.2) | 128.4, CH2 | C-1, -15, -16 | |
| 18 | 1.35 s | 25.2, CH3 | C-3, -4, -5 | |
| 19 | 1.66 s | 17.2, CH3 | H-9 | C-7, -8, -9 |
| 20 | 1.31 s | 24.1, CH3 | C-11, -12, -13 | |
| OH-4 | 3.24 br s | C-5 |
n.o. = not observed.
Figure 41H–1H COSY and selected HMBC correlations (protons→quaternary carbons) for cembrane 2.
Figure 5The computer-generated model of 2 using MM2 force field calculations and the calculated distances (Å) between selected protons with key NOESY correlations.
Figure 6Molecular plot of 3 with confirmed absolute configuration.
1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (100 MHz, CDCl3) NMR data and 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for cembrane 3.
| Position | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.81 m | 34.7, CH | H2-2, H2-14 | C-14, -15, -16, -17 |
| 2/2′ | 2.24 ddd (18.0, 12.4, 6.0); 1.17 m | 30.8, CH2 | H-1, H2-3 | C-1, -3, -4, -14, -15 |
| 3/3′ | 2.41 dd (15.6, 6.0); 1.87 m | 33.1, CH2 | H2-2 | C-1, -2, -4, -18 |
| 4 | 90.4, C | |||
| 5 | 209.1, C | |||
| 6/6′ | 3.11 ddd (20.4, 10.8, 1.6); 2.63 ddd (20.4, 8.4, 1.6) | 33.5, CH2 | H2-7 | C-5, -7, -8 |
| 7/7′ | 2.68 m; 1.94 m | 29.9, CH2 | H2-6 | C-5, -6, -8, -9 |
| 8 | 134.9, C | |||
| 9 | 5.02 ddq (7.2, 7.2, 1.2) | 122.6, CH | H2-10, H3-19 | C-7, -10, -19 |
| 10 | 2.13 m | 24.3, CH2 | H-9, H2-11 | C-8, -9, -11, -12 |
| 11/11′ | 2.02 ddd (13.6, 4.4, 4.0); 1.11 m | 37.4, CH2 | H2-10 | C-9, -10, -12, -13 |
| 12 | 60.5, C | |||
| 13 | 2.65 br s | 62.1, CH | H2-14 | C-14 |
| 14/14′ | 1.84 br s; 1.44 dd (22.8, 10.8) | 32.4, CH2 | H-1, H-13 | C-1, -2, -12, -13, -15 |
| 15 | 143.5, C | |||
| 16 | 167.5, C | |||
| 17a/b | 6.26 s; 5.45 s | 125.7, CH2 | C-1, -15, -16 | |
| 18 | 1.43 s | 29.5, CH3 | C-3, -4, -5 | |
| 19 | 1.59 d (1.2) | 17.1, CH3 | H-9 | C-7, -8, -9 |
| 20 | 1.13 s | 16.0, CH3 | C-11, -12, -13 |
Figure 7Effects of compound 2 on iNOS and COX-2 protein expression of RAW264.7 macrophage cells by immunoblot analysis. The values are the mean ± SEM (n = 5). Relative intensity of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-alone stimulated group was taken as 100%. Under the same experimental condition, CAPE (caffeic acid phenylethyl ester, 10 μM), reduces the levels of the iNOS and COX-2 to 2.8 ± 4.6 and 66.7% ± 9.6%, respectively. * Significantly different from LPS-alone stimulated group (p < 0.05).