Literature DB >> 23772820

Latent classes in the developmental trajectories of infant handedness.

George F Michel1, Iryna Babik1, Ching-Fan Sheu2, Julie M Campbell1.   

Abstract

Handedness for acquiring objects was assessed monthly from 6 to 14 months in 328 infants (182 males). A group based trajectory model identified 3 latent groups with different developmental trajectories: those with an identifiable right preference (38%) or left preference (14%) and those without an identifiable preference (48%) but with a significant trend toward right-handedness. Each group exhibited significant quadratic trends: Those with a right preference increased to asymptote at about 10 months and began decreasing thereafter; those with a left preference increased to asymptote at about 11 months; those without a preference exhibited increasing right-hand use. Since adult handedness reflects different patterns of neural organization which relate to differences in psychological functioning, the observed differences in infant handedness development may relate to differences in the development of infant neurobehavioral organization and functioning. Several methods were used to explore the relation of latent classes to more conventional ways of classifying infant handedness. Classification into handedness groups according to either a monthly z-score or a combination of 4 or fewer months for a handedness index failed to provide reliable estimates of handedness identified by the trajectory analysis. If identified trajectories of handedness development relate to the development of the infant's neurobehavioral organization, researchers who assess infant handedness only once in order to relate it to cognitive, social and emotional functioning may risk misclassifying the handedness of as many as 37-45% of infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23772820     DOI: 10.1037/a0033312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  10 in total

Review 1.  How the development of handedness could contribute to the development of language.

Authors:  George F Michel; Iryna Babik; Eliza L Nelson; Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.038

2.  The influence of a hand preference for acquiring objects on the development of a hand preference for unimanual manipulation from 6 to 14 months.

Authors:  Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski; Iryna Babik; George F Michel
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2015-03-28

3.  Long-term practice of isolated finger movements reduces enslaved response of tonically contracting little finger abductor to tonic index finger abduction.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Shun Ito; Momoko Lutton; Maya Nakano; Noritaka Yonei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Preschool language ability is predicted by toddler hand preference trajectories.

Authors:  Sandy L Gonzalez; Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski; George F Michel; Stefany Coxe; Eliza L Nelson
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2020-01-30

5.  Measuring infant handedness reliably from reaching: A systematic review.

Authors:  Eliza L Nelson; Sandy L Gonzalez
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2020-02-16

6.  Different assessment tasks produce different estimates of handedness stability during the eight to 14 month age period.

Authors:  Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski; Jonathan Latta; George F Michel
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2015-03-11

7.  Toddler hand preference trajectories predict 3-year language outcome.

Authors:  Eliza L Nelson; Sandy L Gonzalez; Stefany Coxe; Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski; George F Michel
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.038

8.  Addressing the gap: a blueprint for studying bimanual hand preference in infants.

Authors:  Sandy L Gonzalez; Eliza L Nelson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-05

9.  Infant Hand Preference and the Development of Cognitive Abilities.

Authors:  George F Michel; Julie M Campbell; Emily C Marcinowski; Eliza L Nelson; Iryna Babik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-23

10.  Is Handedness at Five Associated with Prenatal Factors?

Authors:  Jacqueline Fagard; Maria De Agostini; Viviane Huet; Lionel Granjon; Barbara Heude
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.