Asli Umur1, Martin J C van Gemert, Peter G J Nikkels. 1. Laser Center and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare monoamniotic-monochorionic and diamniotic-monochorionic twin placentas and to estimate the incidence of twin-twin transfusion syndrome in monoamniotic-monochorionic twin pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed the angioarchitecture and cord insertion distance in 24 monoamniotic-monochorionic and 200 diamniotic-monochorionic placentas. RESULTS: Compared with diamniotic-monochorionic placentas, monoamniotic-monochorionic placentas had significantly more arterioarterial anastomoses (20/20 vs 159/200, respectively; P=.013), significantly less opposite arteriovenous anastomoses (10/20 vs 165/200, respectively; P=.002), similar venovenous anastomoses (6/20 vs 46/200, respectively; P=.323), and arteriovenous anastomoses (20/20 vs 187/200 respectively; P=.279) and significantly shorter umbilical cord distances (median [+/-SD], 5.0+/-6.9 cm vs 17.5+/-6.8 cm; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Monoamniotic-monochorionic and diamniotic-monochorionic placentas have different anastomotic patterns. The (virtually) 100% incidence of arterioarterial anastomoses in monoamniotic-monochorionic placentas explains the reason that twin-twin transfusion syndrome rarely occurs in monoamniotic-monochorionic twin pregnancies and predicts that twin-twin transfusion syndrome manifestations are approximately 5 times less often recognized in monoamniotic-monochorionic pregnancies than in diamniotic-monochorionic pregnancies.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare monoamniotic-monochorionic and diamniotic-monochorionic twin placentas and to estimate the incidence of twin-twin transfusion syndrome in monoamniotic-monochorionic twin pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed the angioarchitecture and cord insertion distance in 24 monoamniotic-monochorionic and 200 diamniotic-monochorionic placentas. RESULTS: Compared with diamniotic-monochorionic placentas, monoamniotic-monochorionic placentas had significantly more arterioarterial anastomoses (20/20 vs 159/200, respectively; P=.013), significantly less opposite arteriovenous anastomoses (10/20 vs 165/200, respectively; P=.002), similar venovenous anastomoses (6/20 vs 46/200, respectively; P=.323), and arteriovenous anastomoses (20/20 vs 187/200 respectively; P=.279) and significantly shorter umbilical cord distances (median [+/-SD], 5.0+/-6.9 cm vs 17.5+/-6.8 cm; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Monoamniotic-monochorionic and diamniotic-monochorionic placentas have different anastomotic patterns. The (virtually) 100% incidence of arterioarterial anastomoses in monoamniotic-monochorionic placentas explains the reason that twin-twin transfusion syndrome rarely occurs in monoamniotic-monochorionic twin pregnancies and predicts that twin-twin transfusion syndrome manifestations are approximately 5 times less often recognized in monoamniotic-monochorionic pregnancies than in diamniotic-monochorionic pregnancies.
Authors: Enrico Lopriore; Femke Slaghekke; Johanna M Middeldorp; Frans J Klumper; Jan M van Lith; Frans J Walther; Dick Oepkes Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 1.355