OBJECTIVES: Appropriate antibiotic exposure at the site of infection is important for clinically effective therapy. This study compared the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam, which has potent in vitro activity against many Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia, with that of piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: In this Phase 1, open-label trial, 51 healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive three doses of either ceftolozane/tazobactam 1.5 g administered every 8 h via a 60 min infusion or piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g administered every 6 h via a 30 min infusion. Serial blood samples were obtained for determination of plasma drug concentrations. Bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed at pre-specified timepoints in five subjects per timepoint in each treatment group to determine the ELF drug concentration. The penetration of individual analytes into the ELF was determined from the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in ELF to that in plasma (AUC(ELF)/AUC(plasma)). RESULTS:Plasma and ELF concentrations of ceftolozane, piperacillin and tazobactam increased rapidly, reaching maximal concentrations at the end of the infusion. Mean maximum concentration and AUC from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval (AUC(0-τ)) for ceftolozane in ELF were 21.8 mg/L and 75.1 mg·h/L, respectively. Corresponding values for piperacillin were 58.8 mg/L and 94.5 mg·h/L. The ELF/plasma AUC ratio for ceftolozane was 0.48 compared with 0.26 for piperacillin. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ceftolozane penetrated well into the ELF following parenteral administration of ceftolozane/tazobactam.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Appropriate antibiotic exposure at the site of infection is important for clinically effective therapy. This study compared the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam, which has potent in vitro activity against many Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia, with that of piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: In this Phase 1, open-label trial, 51 healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive three doses of either ceftolozane/tazobactam 1.5 g administered every 8 h via a 60 min infusion or piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g administered every 6 h via a 30 min infusion. Serial blood samples were obtained for determination of plasma drug concentrations. Bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed at pre-specified timepoints in five subjects per timepoint in each treatment group to determine the ELF drug concentration. The penetration of individual analytes into the ELF was determined from the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in ELF to that in plasma (AUC(ELF)/AUC(plasma)). RESULTS: Plasma and ELF concentrations of ceftolozane, piperacillin and tazobactam increased rapidly, reaching maximal concentrations at the end of the infusion. Mean maximum concentration and AUC from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval (AUC(0-τ)) for ceftolozane in ELF were 21.8 mg/L and 75.1 mg·h/L, respectively. Corresponding values for piperacillin were 58.8 mg/L and 94.5 mg·h/L. The ELF/plasma AUC ratio for ceftolozane was 0.48 compared with 0.26 for piperacillin. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that ceftolozane penetrated well into the ELF following parenteral administration of ceftolozane/tazobactam.
Authors: Kajal B Larson; Yogesh T Patel; Susan Willavize; John S Bradley; Elizabeth G Rhee; Luzelena Caro; Matthew L Rizk Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ana Motos; Joseph L Kuti; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Antoni Torres; David P Nicolau Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Brian Vanscoy; Rodrigo E Mendes; Mariana Castanheira; Jennifer McCauley; Sujata M Bhavnani; Alan Forrest; Ronald N Jones; Olanrewaju O Okusanya; Lawrence V Friedrich; Judith Steenbergen; Paul G Ambrose Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-06-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Brian VanScoy; Rodrigo E Mendes; Anthony M Nicasio; Mariana Castanheira; Catharine C Bulik; Olanrewaju O Okusanya; Sujata M Bhavnani; Alan Forrest; Ronald N Jones; Lawrence V Friedrich; Judith N Steenbergen; Paul G Ambrose Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ana Motos; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Francesco Pagliara; Laia Fernandez-Barat; Hua Yang; Eli Aguilera Xiol; Tarek Senussi; Francesco A Idone; Chiara Travierso; Chiara Chiurazzi; Rosanel Amaro; Minlan Yang; Joaquim Bobi; Montserrat Rigol; David P Nicolau; Gerard Frigola; Roberto Cabrera; Jose Ramirez; Paolo Pelosi; Francesco Blasi; Massimo Antonelli; Antonio Artigas; Jordi Vila; Marin Kollef; Antoni Torres Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: M J Melchers; E Mavridou; S Seyedmousavi; A C van Mil; C Lagarde; J W Mouton Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: George G Zhanel; Phillip Chung; Heather Adam; Sheryl Zelenitsky; Andrew Denisuik; Frank Schweizer; Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Ethan Rubinstein; Alfred S Gin; Andrew Walkty; Daryl J Hoban; Joseph P Lynch; James A Karlowsky Journal: Drugs Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Brian Vanscoy; Rodrigo E Mendes; Jennifer McCauley; Sujata M Bhavnani; Catharine C Bulik; Olanrewaju O Okusanya; Alan Forrest; Ronald N Jones; Lawrence V Friedrich; Judith N Steenbergen; Paul G Ambrose Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 5.191