Literature DB >> 22898988

Coxa profunda: is the deep acetabulum overcovered?

Lucas A Anderson1, Ashley L Kapron, Stephen K Aoki, Christopher L Peters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coxa profunda, or a deep acetabular socket, is often used to diagnose pincer femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Radiographically, coxa profunda is the finding of an acetabular fossa medial to the ilioischial line. However, the relative position of the acetabular fossa to the pelvis may not be indicative of acetabular coverage. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined the incidence of coxa profunda and evaluated associations between coxa profunda and other radiographic parameters of acetabular coverage commonly used to diagnose pincer FAI and acetabular dysplasia.
METHODS: We evaluated the radiographs of three cohorts for coxa profunda, lateral center edge (LCE) angle, acetabular index, posterior wall sign, and crossover sign. Data from 67 collegiate football players were collected prospectively (Cohort 1). We identified two patient cohorts through retrospective review of all 179 hips undergoing hip preservation surgery from 2002 to 2008 (83 periacetabular osteotomies [Cohort 2] and 96 surgical dislocation and osteochondroplasties [Cohort 3]).
RESULTS: In all three cohorts, we detected no difference in the LCE angle or acetabular index between hips with and without coxa profunda. Coxa profunda existed in hips representing the spectrum of acetabular coverage measured by LCE angle (-18° to 60°) and acetabular orientation determined by the crossover sign.
CONCLUSIONS: Coxa profunda was a common radiographic finding in both symptomatic patients and asymptomatic football players. Coxa profunda existed in hips representing the spectrum of acetabular coverage and was not associated with an overcovered acetabulum. We conclude coxa profunda is unrelated to overcoverage and suggest its use in diagnosis of pincer FAI be abandoned in favor of other determinants of focal or general overcoverage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22898988      PMCID: PMC3492622          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2509-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  38 in total

1.  Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain.

Authors:  D Reynolds; J Lucas; K Klaue
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-03

2.  Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis.

Authors:  R Ganz; T J Gill; E Gautier; K Ganz; N Krügel; U Berlemann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

3.  [Protrusive malformation and its arthrotic complication. II. The arthrotic complication].

Authors:  M RUELLE; J L DUBOIS
Journal:  Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic       Date:  1962-11

4.  Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players: AAOS Exhibit Selection.

Authors:  Ashley L Kapron; Andrew E Anderson; Stephen K Aoki; Lee G Phillips; David J Petron; Robert Toth; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  R Ganz; K Klaue; T S Vinh; J W Mast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Radiographic case definitions and prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the hip: a survey of 4 151 subjects in the Osteoarthritis Substudy of the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Authors:  Steffen Jacobsen; Stig Sonne-Holm; Kjeld Søballe; Peter Gebuhr; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-12

7.  The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  M Lequesne; J Malghem; E Dion
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Recognizing acetabular version in the radiographic presentation of hip dysplasia.

Authors:  J W Mast; R L Brunner; J Zebrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Martin Beck; Michael Leunig; Javad Parvizi; Vincent Boutier; Daniel Wyss; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Nicholas J Giori; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  16 in total

1.  Radiographic signs associated with femoroacetabular impingement occur with high prevalence at all ages in a hospital population.

Authors:  F de Bruin; M Reijnierse; V Farhang-Razi; J L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  CORR Insights®: Acetabular Version Increases After Closure of the Triradiate Cartilage Complex.

Authors:  H John Cooper
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  ABJS Carl T. Brighton workshop on hip preservation surgery: editorial comment.

Authors:  Klaus-Arno Siebenrock; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The borderline dysplastic hip: when and how is it abnormal?

Authors:  Sarah D Bixby; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04

Review 5.  The Human Pelvis: Variation in Structure and Function During Gait.

Authors:  Cara L Lewis; Natalie M Laudicina; Anne Khuu; Kari L Loverro
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Does radiographic coxa profunda indicate increased acetabular coverage or depth in hip dysplasia?

Authors:  Masanori Fujii; Tetsuro Nakamura; Toshihiko Hara; Yasuharu Nakashima; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  What Factors Are Associated With Postoperative Ischiofemoral Impingement After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?

Authors:  Ying Huang; Zheng Zeng; Liu-Yang Xu; Yang Li; Jian-Ping Peng; Chao Shen; Guoyan Zheng; Xiao-Dong Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Operative treatment of FAI: open hip preservation surgery.

Authors:  Michael D Hellman; Andrew J Riff; Bryan D Haughom; Rikesh Patel; Michael D Stover; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

9.  Measures of hip morphology are related to development of worsening radiographic hip osteoarthritis over 6 to 13 year follow-up: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  A E Nelson; J L Stiller; X A Shi; K M Leyland; J B Renner; T A Schwartz; N K Arden; J M Jordan
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  A comparative radiographic morphometric analysis to assess the normal radiological morphology of the adult hip in indian population.

Authors:  Balaji Zacharia; K Mohammed Fawas
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.