OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between dementia and blood pressure (BP) in 8 low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: In identical cross-sectional surveys of older adults (aged 65 years and older) conducted in Cuba, Dominican Republic, Peru, Venezuela, Mexico, Puerto Rico, China, and India (n = 15,746), we measured systolic and diastolic BP and used the 10/66 prevalidated algorithms to adjudicate dementia diagnosis and quantify dementia severity (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]). RESULTS: BP levels, dementia prevalence, and participants' sociodemographic and health characteristics varied across sites. In fixed-effect meta-analyses of site-specific linear regression coefficients adjusted for potential confounders, dementia and CDR were cross-sectionally associated with lower systolic BP (β = -1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.8, -0.6; and β = -1.1, 95% CI: -1.5, -0.7) and diastolic BP (β = -0.4, 95% CI: -1.1, 0.2; and β = -0.4, 95% CI: -0.7, -0.2). Associations were heterogeneous across sites for both dementia (I(2) < 47%) and CDR (I(2) < 75%), and were strongest in Cuba, where prevalence of hypertension was highest. Results were robust to alternative model specifications that accounted for hypertensive status, antihypertensive treatment, and leanness (i.e., smaller waist circumference). CONCLUSION: The association between dementia and lower BP was heterogeneous across geographically diverse samples, strongest where prevalent hypertension was highest (in Cuba), and relatively small compared with that found in Western settings. Both the mechanisms and the extent to which different levels of lifetime hypertensive disease explain this heterogeneity remain uncertain. However, because rapid increments in both dementia and hypertension are predicted in low- and middle-income countries, closer monitoring is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between dementia and blood pressure (BP) in 8 low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: In identical cross-sectional surveys of older adults (aged 65 years and older) conducted in Cuba, Dominican Republic, Peru, Venezuela, Mexico, Puerto Rico, China, and India (n = 15,746), we measured systolic and diastolic BP and used the 10/66 prevalidated algorithms to adjudicate dementia diagnosis and quantify dementia severity (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]). RESULTS: BP levels, dementia prevalence, and participants' sociodemographic and health characteristics varied across sites. In fixed-effect meta-analyses of site-specific linear regression coefficients adjusted for potential confounders, dementia and CDR were cross-sectionally associated with lower systolic BP (β = -1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.8, -0.6; and β = -1.1, 95% CI: -1.5, -0.7) and diastolic BP (β = -0.4, 95% CI: -1.1, 0.2; and β = -0.4, 95% CI: -0.7, -0.2). Associations were heterogeneous across sites for both dementia (I(2) < 47%) and CDR (I(2) < 75%), and were strongest in Cuba, where prevalence of hypertension was highest. Results were robust to alternative model specifications that accounted for hypertensive status, antihypertensive treatment, and leanness (i.e., smaller waist circumference). CONCLUSION: The association between dementia and lower BP was heterogeneous across geographically diverse samples, strongest where prevalent hypertension was highest (in Cuba), and relatively small compared with that found in Western settings. Both the mechanisms and the extent to which different levels of lifetime hypertensive disease explain this heterogeneity remain uncertain. However, because rapid increments in both dementia and hypertension are predicted in low- and middle-income countries, closer monitoring is warranted.
Authors: Anita L DeStefano; Larry D Atwood; Joseph M Massaro; Nancy Heard-Costa; Alexa Beiser; Rhoda Au; Philip A Wolf; Charles DeCarli Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Stephen T Turner; Myriam Fornage; Clifford R Jack; Thomas H Mosley; Sharon L R Kardia; Eric Boerwinkle; Mariza de Andrade Journal: Hypertension Date: 2005-02-07 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Shari R Waldstein; S Carrington Rice; Julian F Thayer; Samer S Najjar; Angelo Scuteri; Alan B Zonderman Journal: Hypertension Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Juan J Llibre Rodriguez; Cleusa P Ferri; Daisy Acosta; Mariella Guerra; Yueqin Huang; K S Jacob; E S Krishnamoorthy; Aquiles Salas; Ana Luisa Sosa; Isaac Acosta; Michael E Dewey; Ciro Gaona; A T Jotheeswaran; Shuran Li; Diana Rodriguez; Guillermina Rodriguez; P Senthil Kumar; Adolfo Valhuerdi; Martin Prince Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-07-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Martin Prince; Cleusa P Ferri; Daisy Acosta; Emiliano Albanese; Raul Arizaga; Michael Dewey; Svetlana I Gavrilova; Mariella Guerra; Yueqin Huang; K S Jacob; E S Krishnamoorthy; Paul McKeigue; Juan Llibre Rodriguez; Aquiles Salas; Ana Luisa Sosa; Renata M M Sousa; Robert Stewart; Richard Uwakwe Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Giuseppe Tosto; Thomas D Bird; David A Bennett; Bradley F Boeve; Adam M Brickman; Carlos Cruchaga; Kelley Faber; Tatiana M Foroud; Martin Farlow; Alison M Goate; Neill R Graff-Radford; Rafael Lantigua; Jennifer Manly; Ruth Ottman; Roger Rosenberg; Daniel J Schaid; Nicole Schupf; Yaakov Stern; Robert A Sweet; Richard Mayeux Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Søren D Østergaard; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Stephen J Sharp; Petroula Proitsi; Luca A Lotta; Felix Day; John R B Perry; Kevin L Boehme; Stefan Walter; John S Kauwe; Laura E Gibbons; Eric B Larson; John F Powell; Claudia Langenberg; Paul K Crane; Nicholas J Wareham; Robert A Scott Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Cassidy M Fiford; Jennifer M Nicholas; Geert Jan Biessels; Christopher A Lane; M Jorge Cardoso; Josephine Barnes Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2020-05-17
Authors: Gayan Perera; P R Rijnbeek; Myriam Alexander; David Ansell; Paul Avillach; Talita Duarte-Salles; Mark Forrest Gordon; Francesco Lapi; Miguel Angel Mayer; Alessandro Pasqua; Lars Pedersen; Johan van Der Lei; Pieter Jelle Visser; Robert Stewart Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-11-14 Impact factor: 2.692