Literature DB >> 22052537

An ecoregional context for forest management on National Wildlife Refuges of the Upper Midwest, USA.

R Gregory Corace1, Lindsey M Shartell, Lisa A Schulte, Wayne L Brininger, Michelle K D McDowell, Daniel M Kashian.   

Abstract

To facilitate forest planning and management on National Wildlife Refuges, we synthesized multiple data sources to describe land ownership patterns, land cover, landscape pattern, and changes in forest composition for four ecoregions and their associated refuges of the Upper Midwest. We related observed patterns to ecological processes important for forest conservation and restoration, with specific attention to refuge patterns of importance for forest landbirds of conservation priority. The large amount of public land within the ecoregions (31-80%) suggests that opportunities exist for coarse and meso-scale approaches to conserving and restoring ecological processes affecting the refuges, particularly historical fire regimes. Forests dominate both ecoregions and refuges, but refuge forest patches are generally larger and more aggregated than in associated ecoregions. Broadleaf taxa have increased in dominance in the ecoregions and displaced fire-dependent taxa such as pine (Pinus spp.) and other coniferous species; these changes in forest composition have likely also affected refuge forests. Despite compositional changes, larger forest patches on refuges suggests that they may provide better habitat for area-sensitive forest landbirds of mature, compositionally diverse forests than surrounding lands if management continues to promote increased patch size. We reason that although fine-scale research and monitoring for species of conservation priority is important, broad scale (ecoregional) assessments provide crucial context for effective forest and wildlife management in protected areas.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22052537     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9776-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity.

Authors:  A G Bruner; R E Gullison; R E Rice; G A da Fonseca
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Increasing development in the surroundings of U.S. National Park Service holdings jeopardizes park effectiveness.

Authors:  Urs Gimmi; Shelley L Schmidt; Todd J Hawbaker; Camilo Alcántara; Ulf Gafvert; Volker C Radeloff
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets.

Authors:  S Chape; J Harrison; M Spalding; I Lysenko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function.

Authors:  Ruth DeFries; Andrew Hansen; B L Turner; Robin Reid; Jianguo Liu
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.

Authors:  Volker C Radeloff; Susan I Stewart; Todd J Hawbaker; Urs Gimmi; Anna M Pidgeon; Curtis H Flather; Roger B Hammer; David P Helmers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Higher temporal variability of forest breeding bird communities in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  T Boulinier; J D Nichols; J E Hines; J R Sauer; C H Flather; K H Pollock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-06-23       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Assessing naturalness in northern great lakes forests based on historical land-cover and vegetation changes.

Authors:  Urs Gimmi; Volker C Radeloff
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Climate Drives Modeled Forest Carbon Cycling Resistance and Resilience in the Upper Great Lakes Region, USA.

Authors:  Kalyn Dorheim; Christopher M Gough; Lisa T Haber; Kayla C Mathes; Alexey N Shiklomanov; Ben Bond-Lamberty
Journal:  J Geophys Res Biogeosci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.432

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.