Literature DB >> 23774429

Relationship between ceftolozane-tazobactam exposure and drug resistance amplification in a hollow-fiber infection model.

Brian Vanscoy1, Rodrigo E Mendes, Mariana Castanheira, Jennifer McCauley, Sujata M Bhavnani, Alan Forrest, Ronald N Jones, Olanrewaju O Okusanya, Lawrence V Friedrich, Judith Steenbergen, Paul G Ambrose.   

Abstract

In an era of rapidly emerging antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, it is critical to understand the importance of the relationships among drug exposure, duration of therapy, and selection of drug resistance. Herein we describe the results of studies designed to determine the ceftolozane-tazobactam exposure necessary to prevent the amplification of drug-resistant bacterial subpopulations in a hollow-fiber infection model. The challenge isolate was a CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli isolate genetically engineered to transcribe a moderate level of blaCTX-M-15. This organism's blaCTX-M-15 transcription level was confirmed by relative quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), β-lactamase hydrolytic assays, and a ceftolozane MIC value of 16 mg/liter. In these studies, the experimental duration (10 days), ceftolozane-tazobactam dose ratio (2:1), and dosing interval (every 8 h) were selected to approximate those expected to be used clinically. The ceftolozane-tazobactam doses studied ranged from 125-62.5 to 1,500-750 mg. Negative- and positive-control arms included no treatment and piperacillin-tazobactam at 4.5 g every 6 h, respectively. An inverted-U-shaped function best described the relationship between bacterial drug resistance amplification and drug exposure. The least- and most-intensive ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens, i.e., 125-62.5, 750-375, 1,000-500, and 1,500-750 mg, did not amplify drug resistance, while drug resistance amplification was observed with intermediate-intensity dosing regimens (250-125 and 500-250 mg). For the intermediate-intensity ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens, the drug-resistant subpopulation became the dominant population by days 4 to 6. The more-intensive ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens (750-375, 1,000-500, and 1,500-750 mg) not only prevented drug resistance amplification but also virtually sterilized the model system. These data support the selection of ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens that minimize the potential for on-therapy drug resistance amplification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23774429      PMCID: PMC3754319          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00461-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  7 in total

1.  Intrapulmonary penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam and piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  Gurudatt Chandorkar; Jennifer A Huntington; Mark H Gotfried; Keith A Rodvold; Obiamiwe Umeh
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Bacterial-population responses to drug-selective pressure: examination of garenoxacin's effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Vincent H Tam; Arnold Louie; Mark R Deziel; Weiguo Liu; Robert Leary; George L Drusano
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  NIH-98-134: Contemporary Medicine as Presented by its Practitioners Themselves, Leipzig, 1923:217-250.

Authors:  Hugo Schulz; Ted Crump
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-07

4.  Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of tazobactam in combination with ceftolozane in an in vitro infection model.

Authors:  Brian VanScoy; Rodrigo E Mendes; Anthony M Nicasio; Mariana Castanheira; Catharine C Bulik; Olanrewaju O Okusanya; Sujata M Bhavnani; Alan Forrest; Ronald N Jones; Lawrence V Friedrich; Judith N Steenbergen; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous ceftolozane-tazobactam in healthy adult subjects following single and multiple ascending doses.

Authors:  Benjamin Miller; Ellie Hershberger; David Benziger; Mymy Trinh; Ian Friedland
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Impact of resistance selection and mutant growth fitness on the relative efficacies of streptomycin and levofloxacin for plague therapy.

Authors:  Arnold Louie; Mark R Deziel; Weiguo Liu; George L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Inhibition of the renal excretion of tazobactam by piperacillin.

Authors:  M Komuro; T Maeda; H Kakuo; H Matsushita; J Shimada
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.790

  7 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Suppression of Emergence of Resistance in Pathogenic Bacteria: Keeping Our Powder Dry, Part 2.

Authors:  G L Drusano; William Hope; Alasdair MacGowan; Arnold Louie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Relationship between Fosfomycin Exposure and Amplification of Escherichia coli Subpopulations with Reduced Susceptibility in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Brian VanScoy; Jennifer McCauley; Sujata M Bhavnani; Evelyn J Ellis-Grosse; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  What Antibiotic Exposures Are Required to Suppress the Emergence of Resistance for Gram-Negative Bacteria? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chandra Datta Sumi; Aaron J Heffernan; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Fekade B Sime
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Relationship between ceftolozane-tazobactam exposure and selection for Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance in a hollow-fiber infection model.

Authors:  Brian D VanScoy; Rodrigo E Mendes; Mariana Castanheira; Jennifer McCauley; Sujata M Bhavnani; Ronald N Jones; Lawrence V Friedrich; Judith N Steenbergen; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Phillip Chung; Heather Adam; Sheryl Zelenitsky; Andrew Denisuik; Frank Schweizer; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Ethan Rubinstein; Alfred S Gin; Andrew Walkty; Daryl J Hoban; Joseph P Lynch; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance.

Authors:  A J Heffernan; F B Sime; J Lipman; J A Roberts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Combinatorial Pharmacodynamics of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against Genotypically Defined β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli: Insights into the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations.

Authors:  Rachel L Soon; Justin R Lenhard; Zackery P Bulman; Patricia N Holden; Pamela Kelchlin; Judith N Steenbergen; Lawrence V Friedrich; Alan Forrest; Brian T Tsuji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Ceftolozane/Tazobactam: A Review in Complicated Intra-Abdominal and Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Paradoxical Effect of Polymyxin B: High Drug Exposure Amplifies Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Brian T Tsuji; Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Justin R Lenhard; Soon-Ee Cheah; Visanu Thamlikitkul; Gauri G Rao; Patricia N Holden; Alan Forrest; Jürgen B Bulitta; Roger L Nation; Jian Li
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with various resistance patterns isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2011-2012).

Authors:  David J Farrell; Robert K Flamm; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.