Literature DB >> 23773964

Early experience with the Vanguard complete total knee system: 2-7 years of follow-up and risk factors for revision.

Arthur J Kievit1, Matthias U Schafroth1, Leendert Blankevoort1, Inger N Sierevelt2, C Niek van Dijk1, Rutger C I van Geenen3.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study in two hospitals was performed on 807 patients with a primary Vanguard (Biomet) total knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The research questions addressed were (1) what are the two- and six year survival rates of the Vanguard, (2) what are the clinical outcome scores, (3) what are the findings at revision and (4) what are predictors for revision? The mean age at time of surgery was 67.0 (SD 10.0). The mean follow-up was 3.6 years (95% CI 3.56-3.73). At two years the survival was 97.2% for all-reasons (767 patients remaining) and 99%, for prosthesis-related-reasons (777 remaining). At six years this was 96.5% (40 remaining) and 98.6% (41 remaining). The mean clinical results (84% response on KOOS, Oxford and NRS) were good. A previous osteotomy was a risk factor for revision (hazard ratio 5.1, P=0.001). This early experience with the Vanguard shows a good survival with no adverse outcomes related to the implant and therefore further use of the implant is justified.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kaplan–Meier survival; Vanguard; revision rates; risk factors; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23773964     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  13 in total

Review 1.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Analysis of differences in bone removal during femoral box osteotomy for primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Angelo Graceffa; Pier Francesco Indelli; Kaitlyn Basnett; Massimiliano Marcucci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-07-08

3.  Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Jelle P van der List; Lily Lee; Thomas M Coon; Todd A Borus; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes after TKA using two prostheses with different patellofemoral design features.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Jong Hun Baek; Kyung Tack Yoon; Hyuck Sung Son; Sang Jun Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  No difference in terms of radiostereometric analysis between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  M G M Schotanus; P Pilot; B L Kaptein; W F Draijer; P B J Tilman; R Vos; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Clinical Outcomes in Men and Women following Total Knee Arthroplasty with a High-Flex Knee: No Clinical Effect of Gender.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Nassif; William S Pietrzak
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-09-16

7.  Primary posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: analysis of different instrumentation.

Authors:  Pier Francesco Indelli; Massimiliano Marcucci; Angelo Graceffa; Sophie Charlton; Leonardo Latella
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Which patients do not return to work after total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  P Paul F M Kuijer; Arthur J Kievit; Thijs M J Pahlplatz; Truus Hooiveld; Marco J M Hoozemans; Leendert Blankevoort; Matthias U Schafroth; Rutger C I van Geenen; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.631

9.  Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Morten G Thomsen; Roshan Latifi; Thomas Kallemose; Henrik Husted; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Morten G Thomsen; Roshan Latifi; Thomas Kallemose; Kristoffer W Barfod; Henrik Husted; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.