Literature DB >> 23771284

Assessing naturalness in northern great lakes forests based on historical land-cover and vegetation changes.

Urs Gimmi1, Volker C Radeloff.   

Abstract

The concept of naturalness was developed to assess to what degree landscapes represent a natural state. Protected areas are often regarded as the remnants of untouched landscapes although many landscapes commonly perceived as pristine have a long history of human impact. Here, we introduced a historical perspective into the concept of naturalness and the analysis of the effectiveness of protected areas by analyzing historical trajectories in land-cover and forest communities for the Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore on Michigan's Upper Peninsula (USA). Distribution of land-cover and forest community types was reconstructed for pre-settlement time (around 1850), the height of agricultural expansion (1928), and modern conditions (2000). Naturalness of the landscape was assessed by analyzing similarity between pre-settlement and current conditions and by assessing landscape continuity (1850-1928-2000). We compared changes in the strictly protected park core zone with those in the inland buffer zone with ongoing sustainable logging, and a not protected area adjacent to the park. Forest was the dominant land-cover type over the entire study period. We detected a gradient in land-cover continuity from the core zone (81 % continuity) to the inland buffer zone (74 %) and the area outside the park (66 %). Northern hardwood was the dominating forest type in all time points with high continuity (76 %). In contrast, pine forests show a more dynamic pattern with more than 50 % of the initial forests switching to non-forest or early succession forest types by 1928. More than half of the study area was considered as "natural virgin" (no changes in land-cover and forest community type) with a higher portion within the park than in the adjacent area. In contrast, areas with low naturalness are more abundant outside the park. Our study demonstrates the value of integrating historical information into naturalness assessments and the results provide useful information for future park management. More broadly speaking, our study advances research on the effectiveness of protected areas, by going beyond simple measures of averted deforestation, and introducing approaches to directly measure naturalness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771284     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0102-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Ecology. How 'virgin' is virgin rainforest?

Authors:  K J Willis; L Gillson; T M Brncic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  An ecoregional context for forest management on National Wildlife Refuges of the Upper Midwest, USA.

Authors:  R Gregory Corace; Lindsey M Shartell; Lisa A Schulte; Wayne L Brininger; Michelle K D McDowell; Daniel M Kashian
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Increasing development in the surroundings of U.S. National Park Service holdings jeopardizes park effectiveness.

Authors:  Urs Gimmi; Shelley L Schmidt; Todd J Hawbaker; Camilo Alcántara; Ulf Gafvert; Volker C Radeloff
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.

Authors:  Volker C Radeloff; Susan I Stewart; Todd J Hawbaker; Urs Gimmi; Anna M Pidgeon; Curtis H Flather; Roger B Hammer; David P Helmers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Legacies of historical land use on regional forest composition and structure in Wisconsin, USA (mid-1800s-1930s-2000s).

Authors:  Jeanine M Rhemtulla; David J Mladenoff; Murray K Clayton
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  US National Park Buffer Zones: Historical, Scientific, Social, and Legal Aspects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 7.  Global consequences of land use.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Ruth Defries; Gregory P Asner; Carol Barford; Gordon Bonan; Stephen R Carpenter; F Stuart Chapin; Michael T Coe; Gretchen C Daily; Holly K Gibbs; Joseph H Helkowski; Tracey Holloway; Erica A Howard; Christopher J Kucharik; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan A Patz; I Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Peter K Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Amazonia 1492: pristine forest or cultural parkland?

Authors:  Michael J Heckenberger; Afukaka Kuikuro; Urissapá Tabata Kuikuro; J Christian Russell; Morgan Schmidt; Carlos Fausto; Bruna Franchetto
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration.

Authors:  Jeanine M Rhemtulla; David J Mladenoff; Murray K Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Novel and Lost Forests in the Upper Midwestern United States, from New Estimates of Settlement-Era Composition, Stem Density, and Biomass.

Authors:  Simon J Goring; David J Mladenoff; Charles V Cogbill; Sydne Record; Christopher J Paciorek; Stephen T Jackson; Michael C Dietze; Andria Dawson; Jaclyn Hatala Matthes; Jason S McLachlan; John W Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.