OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to develop a measure of social health using item response theory as part of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). METHODS: After candidate items were generated from review of prior literature, focus groups, expert input, and cognitive interviews, items were administered to youth aged 8-17 as part of the PROMIS pediatric large scale testing. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess dimensionality and to identify instances of local dependence. Items that met the unidimensionality criteria were subsequently calibrated using Samejima's Graded Response Model. Differential item functioning was examined by gender and age. RESULTS: The sample included 3,048 youth who completed the questionnaire (51.8% female, 60% white, and 22.7% with chronic illness). The initial conceptualization of social function and sociability did not yield unidimensional item banks. Rather, factor analysis revealed dimensions contrasting peer relationships and adult relationships. The analysis also identified dimensions formed by responses to positively versus negatively worded items. The resulting 15-item bank measures quality of peer relationships and has strong psychometric characteristics as a full bank or an 8-item short form. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS pediatric peer relationships scale demonstrates good psychometric characteristics and addresses an important aspect of child health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to develop a measure of social health using item response theory as part of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). METHODS: After candidate items were generated from review of prior literature, focus groups, expert input, and cognitive interviews, items were administered to youth aged 8-17 as part of the PROMIS pediatric large scale testing. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess dimensionality and to identify instances of local dependence. Items that met the unidimensionality criteria were subsequently calibrated using Samejima's Graded Response Model. Differential item functioning was examined by gender and age. RESULTS: The sample included 3,048 youth who completed the questionnaire (51.8% female, 60% white, and 22.7% with chronic illness). The initial conceptualization of social function and sociability did not yield unidimensional item banks. Rather, factor analysis revealed dimensions contrasting peer relationships and adult relationships. The analysis also identified dimensions formed by responses to positively versus negatively worded items. The resulting 15-item bank measures quality of peer relationships and has strong psychometric characteristics as a full bank or an 8-item short form. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS pediatric peer relationships scale demonstrates good psychometric characteristics and addresses an important aspect of child health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Robert B Noll; Jennifer Reiter-Purtill; Kathryn Vannatta; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Amy Short Journal: Child Neuropsychol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: James W Varni; David Thissen; Brian D Stucky; Yang Liu; Hally Gorder; Debra E Irwin; Esi Morgan DeWitt; Jin-Shei Lai; Dagmar Amtmann; Darren A DeWalt Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: James W Varni; David Thissen; Brian D Stucky; Yang Liu; Brooke Magnus; Jason He; Esi Morgan DeWitt; Debra E Irwin; Jin-Shei Lai; Dagmar Amtmann; Darren A DeWalt Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Jin-Shei Lai; Corey Bregman; Frank Zelko; Cindy Nowinski; David Cella; Jennifer J Beaumont; Stewart Goldman Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Timothy G Brandon; Brandon D Becker; Katherine B Bevans; Pamela F Weiss Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Hilary Bertisch; Frederick P Rivara; Pamela A Kisala; Jin Wang; Keith Owen Yeates; Dennis Durbin; Mark R Zonfrillo; Michael J Bell; Nancy Temkin; David S Tulsky Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Joan S Tucker; Anthony Rodriguez; Michael S Dunbar; Eric R Pedersen; Jordan P Davis; Regina A Shih; Elizabeth J D'Amico Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-08-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Elizabeth J D'Amico; Joan S Tucker; Jeremy N V Miles; Brett A Ewing; Regina A Shih; Eric R Pedersen Journal: Addiction Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 6.526