Literature DB >> 2377444

The inability of young children to reproduce intensity differences in musical rhythms.

C Gérard1, C Drake.   

Abstract

A musical rhythm can be described in terms of both its temporal and its dynamic structure. However, although 6-year-old children are able to perceive and reproduce simple temporal structures, even 8-year-olds rarely reproduce intensity differences. Four experiments on the perception and reproduction of musical rhythms by 5- to 8-year-old children demonstrate that even though dynamic structure is clearly dominated by its temporal support, intensity differences play a role in reinforcing the temporal structure. The inability of children to reproduce intensity differences appears to be due neither to an inability to control the intensity of their tap responses nor to the fact that they cannot perceive such changes in intensity. Rather, the results seem best interpreted in terms of the allocation of attentional resources. With simple stimulus material (Experiments 1-3), the children focused on temporal information, and only when the processing of temporal information was mastered did they have "enough attention left" to direct it to intensity differences (Experiment 2). With more complex orchestral music (Experiment 4), attention was primarily allocated to the dynamic structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2377444     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  A psychological pulse train: how young children use this cognitive framework to structure simple rhythms.

Authors:  C Drake; C Gérard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1989

2.  The effect of melodic and temporal contour on recognition memory for pitch change.

Authors:  C B Monahan; R A Kendall; E C Carterette
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-06

3.  Dynamic pattern structure in music: recent theory and research.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-06

4.  Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity.

Authors:  C Palmer; C L Krumhansl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-06

5.  Similarity ratings and dimension analyses of auditory rhythm patterns. I.

Authors:  A Gabrielsson
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1973

Review 6.  Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.

Authors:  M R Jones
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Erratum: "melodic accent: experiments and a tentative model" [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1596-1605 (1982)].

Authors:  J M Thomassen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Internal representation of simple temporal patterns.

Authors:  D J Povel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Accents in equitone sequences.

Authors:  D J Povel; H Okkerman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

10.  Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context.

Authors:  M R Jones; M Boltz; G Kidd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Reproduction of musical rhythms by children, adult musicians, and adult nonmusicians.

Authors:  C Drake
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-01

2.  The Development of Musical Skills of Underprivileged Children Over the Course of 1 Year: A Study in the Context of an El Sistema-Inspired Program.

Authors:  Beatriz S Ilari; Patrick Keller; Hanna Damasio; Assal Habibi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.