Literature DB >> 23773717

Preventable mortality: does the perspective matter when determining preventability?

Meera Gupta1, Barry Fuchs, Carolyn Cutilli, Jessica Cintolo, Caroline Reinke, Craig Kean, Neil Fishman, Patricia Sullivan, Rachel R Kelz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report a novel approach to mortality review using a 360° survey and a multidisciplinary mortality committee (MMC) to optimize efforts to improve inpatient care.
METHODS: In 2009, a 16-item, 360° compulsory quality improvement survey was implemented for mortality review. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare the responses by provider specialty, profession, and level of training using the Fisher exact and chi-square tests, as appropriate. We compared the agreement between the MMC review and provider-reported classification regarding the preventability of each death using the Cohen kappa coefficient. A qualitative review of 360° information was performed to identify the quality opportunities.
RESULTS: Completed surveys (n = 3095) were submitted for 1683 patients. The possibility of a preventable death was suggested in the 360° survey for 42 patients (1.40%). We identified 502 patients (29.83%) with completed 360° surveys who underwent MMC review. The inter-rater reliability between the provider opinions regarding preventable death and the MMC review was poor (kappa = 0.10, P < 0.001). Of the 42 cases identified by the 360° survey as preventable deaths, 15 underwent MMC review; 3 were classified as preventable and 12 were deemed unavoidable. Qualitative analyses of the 12 discrepancies did reveal quality issues; however, they were not deemed responsible for the patients' death.
CONCLUSIONS: The mortality survey yielded important information regarding inpatient deaths that historically was buried with the patient. Poor agreement between the 360° survey responses and an objective MMC review support the need to have a multipronged approach to evaluating inpatient mortality.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  360° survey; Mortality review process; Multidisciplinary mortality review; Preventable mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23773717     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

Review 1.  The impact of the national clinical outcome review programmes in England: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Pauline Heslop; Elena Baker-Glenn; Peter Fleming; Marian Knight; Marisa Mason; Pauline Turnbull; Clare Wade
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Comparing Two Review Processes for Determination of Preventability of Maternal Mortality in Illinois.

Authors:  Stacie E Geller; Abigail R Koch; Nancy J Martin; Patricia Prentice; Deborah Rosenberg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

3.  Qualitative exploration of the Medical Examiner role in identifying problems with the quality of patient care.

Authors:  Rachel O'Hara; Joanne Coster; Steve Goodacre
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Ranking Hospitals Based on Preventable Hospital Death Rates: A Systematic Review With Implications for Both Direct Measurement and Indirect Measurement Through Standardized Mortality Rates.

Authors:  Semira Manaseki-Holland; Richard J Lilford; An P Te; Yen-Fu Chen; Keshav K Gupta; Peter J Chilton; Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.911

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.