Literature DB >> 23772282

Perinatal outcome of monochorionic in comparison to dichorionic
twin pregnancies.

Nihal Al Riyami1, Asmaa Al-Rusheidi, Murtadha Al-Khabori.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the neonatal outcomes of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study involving 51 twin pregnancies followed and delivered at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital was conducted between January 2006 and December 2011. RESULT: Thirty six (71%) pregnancies were dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA), 14 (27%) were monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA), and one (2%) was monochorionic monoamniotic (MCMA). The antepartum complications noted in the 15 monochorionic twins were discordant fetal growth in 2 (14%) cases, low birth weight in 11 (73%) babies, pre-eclampsia in three mothers (21%) and twin to twin transfusion syndrome in four (29%) cases. Fetal respiratory distress affected eight (57%) of the pregnancies. Six (40%) twin sets were delivered before 30 weeks, 4 (27%) sets at 31 to 32 weeks, 2 (13%) sets at 34-35 weeks, 2 (13%) sets at 36-37 weeks, and 1 (7%) at 37-38 weeks. Fifteen mothers delivered 16 live infants, 9 (30%) stillbirths and 5 (17%) died after birth. Most neonatal deaths were due to neonatal sepsis and pulmonary hypoplasia. Dichorioinic twins, (DC) morbidity was seen in 11% and 40% for monochoroinic twins (MC). Mortality rate was 17% for DC and 47% for MC twins.
CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal morbidity and mortality remain high among monochorionic twins. This is likely due to frequent twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, prematurity, fetal growth restriction and intrauterine fetal death. Improved fetal and neonatal management may result in improved outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dichorionic, Outcome; Monochorionic; Twins

Year:  2013        PMID: 23772282      PMCID: PMC3679607          DOI: 10.5001/omj.2013.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oman Med J        ISSN: 1999-768X


  14 in total

1.  Incidence of intrauterine complications in monoamniotic twin gestation.

Authors:  S Suzuki; K Kaneko; S Shin; T Araki
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins.

Authors:  A Victoria; G Mora; F Arias
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Monoamniotic-versus diamniotic-monochorionic twin placentas: anastomoses and twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

Authors:  Asli Umur; Martin J C van Gemert; Peter G J Nikkels
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Monoamniotic twins: improved perinatal survival with accurate prenatal diagnosis and antenatal fetal surveillance.

Authors:  J F Rodis; P F McIlveen; J F Egan; A F Borgida; G W Turner; W A Campbell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Intensive management and early delivery reduce antenatal mortality in monoamniotic twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Yossef Ezra; David Shveiky; Ella Ophir; Michael Nadjari; Vered H Eisenberg; Arnon Samueloff; Nathan Rojansky
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies delivered in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Renata Almeida de Assunção; Adolfo Wenjaw Liao; Maria de Lourdes Brizot; Vera Lúcia Jornada Krebs; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.209

Review 7.  Management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies: a case series and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  V M Allen; R Windrim; J Barrett; A Ohlsson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Vascular anatomy of monochorionic placenta in relation to discordant growth and amniotic fluid volume.

Authors:  R Bajoria
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Births: final data for 2002.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Paul D Sutton; Stephanie J Ventura; Fay Menacker; Martha L Munson
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2003-12-17

10.  The risks confronting twins: a national perspective.

Authors:  W F Powers; J L Kiely
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  5 in total

1.  Conservative management of fetus papyraceus: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Pushpa Dahiya; Ranjita Bains
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-03

2.  Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to maternal age.

Authors:  Yeon-Joo Lee; Mi-Na Kim; Yoo-Min Kim; Ji-Hee Sung; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-02-25

3.  Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in twin vs. singleton pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Rui Gao; Yong Liu; Ke Zhao; Xiaolin Su; Hin Ching Wong; Luyao Li; Binbin Xie; Yuanyan Huang; Chuhui Qiu; Jiang He; Chaoqun Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  Obstetric outcomes of monochorionic pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Mariano Mascarenhas; Mohan S Kamath; K Muthukumar; Ann M Mangalaraj; Achamma Chandy; Tk Aleyamma
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-04

5.  Genetic and Environmental Influences on Fetal Growth Vary during Sensitive Periods in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Tsegaselassie Workalemahu; Katherine L Grantz; Jagteshwar Grewal; Cuilin Zhang; Germaine M Buck Louis; Fasil Tekola-Ayele
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.